Cargando…

Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center

PURPOSE: Second opinions in oncology are becoming increasingly important in an era of more complex treatments and a growing demand for information by patients. Therefore, we analyzed their effects and influencing factors like patients’ motives, subjective extent of information and satisfaction with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loehberg, Christian R., Meyer, Julia, Häberle, Lothar, Hack, Carolin C., Jud, Sebastian, Hein, Alexander, Wunderle, Marius, Emons, Julius, Gass, Paul, Fasching, Peter A., Egloffstein, Sainab, Krebs, Jessica, Erim, Yesim, Beckmann, Matthias W., Lux, Michael P., Wasner, Sonja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7181428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32274639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05525-2
_version_ 1783526037988048896
author Loehberg, Christian R.
Meyer, Julia
Häberle, Lothar
Hack, Carolin C.
Jud, Sebastian
Hein, Alexander
Wunderle, Marius
Emons, Julius
Gass, Paul
Fasching, Peter A.
Egloffstein, Sainab
Krebs, Jessica
Erim, Yesim
Beckmann, Matthias W.
Lux, Michael P.
Wasner, Sonja
author_facet Loehberg, Christian R.
Meyer, Julia
Häberle, Lothar
Hack, Carolin C.
Jud, Sebastian
Hein, Alexander
Wunderle, Marius
Emons, Julius
Gass, Paul
Fasching, Peter A.
Egloffstein, Sainab
Krebs, Jessica
Erim, Yesim
Beckmann, Matthias W.
Lux, Michael P.
Wasner, Sonja
author_sort Loehberg, Christian R.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Second opinions in oncology are becoming increasingly important in an era of more complex treatments and a growing demand for information by patients. Therefore, we analyzed their effects and influencing factors like patients’ motives, subjective extent of information and satisfaction with communications. METHODS: This prospective study evaluated second opinions for patients with breast cancer or gynecological malignancy. The patients received a questionnaire before and two months after, which inquired expectations, reasons, and satisfaction with the second opinion and the attending physicians. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were included and the majority had breast cancer (75.0%). Receiving the second opinion made 89.7% feel better informed, their need for information decreased (from 75.3% to 39.2%, P < 0.0001), and satisfaction with doctor–patient communications increased (from 61.9 to 91.8%, P = 0.0002). There were various reasons for requesting a second opinion, e.g., the extremely stressful situation of a cancer diagnosis, hope for change in the treatment recommendation or dissatisfaction with the initial physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Second opinions can lead to significantly greater patient satisfaction, meeting the need for information and leading to better management of patients in the extremely stressful situation of a cancer diagnosis. Doctor–patient communications play a key role. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00404-020-05525-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7181428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71814282020-04-29 Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center Loehberg, Christian R. Meyer, Julia Häberle, Lothar Hack, Carolin C. Jud, Sebastian Hein, Alexander Wunderle, Marius Emons, Julius Gass, Paul Fasching, Peter A. Egloffstein, Sainab Krebs, Jessica Erim, Yesim Beckmann, Matthias W. Lux, Michael P. Wasner, Sonja Arch Gynecol Obstet Gynecologic Oncology PURPOSE: Second opinions in oncology are becoming increasingly important in an era of more complex treatments and a growing demand for information by patients. Therefore, we analyzed their effects and influencing factors like patients’ motives, subjective extent of information and satisfaction with communications. METHODS: This prospective study evaluated second opinions for patients with breast cancer or gynecological malignancy. The patients received a questionnaire before and two months after, which inquired expectations, reasons, and satisfaction with the second opinion and the attending physicians. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were included and the majority had breast cancer (75.0%). Receiving the second opinion made 89.7% feel better informed, their need for information decreased (from 75.3% to 39.2%, P < 0.0001), and satisfaction with doctor–patient communications increased (from 61.9 to 91.8%, P = 0.0002). There were various reasons for requesting a second opinion, e.g., the extremely stressful situation of a cancer diagnosis, hope for change in the treatment recommendation or dissatisfaction with the initial physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Second opinions can lead to significantly greater patient satisfaction, meeting the need for information and leading to better management of patients in the extremely stressful situation of a cancer diagnosis. Doctor–patient communications play a key role. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00404-020-05525-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-04-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7181428/ /pubmed/32274639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05525-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Gynecologic Oncology
Loehberg, Christian R.
Meyer, Julia
Häberle, Lothar
Hack, Carolin C.
Jud, Sebastian
Hein, Alexander
Wunderle, Marius
Emons, Julius
Gass, Paul
Fasching, Peter A.
Egloffstein, Sainab
Krebs, Jessica
Erim, Yesim
Beckmann, Matthias W.
Lux, Michael P.
Wasner, Sonja
Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center
title Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center
title_full Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center
title_fullStr Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center
title_short Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center
title_sort analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center
topic Gynecologic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7181428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32274639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05525-2
work_keys_str_mv AT loehbergchristianr analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter
AT meyerjulia analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter
AT haberlelothar analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter
AT hackcarolinc analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter
AT judsebastian analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter
AT heinalexander analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter
AT wunderlemarius analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter
AT emonsjulius analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter
AT gasspaul analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter
AT faschingpetera analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter
AT egloffsteinsainab analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter
AT krebsjessica analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter
AT erimyesim analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter
AT beckmannmatthiasw analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter
AT luxmichaelp analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter
AT wasnersonja analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter