Cargando…
Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center
PURPOSE: Second opinions in oncology are becoming increasingly important in an era of more complex treatments and a growing demand for information by patients. Therefore, we analyzed their effects and influencing factors like patients’ motives, subjective extent of information and satisfaction with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7181428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32274639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05525-2 |
_version_ | 1783526037988048896 |
---|---|
author | Loehberg, Christian R. Meyer, Julia Häberle, Lothar Hack, Carolin C. Jud, Sebastian Hein, Alexander Wunderle, Marius Emons, Julius Gass, Paul Fasching, Peter A. Egloffstein, Sainab Krebs, Jessica Erim, Yesim Beckmann, Matthias W. Lux, Michael P. Wasner, Sonja |
author_facet | Loehberg, Christian R. Meyer, Julia Häberle, Lothar Hack, Carolin C. Jud, Sebastian Hein, Alexander Wunderle, Marius Emons, Julius Gass, Paul Fasching, Peter A. Egloffstein, Sainab Krebs, Jessica Erim, Yesim Beckmann, Matthias W. Lux, Michael P. Wasner, Sonja |
author_sort | Loehberg, Christian R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Second opinions in oncology are becoming increasingly important in an era of more complex treatments and a growing demand for information by patients. Therefore, we analyzed their effects and influencing factors like patients’ motives, subjective extent of information and satisfaction with communications. METHODS: This prospective study evaluated second opinions for patients with breast cancer or gynecological malignancy. The patients received a questionnaire before and two months after, which inquired expectations, reasons, and satisfaction with the second opinion and the attending physicians. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were included and the majority had breast cancer (75.0%). Receiving the second opinion made 89.7% feel better informed, their need for information decreased (from 75.3% to 39.2%, P < 0.0001), and satisfaction with doctor–patient communications increased (from 61.9 to 91.8%, P = 0.0002). There were various reasons for requesting a second opinion, e.g., the extremely stressful situation of a cancer diagnosis, hope for change in the treatment recommendation or dissatisfaction with the initial physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Second opinions can lead to significantly greater patient satisfaction, meeting the need for information and leading to better management of patients in the extremely stressful situation of a cancer diagnosis. Doctor–patient communications play a key role. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00404-020-05525-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7181428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71814282020-04-29 Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center Loehberg, Christian R. Meyer, Julia Häberle, Lothar Hack, Carolin C. Jud, Sebastian Hein, Alexander Wunderle, Marius Emons, Julius Gass, Paul Fasching, Peter A. Egloffstein, Sainab Krebs, Jessica Erim, Yesim Beckmann, Matthias W. Lux, Michael P. Wasner, Sonja Arch Gynecol Obstet Gynecologic Oncology PURPOSE: Second opinions in oncology are becoming increasingly important in an era of more complex treatments and a growing demand for information by patients. Therefore, we analyzed their effects and influencing factors like patients’ motives, subjective extent of information and satisfaction with communications. METHODS: This prospective study evaluated second opinions for patients with breast cancer or gynecological malignancy. The patients received a questionnaire before and two months after, which inquired expectations, reasons, and satisfaction with the second opinion and the attending physicians. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were included and the majority had breast cancer (75.0%). Receiving the second opinion made 89.7% feel better informed, their need for information decreased (from 75.3% to 39.2%, P < 0.0001), and satisfaction with doctor–patient communications increased (from 61.9 to 91.8%, P = 0.0002). There were various reasons for requesting a second opinion, e.g., the extremely stressful situation of a cancer diagnosis, hope for change in the treatment recommendation or dissatisfaction with the initial physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Second opinions can lead to significantly greater patient satisfaction, meeting the need for information and leading to better management of patients in the extremely stressful situation of a cancer diagnosis. Doctor–patient communications play a key role. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00404-020-05525-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-04-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7181428/ /pubmed/32274639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05525-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Gynecologic Oncology Loehberg, Christian R. Meyer, Julia Häberle, Lothar Hack, Carolin C. Jud, Sebastian Hein, Alexander Wunderle, Marius Emons, Julius Gass, Paul Fasching, Peter A. Egloffstein, Sainab Krebs, Jessica Erim, Yesim Beckmann, Matthias W. Lux, Michael P. Wasner, Sonja Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center |
title | Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center |
title_full | Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center |
title_fullStr | Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center |
title_short | Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center |
title_sort | analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center |
topic | Gynecologic Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7181428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32274639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05525-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loehbergchristianr analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter AT meyerjulia analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter AT haberlelothar analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter AT hackcarolinc analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter AT judsebastian analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter AT heinalexander analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter AT wunderlemarius analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter AT emonsjulius analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter AT gasspaul analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter AT faschingpetera analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter AT egloffsteinsainab analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter AT krebsjessica analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter AT erimyesim analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter AT beckmannmatthiasw analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter AT luxmichaelp analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter AT wasnersonja analysisofmotivesandpatientsatisfactioninoncologicalsecondopinionsprovidedbyacertifieduniversitybreastandgynecologicalcancercenter |