Cargando…

Reintroducing B. infantis to the cesarean‐born neonate: an ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding”

There is a burgeoning literature highlighting differences in health outcomes between babies born vaginally and by caesarean section (c-section) This has led to the suggestion that infants born by c-section may benefit from vaginal swabbing/seeding. Here, we discuss from an ecological perspective tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duar, Rebbeca M, Kyle, David, Tribe, Rachel M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32068827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnaa032
_version_ 1783526233232900096
author Duar, Rebbeca M
Kyle, David
Tribe, Rachel M
author_facet Duar, Rebbeca M
Kyle, David
Tribe, Rachel M
author_sort Duar, Rebbeca M
collection PubMed
description There is a burgeoning literature highlighting differences in health outcomes between babies born vaginally and by caesarean section (c-section) This has led to the suggestion that infants born by c-section may benefit from vaginal swabbing/seeding. Here, we discuss from an ecological perspective that it is gut-adapted, not vagina-adapted microbes that are likely to take up residence in the gut and have the most beneficial impact on the developing neonate. Further, we caution the practice of ‘vaginal seeding’ may be potentially unsafe and also give parents and health professionals a false sense of action in restoring the infant gut microbiome following c-section. Instead, we argue that restoring B. longum subsp. infantis, which has evolved to colonize the infant gut, is a safe and ecologically-sound approach to restoring the gut microbiome of infants born by c-section.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7182402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71824022020-04-29 Reintroducing B. infantis to the cesarean‐born neonate: an ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding” Duar, Rebbeca M Kyle, David Tribe, Rachel M FEMS Microbiol Lett Current opinion There is a burgeoning literature highlighting differences in health outcomes between babies born vaginally and by caesarean section (c-section) This has led to the suggestion that infants born by c-section may benefit from vaginal swabbing/seeding. Here, we discuss from an ecological perspective that it is gut-adapted, not vagina-adapted microbes that are likely to take up residence in the gut and have the most beneficial impact on the developing neonate. Further, we caution the practice of ‘vaginal seeding’ may be potentially unsafe and also give parents and health professionals a false sense of action in restoring the infant gut microbiome following c-section. Instead, we argue that restoring B. longum subsp. infantis, which has evolved to colonize the infant gut, is a safe and ecologically-sound approach to restoring the gut microbiome of infants born by c-section. Oxford University Press 2020-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7182402/ /pubmed/32068827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnaa032 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of FEMS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Current opinion
Duar, Rebbeca M
Kyle, David
Tribe, Rachel M
Reintroducing B. infantis to the cesarean‐born neonate: an ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding”
title Reintroducing B. infantis to the cesarean‐born neonate: an ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding”
title_full Reintroducing B. infantis to the cesarean‐born neonate: an ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding”
title_fullStr Reintroducing B. infantis to the cesarean‐born neonate: an ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding”
title_full_unstemmed Reintroducing B. infantis to the cesarean‐born neonate: an ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding”
title_short Reintroducing B. infantis to the cesarean‐born neonate: an ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding”
title_sort reintroducing b. infantis to the cesarean‐born neonate: an ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding”
topic Current opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32068827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnaa032
work_keys_str_mv AT duarrebbecam reintroducingbinfantistothecesareanbornneonateanecologicallysoundalternativetovaginalseeding
AT kyledavid reintroducingbinfantistothecesareanbornneonateanecologicallysoundalternativetovaginalseeding
AT triberachelm reintroducingbinfantistothecesareanbornneonateanecologicallysoundalternativetovaginalseeding