Cargando…
The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: While prognostic information is considered important for treatment decision-making, physicians struggle to communicate prognosis to advanced cancer patients. This systematic review aimed to offer up-to-date, evidence-based guidance on prognostic communication in palliative oncology. METH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7181418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11864-020-00742-y |
_version_ | 1783526035635044352 |
---|---|
author | van der Velden, Naomi C. A. Meijers, Maartje C. Han, Paul K. J. van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. Smets, Ellen M. A. Henselmans, Inge |
author_facet | van der Velden, Naomi C. A. Meijers, Maartje C. Han, Paul K. J. van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. Smets, Ellen M. A. Henselmans, Inge |
author_sort | van der Velden, Naomi C. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While prognostic information is considered important for treatment decision-making, physicians struggle to communicate prognosis to advanced cancer patients. This systematic review aimed to offer up-to-date, evidence-based guidance on prognostic communication in palliative oncology. METHODS: PubMed and PsycInfo were searched until September 2019 for literature on the association between prognostic disclosure (strategies) and patient outcomes in palliative cancer care, and its moderators. Methodological quality was reported. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included. Concerning prognostic disclosure, results revealed a positive association with patients’ prognostic awareness. Findings showed no or positive associations between prognostic disclosure and the physician-patient relationship or the discussion of care preferences. Evidence for an association with the documentation of care preferences or physical outcomes was lacking. Findings on the emotional consequences of prognostic disclosure were multifaceted. Concerning disclosure strategies, affective communication seemingly reduced patients' physiological arousal and improved perceived physician’s support. Affective and explicit communication showed no or beneficial effects on patients’ psychological well-being and satisfaction. Communicating multiple survival scenarios improved prognostic understanding. Physicians displaying expertise, positivity and collaboration fostered hope. Evidence on demographic, clinical and personality factors moderating the effect of prognostic communication was weak. CONCLUSION: If preferred by patients, physicians could disclose prognosis using sensible strategies. The combination of explicit and affective communication, multiple survival scenarios and expert, positive, collaborative behaviour likely benefits most patients. Still, more evidence is needed, and tailoring communication to individual patients is warranted. IMPLICATIONS: Future research should examine the effect of prognostic communication on psychological well-being over time and treatment decision-making, and focus on individualising care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7181418 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71814182020-05-04 The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review van der Velden, Naomi C. A. Meijers, Maartje C. Han, Paul K. J. van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. Smets, Ellen M. A. Henselmans, Inge Curr Treat Options Oncol Palliative and Supportive Care (MP Davis, Section Editor) BACKGROUND: While prognostic information is considered important for treatment decision-making, physicians struggle to communicate prognosis to advanced cancer patients. This systematic review aimed to offer up-to-date, evidence-based guidance on prognostic communication in palliative oncology. METHODS: PubMed and PsycInfo were searched until September 2019 for literature on the association between prognostic disclosure (strategies) and patient outcomes in palliative cancer care, and its moderators. Methodological quality was reported. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included. Concerning prognostic disclosure, results revealed a positive association with patients’ prognostic awareness. Findings showed no or positive associations between prognostic disclosure and the physician-patient relationship or the discussion of care preferences. Evidence for an association with the documentation of care preferences or physical outcomes was lacking. Findings on the emotional consequences of prognostic disclosure were multifaceted. Concerning disclosure strategies, affective communication seemingly reduced patients' physiological arousal and improved perceived physician’s support. Affective and explicit communication showed no or beneficial effects on patients’ psychological well-being and satisfaction. Communicating multiple survival scenarios improved prognostic understanding. Physicians displaying expertise, positivity and collaboration fostered hope. Evidence on demographic, clinical and personality factors moderating the effect of prognostic communication was weak. CONCLUSION: If preferred by patients, physicians could disclose prognosis using sensible strategies. The combination of explicit and affective communication, multiple survival scenarios and expert, positive, collaborative behaviour likely benefits most patients. Still, more evidence is needed, and tailoring communication to individual patients is warranted. IMPLICATIONS: Future research should examine the effect of prognostic communication on psychological well-being over time and treatment decision-making, and focus on individualising care. Springer US 2020-04-23 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7181418/ /pubmed/32328821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11864-020-00742-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Palliative and Supportive Care (MP Davis, Section Editor) van der Velden, Naomi C. A. Meijers, Maartje C. Han, Paul K. J. van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. Smets, Ellen M. A. Henselmans, Inge The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review |
title | The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review |
title_full | The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review |
title_short | The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review |
title_sort | effect of prognostic communication on patient outcomes in palliative cancer care: a systematic review |
topic | Palliative and Supportive Care (MP Davis, Section Editor) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7181418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11864-020-00742-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderveldennaomica theeffectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview AT meijersmaartjec theeffectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview AT hanpaulkj theeffectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview AT vanlaarhovenhannekewm theeffectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview AT smetsellenma theeffectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview AT henselmansinge theeffectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview AT vanderveldennaomica effectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview AT meijersmaartjec effectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview AT hanpaulkj effectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview AT vanlaarhovenhannekewm effectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview AT smetsellenma effectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview AT henselmansinge effectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview |