Cargando…
Dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why?
Self-control has been shown to be linked with being cooperative and successful in humans and with the g-factor in chimpanzees. As such, it is likely to play an important role in all forms of problem-solving. Self-control, however, does not just vary across individuals but seems also to be dependent...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7181554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32060750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01346-7 |
_version_ | 1783526063889973248 |
---|---|
author | Range, Friederike Brucks, Désirée Virányi, Zsófia |
author_facet | Range, Friederike Brucks, Désirée Virányi, Zsófia |
author_sort | Range, Friederike |
collection | PubMed |
description | Self-control has been shown to be linked with being cooperative and successful in humans and with the g-factor in chimpanzees. As such, it is likely to play an important role in all forms of problem-solving. Self-control, however, does not just vary across individuals but seems also to be dependent on the ecological niche of the respective species. With dogs having been selected to live in the human environment, several domestication hypotheses have predicted that dogs are better at self-control and thus more tolerant of longer delays than wolves. Here we set out to test this prediction by comparing dogs’ and wolves’ self-control abilities using a delay of gratification task where the animals had to wait for a predefined delay duration to exchange a low-quality reward for a high-quality reward. We found that in our task, dogs outperformed the wolves waiting an average of 66 s vs. 24 s in the wolves. Food quality did not influence how long the animals waited for the better reward. However, dogs performed overall better in motivation trials than the wolves, although the dogs’ performance in those trials was dependent on the duration of the delays in the test trials, whereas this was not the case for the wolves. Overall, the data suggest that selection by humans for traits influencing self-control rather than ecological factors might drive self-control abilities in wolves and dogs. However, several other factors might contribute or explain the observed differences including the presence of the humans, which might have inhibited the dogs more than the wolves, lower motivation of the wolves compared to the dogs to participate in the task and/or wolves having a better understanding of the task contingencies. These possible explanations need further exploration. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10071-020-01346-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7181554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71815542020-04-29 Dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why? Range, Friederike Brucks, Désirée Virányi, Zsófia Anim Cogn Original Paper Self-control has been shown to be linked with being cooperative and successful in humans and with the g-factor in chimpanzees. As such, it is likely to play an important role in all forms of problem-solving. Self-control, however, does not just vary across individuals but seems also to be dependent on the ecological niche of the respective species. With dogs having been selected to live in the human environment, several domestication hypotheses have predicted that dogs are better at self-control and thus more tolerant of longer delays than wolves. Here we set out to test this prediction by comparing dogs’ and wolves’ self-control abilities using a delay of gratification task where the animals had to wait for a predefined delay duration to exchange a low-quality reward for a high-quality reward. We found that in our task, dogs outperformed the wolves waiting an average of 66 s vs. 24 s in the wolves. Food quality did not influence how long the animals waited for the better reward. However, dogs performed overall better in motivation trials than the wolves, although the dogs’ performance in those trials was dependent on the duration of the delays in the test trials, whereas this was not the case for the wolves. Overall, the data suggest that selection by humans for traits influencing self-control rather than ecological factors might drive self-control abilities in wolves and dogs. However, several other factors might contribute or explain the observed differences including the presence of the humans, which might have inhibited the dogs more than the wolves, lower motivation of the wolves compared to the dogs to participate in the task and/or wolves having a better understanding of the task contingencies. These possible explanations need further exploration. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10071-020-01346-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-14 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7181554/ /pubmed/32060750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01346-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Range, Friederike Brucks, Désirée Virányi, Zsófia Dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why? |
title | Dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why? |
title_full | Dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why? |
title_fullStr | Dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why? |
title_full_unstemmed | Dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why? |
title_short | Dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why? |
title_sort | dogs wait longer for better rewards than wolves in a delay of gratification task: but why? |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7181554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32060750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01346-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rangefriederike dogswaitlongerforbetterrewardsthanwolvesinadelayofgratificationtaskbutwhy AT brucksdesiree dogswaitlongerforbetterrewardsthanwolvesinadelayofgratificationtaskbutwhy AT viranyizsofia dogswaitlongerforbetterrewardsthanwolvesinadelayofgratificationtaskbutwhy |