Cargando…

The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: While prognostic information is considered important for treatment decision-making, physicians struggle to communicate prognosis to advanced cancer patients. This systematic review aimed to offer up-to-date, evidence-based guidance on prognostic communication in palliative oncology. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Velden, Naomi C. A., Meijers, Maartje C., Han, Paul K. J., van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M., Smets, Ellen M. A., Henselmans, Inge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7181418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11864-020-00742-y
_version_ 1783526035635044352
author van der Velden, Naomi C. A.
Meijers, Maartje C.
Han, Paul K. J.
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
Smets, Ellen M. A.
Henselmans, Inge
author_facet van der Velden, Naomi C. A.
Meijers, Maartje C.
Han, Paul K. J.
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
Smets, Ellen M. A.
Henselmans, Inge
author_sort van der Velden, Naomi C. A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While prognostic information is considered important for treatment decision-making, physicians struggle to communicate prognosis to advanced cancer patients. This systematic review aimed to offer up-to-date, evidence-based guidance on prognostic communication in palliative oncology. METHODS: PubMed and PsycInfo were searched until September 2019 for literature on the association between prognostic disclosure (strategies) and patient outcomes in palliative cancer care, and its moderators. Methodological quality was reported. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included. Concerning prognostic disclosure, results revealed a positive association with patients’ prognostic awareness. Findings showed no or positive associations between prognostic disclosure and the physician-patient relationship or the discussion of care preferences. Evidence for an association with the documentation of care preferences or physical outcomes was lacking. Findings on the emotional consequences of prognostic disclosure were multifaceted. Concerning disclosure strategies, affective communication seemingly reduced patients' physiological arousal and improved perceived physician’s support. Affective and explicit communication showed no or beneficial effects on patients’ psychological well-being and satisfaction. Communicating multiple survival scenarios improved prognostic understanding. Physicians displaying expertise, positivity and collaboration fostered hope. Evidence on demographic, clinical and personality factors moderating the effect of prognostic communication was weak. CONCLUSION: If preferred by patients, physicians could disclose prognosis using sensible strategies. The combination of explicit and affective communication, multiple survival scenarios and expert, positive, collaborative behaviour likely benefits most patients. Still, more evidence is needed, and tailoring communication to individual patients is warranted. IMPLICATIONS: Future research should examine the effect of prognostic communication on psychological well-being over time and treatment decision-making, and focus on individualising care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7181418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71814182020-05-04 The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review van der Velden, Naomi C. A. Meijers, Maartje C. Han, Paul K. J. van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. Smets, Ellen M. A. Henselmans, Inge Curr Treat Options Oncol Palliative and Supportive Care (MP Davis, Section Editor) BACKGROUND: While prognostic information is considered important for treatment decision-making, physicians struggle to communicate prognosis to advanced cancer patients. This systematic review aimed to offer up-to-date, evidence-based guidance on prognostic communication in palliative oncology. METHODS: PubMed and PsycInfo were searched until September 2019 for literature on the association between prognostic disclosure (strategies) and patient outcomes in palliative cancer care, and its moderators. Methodological quality was reported. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included. Concerning prognostic disclosure, results revealed a positive association with patients’ prognostic awareness. Findings showed no or positive associations between prognostic disclosure and the physician-patient relationship or the discussion of care preferences. Evidence for an association with the documentation of care preferences or physical outcomes was lacking. Findings on the emotional consequences of prognostic disclosure were multifaceted. Concerning disclosure strategies, affective communication seemingly reduced patients' physiological arousal and improved perceived physician’s support. Affective and explicit communication showed no or beneficial effects on patients’ psychological well-being and satisfaction. Communicating multiple survival scenarios improved prognostic understanding. Physicians displaying expertise, positivity and collaboration fostered hope. Evidence on demographic, clinical and personality factors moderating the effect of prognostic communication was weak. CONCLUSION: If preferred by patients, physicians could disclose prognosis using sensible strategies. The combination of explicit and affective communication, multiple survival scenarios and expert, positive, collaborative behaviour likely benefits most patients. Still, more evidence is needed, and tailoring communication to individual patients is warranted. IMPLICATIONS: Future research should examine the effect of prognostic communication on psychological well-being over time and treatment decision-making, and focus on individualising care. Springer US 2020-04-23 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7181418/ /pubmed/32328821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11864-020-00742-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Palliative and Supportive Care (MP Davis, Section Editor)
van der Velden, Naomi C. A.
Meijers, Maartje C.
Han, Paul K. J.
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
Smets, Ellen M. A.
Henselmans, Inge
The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review
title The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review
title_full The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review
title_short The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review
title_sort effect of prognostic communication on patient outcomes in palliative cancer care: a systematic review
topic Palliative and Supportive Care (MP Davis, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7181418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11864-020-00742-y
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderveldennaomica theeffectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview
AT meijersmaartjec theeffectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview
AT hanpaulkj theeffectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview
AT vanlaarhovenhannekewm theeffectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview
AT smetsellenma theeffectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview
AT henselmansinge theeffectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview
AT vanderveldennaomica effectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview
AT meijersmaartjec effectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview
AT hanpaulkj effectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview
AT vanlaarhovenhannekewm effectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview
AT smetsellenma effectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview
AT henselmansinge effectofprognosticcommunicationonpatientoutcomesinpalliativecancercareasystematicreview