Cargando…

Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS Trusts

Background: Healthcare organisations in England rated as inadequate in terms of leadership and one other domain enter the Special Measures for Quality (SMQ) regime to receive increased support and oversight. There is also a ‘watch list’ of challenged National Health Service (NHS) providers at risk o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fulop, Naomi, Barbosa, Estela Capelas, Hill, Melissa, Ledger, Jean, Sherlaw-Johnson, Christopher, Spencer, Jonathan, Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia, Morris, Steve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32331494
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2019.100
_version_ 1783526186546102272
author Fulop, Naomi
Barbosa, Estela Capelas
Hill, Melissa
Ledger, Jean
Sherlaw-Johnson, Christopher
Spencer, Jonathan
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
Morris, Steve
author_facet Fulop, Naomi
Barbosa, Estela Capelas
Hill, Melissa
Ledger, Jean
Sherlaw-Johnson, Christopher
Spencer, Jonathan
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
Morris, Steve
author_sort Fulop, Naomi
collection PubMed
description Background: Healthcare organisations in England rated as inadequate in terms of leadership and one other domain enter the Special Measures for Quality (SMQ) regime to receive increased support and oversight. There is also a ‘watch list’ of challenged National Health Service (NHS) providers at risk of going into SMQ that receive support. There is limited knowledge about whether the interventions used to deliver this support drive improvements in quality, their costs, and whether they strike the right balance between support and scrutiny. The study will seek to determine how provider organisations respond to these interventions, and whether and how these interventions impact organisations’ capacity to achieve and sustain quality improvements over time. Methods: This is a multi-site, mixed methods study. We will carry out interviews at national level to understand the programme theory underpinning the interventions. We will conduct 8 NHS case studies to explore the impact and implementation of the interventions that form part of the SMQ and challenged providers programme. We will use a conceptual framework based on models of organisational readiness for change and draw on board maturity research for implementing quality improvement. We will also review the use of quantitative metrics and data for tracking the progress of improvements in quality of care and sustainability upon leaving SMQ, as well as the costs and benefits of the interventions through a cost-consequence analysis (CCA). Discussion: High-quality interventions that successfully support struggling healthcare organisations are essential and an issue that is an international concern. Our study will allow a greater understanding of the programme theory, impact, and staff views and experiences of the SMQ and challenged providers regime. Formative feedback will be reported to key stakeholders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7182148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71821482020-04-29 Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS Trusts Fulop, Naomi Barbosa, Estela Capelas Hill, Melissa Ledger, Jean Sherlaw-Johnson, Christopher Spencer, Jonathan Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia Morris, Steve Int J Health Policy Manag Study Protocol Background: Healthcare organisations in England rated as inadequate in terms of leadership and one other domain enter the Special Measures for Quality (SMQ) regime to receive increased support and oversight. There is also a ‘watch list’ of challenged National Health Service (NHS) providers at risk of going into SMQ that receive support. There is limited knowledge about whether the interventions used to deliver this support drive improvements in quality, their costs, and whether they strike the right balance between support and scrutiny. The study will seek to determine how provider organisations respond to these interventions, and whether and how these interventions impact organisations’ capacity to achieve and sustain quality improvements over time. Methods: This is a multi-site, mixed methods study. We will carry out interviews at national level to understand the programme theory underpinning the interventions. We will conduct 8 NHS case studies to explore the impact and implementation of the interventions that form part of the SMQ and challenged providers programme. We will use a conceptual framework based on models of organisational readiness for change and draw on board maturity research for implementing quality improvement. We will also review the use of quantitative metrics and data for tracking the progress of improvements in quality of care and sustainability upon leaving SMQ, as well as the costs and benefits of the interventions through a cost-consequence analysis (CCA). Discussion: High-quality interventions that successfully support struggling healthcare organisations are essential and an issue that is an international concern. Our study will allow a greater understanding of the programme theory, impact, and staff views and experiences of the SMQ and challenged providers regime. Formative feedback will be reported to key stakeholders. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2019-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7182148/ /pubmed/32331494 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2019.100 Text en © 2020 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Fulop, Naomi
Barbosa, Estela Capelas
Hill, Melissa
Ledger, Jean
Sherlaw-Johnson, Christopher
Spencer, Jonathan
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
Morris, Steve
Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS Trusts
title Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS Trusts
title_full Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS Trusts
title_fullStr Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS Trusts
title_full_unstemmed Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS Trusts
title_short Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS Trusts
title_sort special measures for quality and challenged providers: study protocol for evaluating the impact of improvement interventions in nhs trusts
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32331494
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2019.100
work_keys_str_mv AT fulopnaomi specialmeasuresforqualityandchallengedprovidersstudyprotocolforevaluatingtheimpactofimprovementinterventionsinnhstrusts
AT barbosaestelacapelas specialmeasuresforqualityandchallengedprovidersstudyprotocolforevaluatingtheimpactofimprovementinterventionsinnhstrusts
AT hillmelissa specialmeasuresforqualityandchallengedprovidersstudyprotocolforevaluatingtheimpactofimprovementinterventionsinnhstrusts
AT ledgerjean specialmeasuresforqualityandchallengedprovidersstudyprotocolforevaluatingtheimpactofimprovementinterventionsinnhstrusts
AT sherlawjohnsonchristopher specialmeasuresforqualityandchallengedprovidersstudyprotocolforevaluatingtheimpactofimprovementinterventionsinnhstrusts
AT spencerjonathan specialmeasuresforqualityandchallengedprovidersstudyprotocolforevaluatingtheimpactofimprovementinterventionsinnhstrusts
AT vindrolapadroscecilia specialmeasuresforqualityandchallengedprovidersstudyprotocolforevaluatingtheimpactofimprovementinterventionsinnhstrusts
AT morrissteve specialmeasuresforqualityandchallengedprovidersstudyprotocolforevaluatingtheimpactofimprovementinterventionsinnhstrusts