Cargando…
Why do dogs look back at the human in an impossible task? Looking back behaviour may be over-interpreted
The impossible task paradigm has been extensively used to study the looking back behaviour in dogs. This behaviour is commonly considered a social problem-solving strategy: dogs facing an unsolvable task, soon give up and look back at the experimenter to ask for help. We aimed to test if the looking...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7181563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01345-8 |
_version_ | 1783526066073108480 |
---|---|
author | Lazzaroni, Martina Marshall-Pescini, Sarah Manzenreiter, Helena Gosch, Sarah Přibilová, Lucy Darc, Larissa McGetrick, Jim Range, Friederike |
author_facet | Lazzaroni, Martina Marshall-Pescini, Sarah Manzenreiter, Helena Gosch, Sarah Přibilová, Lucy Darc, Larissa McGetrick, Jim Range, Friederike |
author_sort | Lazzaroni, Martina |
collection | PubMed |
description | The impossible task paradigm has been extensively used to study the looking back behaviour in dogs. This behaviour is commonly considered a social problem-solving strategy: dogs facing an unsolvable task, soon give up and look back at the experimenter to ask for help. We aimed to test if the looking back in an impossible task does indeed represent a social problem-solving strategy. We used a modified version of the classic impossible task, in which the subjects simultaneously faced three possible and one impossible trials. Additionally, subjects were tested in four different conditions: social condition (with an unknown experimenter); asocial condition (subject alone); 'dummy' human condition (with a ‘dummy’ human); object condition (with a big sheet of cardboard). Finally, we compared two populations of dogs differing in their experience of receiving help from humans: 20 pet dogs tested in their houses and 31 free-ranging dogs tested in Morocco. We found that the pet dogs and free-ranging dogs had similar persistence in interacting with the impossible task in all conditions. Moreover, subjects looked back with similar latencies at the human, at the dummy human and at the object. Overall, pet dogs looked back longer at the human than free-ranging dogs. This could be interpreted as pet dogs being more attracted to humans and/or having a stronger association between humans and food than free-ranging dogs. Concluding, the looking back in an impossible task does not represent a problem-solving strategy. This behaviour seems rather linked to the subject’s persistence, to the salience of the stimuli presented, and potentially to the past reinforcement history. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10071-020-01345-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7181563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71815632020-04-29 Why do dogs look back at the human in an impossible task? Looking back behaviour may be over-interpreted Lazzaroni, Martina Marshall-Pescini, Sarah Manzenreiter, Helena Gosch, Sarah Přibilová, Lucy Darc, Larissa McGetrick, Jim Range, Friederike Anim Cogn Original Paper The impossible task paradigm has been extensively used to study the looking back behaviour in dogs. This behaviour is commonly considered a social problem-solving strategy: dogs facing an unsolvable task, soon give up and look back at the experimenter to ask for help. We aimed to test if the looking back in an impossible task does indeed represent a social problem-solving strategy. We used a modified version of the classic impossible task, in which the subjects simultaneously faced three possible and one impossible trials. Additionally, subjects were tested in four different conditions: social condition (with an unknown experimenter); asocial condition (subject alone); 'dummy' human condition (with a ‘dummy’ human); object condition (with a big sheet of cardboard). Finally, we compared two populations of dogs differing in their experience of receiving help from humans: 20 pet dogs tested in their houses and 31 free-ranging dogs tested in Morocco. We found that the pet dogs and free-ranging dogs had similar persistence in interacting with the impossible task in all conditions. Moreover, subjects looked back with similar latencies at the human, at the dummy human and at the object. Overall, pet dogs looked back longer at the human than free-ranging dogs. This could be interpreted as pet dogs being more attracted to humans and/or having a stronger association between humans and food than free-ranging dogs. Concluding, the looking back in an impossible task does not represent a problem-solving strategy. This behaviour seems rather linked to the subject’s persistence, to the salience of the stimuli presented, and potentially to the past reinforcement history. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10071-020-01345-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-23 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7181563/ /pubmed/32090291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01345-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Lazzaroni, Martina Marshall-Pescini, Sarah Manzenreiter, Helena Gosch, Sarah Přibilová, Lucy Darc, Larissa McGetrick, Jim Range, Friederike Why do dogs look back at the human in an impossible task? Looking back behaviour may be over-interpreted |
title | Why do dogs look back at the human in an impossible task? Looking back behaviour may be over-interpreted |
title_full | Why do dogs look back at the human in an impossible task? Looking back behaviour may be over-interpreted |
title_fullStr | Why do dogs look back at the human in an impossible task? Looking back behaviour may be over-interpreted |
title_full_unstemmed | Why do dogs look back at the human in an impossible task? Looking back behaviour may be over-interpreted |
title_short | Why do dogs look back at the human in an impossible task? Looking back behaviour may be over-interpreted |
title_sort | why do dogs look back at the human in an impossible task? looking back behaviour may be over-interpreted |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7181563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01345-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lazzaronimartina whydodogslookbackatthehumaninanimpossibletasklookingbackbehaviourmaybeoverinterpreted AT marshallpescinisarah whydodogslookbackatthehumaninanimpossibletasklookingbackbehaviourmaybeoverinterpreted AT manzenreiterhelena whydodogslookbackatthehumaninanimpossibletasklookingbackbehaviourmaybeoverinterpreted AT goschsarah whydodogslookbackatthehumaninanimpossibletasklookingbackbehaviourmaybeoverinterpreted AT pribilovalucy whydodogslookbackatthehumaninanimpossibletasklookingbackbehaviourmaybeoverinterpreted AT darclarissa whydodogslookbackatthehumaninanimpossibletasklookingbackbehaviourmaybeoverinterpreted AT mcgetrickjim whydodogslookbackatthehumaninanimpossibletasklookingbackbehaviourmaybeoverinterpreted AT rangefriederike whydodogslookbackatthehumaninanimpossibletasklookingbackbehaviourmaybeoverinterpreted |