Cargando…
Do sounds near the hand facilitate tactile reaction times? Four experiments and a meta-analysis provide mixed support and suggest a small effect size
The brain represents the space immediately surrounding the body differently to more distant parts of space. Direct evidence for this ‘peripersonal space’ representation comes from neurophysiological studies in monkeys, which show distance-dependent responses to visual stimuli in neurons with spatial...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7181441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32193585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05771-5 |
_version_ | 1783526041000607744 |
---|---|
author | Holmes, Nicholas Paul Martin, Dennis Mitchell, William Noorani, Zeeshan Thorne, Amber |
author_facet | Holmes, Nicholas Paul Martin, Dennis Mitchell, William Noorani, Zeeshan Thorne, Amber |
author_sort | Holmes, Nicholas Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | The brain represents the space immediately surrounding the body differently to more distant parts of space. Direct evidence for this ‘peripersonal space’ representation comes from neurophysiological studies in monkeys, which show distance-dependent responses to visual stimuli in neurons with spatially coincident tactile responses. Most evidence for peripersonal space in humans is indirect: spatial- and distance-dependent modulations of reaction times and error rates in behavioural tasks. In one task often used to assess peripersonal space, sounds near the body have been argued to speed reactions to tactile stimuli. We conducted four experiments attempting to measure this distance-dependent audiotactile interaction. We found no distance-dependent enhancement of tactile processing in error rates or task performance, but found some evidence for a general speeding of reaction times by 9.5 ms when sounds were presented near the hand. A systematic review revealed an overestimation of reported effect sizes, lack of control conditions, a wide variety of methods, post hoc removal of data, and flexible methods of data analysis. After correcting for the speed of sound, removing biased or inconclusive studies, correcting for temporal expectancy, and using the trim-and-fill method to correct for publication bias, meta-analysis revealed an overall benefit of 15.2 ms when tactile stimuli are accompanied by near sounds compared to sounds further away. While this effect may be due to peripersonal space, response probability and the number of trials per condition explained significant proportions of variance in this near versus far benefit. These confounds need to be addressed, and alternative explanations ruled out by future, ideally pre-registered, studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00221-020-05771-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7181441 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71814412020-04-29 Do sounds near the hand facilitate tactile reaction times? Four experiments and a meta-analysis provide mixed support and suggest a small effect size Holmes, Nicholas Paul Martin, Dennis Mitchell, William Noorani, Zeeshan Thorne, Amber Exp Brain Res Research Article The brain represents the space immediately surrounding the body differently to more distant parts of space. Direct evidence for this ‘peripersonal space’ representation comes from neurophysiological studies in monkeys, which show distance-dependent responses to visual stimuli in neurons with spatially coincident tactile responses. Most evidence for peripersonal space in humans is indirect: spatial- and distance-dependent modulations of reaction times and error rates in behavioural tasks. In one task often used to assess peripersonal space, sounds near the body have been argued to speed reactions to tactile stimuli. We conducted four experiments attempting to measure this distance-dependent audiotactile interaction. We found no distance-dependent enhancement of tactile processing in error rates or task performance, but found some evidence for a general speeding of reaction times by 9.5 ms when sounds were presented near the hand. A systematic review revealed an overestimation of reported effect sizes, lack of control conditions, a wide variety of methods, post hoc removal of data, and flexible methods of data analysis. After correcting for the speed of sound, removing biased or inconclusive studies, correcting for temporal expectancy, and using the trim-and-fill method to correct for publication bias, meta-analysis revealed an overall benefit of 15.2 ms when tactile stimuli are accompanied by near sounds compared to sounds further away. While this effect may be due to peripersonal space, response probability and the number of trials per condition explained significant proportions of variance in this near versus far benefit. These confounds need to be addressed, and alternative explanations ruled out by future, ideally pre-registered, studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00221-020-05771-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-03-19 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7181441/ /pubmed/32193585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05771-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Holmes, Nicholas Paul Martin, Dennis Mitchell, William Noorani, Zeeshan Thorne, Amber Do sounds near the hand facilitate tactile reaction times? Four experiments and a meta-analysis provide mixed support and suggest a small effect size |
title | Do sounds near the hand facilitate tactile reaction times? Four experiments and a meta-analysis provide mixed support and suggest a small effect size |
title_full | Do sounds near the hand facilitate tactile reaction times? Four experiments and a meta-analysis provide mixed support and suggest a small effect size |
title_fullStr | Do sounds near the hand facilitate tactile reaction times? Four experiments and a meta-analysis provide mixed support and suggest a small effect size |
title_full_unstemmed | Do sounds near the hand facilitate tactile reaction times? Four experiments and a meta-analysis provide mixed support and suggest a small effect size |
title_short | Do sounds near the hand facilitate tactile reaction times? Four experiments and a meta-analysis provide mixed support and suggest a small effect size |
title_sort | do sounds near the hand facilitate tactile reaction times? four experiments and a meta-analysis provide mixed support and suggest a small effect size |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7181441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32193585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05771-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holmesnicholaspaul dosoundsnearthehandfacilitatetactilereactiontimesfourexperimentsandametaanalysisprovidemixedsupportandsuggestasmalleffectsize AT martindennis dosoundsnearthehandfacilitatetactilereactiontimesfourexperimentsandametaanalysisprovidemixedsupportandsuggestasmalleffectsize AT mitchellwilliam dosoundsnearthehandfacilitatetactilereactiontimesfourexperimentsandametaanalysisprovidemixedsupportandsuggestasmalleffectsize AT nooranizeeshan dosoundsnearthehandfacilitatetactilereactiontimesfourexperimentsandametaanalysisprovidemixedsupportandsuggestasmalleffectsize AT thorneamber dosoundsnearthehandfacilitatetactilereactiontimesfourexperimentsandametaanalysisprovidemixedsupportandsuggestasmalleffectsize |