Cargando…

Dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why?

Self-control has been shown to be linked with being cooperative and successful in humans and with the g-factor in chimpanzees. As such, it is likely to play an important role in all forms of problem-solving. Self-control, however, does not just vary across individuals but seems also to be dependent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Range, Friederike, Brucks, Désirée, Virányi, Zsófia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7181554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32060750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01346-7
_version_ 1783526063889973248
author Range, Friederike
Brucks, Désirée
Virányi, Zsófia
author_facet Range, Friederike
Brucks, Désirée
Virányi, Zsófia
author_sort Range, Friederike
collection PubMed
description Self-control has been shown to be linked with being cooperative and successful in humans and with the g-factor in chimpanzees. As such, it is likely to play an important role in all forms of problem-solving. Self-control, however, does not just vary across individuals but seems also to be dependent on the ecological niche of the respective species. With dogs having been selected to live in the human environment, several domestication hypotheses have predicted that dogs are better at self-control and thus more tolerant of longer delays than wolves. Here we set out to test this prediction by comparing dogs’ and wolves’ self-control abilities using a delay of gratification task where the animals had to wait for a predefined delay duration to exchange a low-quality reward for a high-quality reward. We found that in our task, dogs outperformed the wolves waiting an average of 66 s vs. 24 s in the wolves. Food quality did not influence how long the animals waited for the better reward. However, dogs performed overall better in motivation trials than the wolves, although the dogs’ performance in those trials was dependent on the duration of the delays in the test trials, whereas this was not the case for the wolves. Overall, the data suggest that selection by humans for traits influencing self-control rather than ecological factors might drive self-control abilities in wolves and dogs. However, several other factors might contribute or explain the observed differences including the presence of the humans, which might have inhibited the dogs more than the wolves, lower motivation of the wolves compared to the dogs to participate in the task and/or wolves having a better understanding of the task contingencies. These possible explanations need further exploration. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10071-020-01346-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7181554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71815542020-04-29 Dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why? Range, Friederike Brucks, Désirée Virányi, Zsófia Anim Cogn Original Paper Self-control has been shown to be linked with being cooperative and successful in humans and with the g-factor in chimpanzees. As such, it is likely to play an important role in all forms of problem-solving. Self-control, however, does not just vary across individuals but seems also to be dependent on the ecological niche of the respective species. With dogs having been selected to live in the human environment, several domestication hypotheses have predicted that dogs are better at self-control and thus more tolerant of longer delays than wolves. Here we set out to test this prediction by comparing dogs’ and wolves’ self-control abilities using a delay of gratification task where the animals had to wait for a predefined delay duration to exchange a low-quality reward for a high-quality reward. We found that in our task, dogs outperformed the wolves waiting an average of 66 s vs. 24 s in the wolves. Food quality did not influence how long the animals waited for the better reward. However, dogs performed overall better in motivation trials than the wolves, although the dogs’ performance in those trials was dependent on the duration of the delays in the test trials, whereas this was not the case for the wolves. Overall, the data suggest that selection by humans for traits influencing self-control rather than ecological factors might drive self-control abilities in wolves and dogs. However, several other factors might contribute or explain the observed differences including the presence of the humans, which might have inhibited the dogs more than the wolves, lower motivation of the wolves compared to the dogs to participate in the task and/or wolves having a better understanding of the task contingencies. These possible explanations need further exploration. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10071-020-01346-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-14 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7181554/ /pubmed/32060750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01346-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Range, Friederike
Brucks, Désirée
Virányi, Zsófia
Dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why?
title Dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why?
title_full Dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why?
title_fullStr Dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why?
title_full_unstemmed Dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why?
title_short Dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why?
title_sort dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why?
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7181554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32060750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01346-7
work_keys_str_mv AT rangefriederike dogswaitlongerforbetterrewardsthanwolvesinadelayofgratificationtaskbutwhy
AT brucksdesiree dogswaitlongerforbetterrewardsthanwolvesinadelayofgratificationtaskbutwhy
AT viranyizsofia dogswaitlongerforbetterrewardsthanwolvesinadelayofgratificationtaskbutwhy