Cargando…
Reintroducing B. infantis to the cesarean‐born neonate: an ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding”
There is a burgeoning literature highlighting differences in health outcomes between babies born vaginally and by caesarean section (c-section) This has led to the suggestion that infants born by c-section may benefit from vaginal swabbing/seeding. Here, we discuss from an ecological perspective tha...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32068827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnaa032 |
_version_ | 1783526233232900096 |
---|---|
author | Duar, Rebbeca M Kyle, David Tribe, Rachel M |
author_facet | Duar, Rebbeca M Kyle, David Tribe, Rachel M |
author_sort | Duar, Rebbeca M |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a burgeoning literature highlighting differences in health outcomes between babies born vaginally and by caesarean section (c-section) This has led to the suggestion that infants born by c-section may benefit from vaginal swabbing/seeding. Here, we discuss from an ecological perspective that it is gut-adapted, not vagina-adapted microbes that are likely to take up residence in the gut and have the most beneficial impact on the developing neonate. Further, we caution the practice of ‘vaginal seeding’ may be potentially unsafe and also give parents and health professionals a false sense of action in restoring the infant gut microbiome following c-section. Instead, we argue that restoring B. longum subsp. infantis, which has evolved to colonize the infant gut, is a safe and ecologically-sound approach to restoring the gut microbiome of infants born by c-section. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7182402 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71824022020-04-29 Reintroducing B. infantis to the cesarean‐born neonate: an ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding” Duar, Rebbeca M Kyle, David Tribe, Rachel M FEMS Microbiol Lett Current opinion There is a burgeoning literature highlighting differences in health outcomes between babies born vaginally and by caesarean section (c-section) This has led to the suggestion that infants born by c-section may benefit from vaginal swabbing/seeding. Here, we discuss from an ecological perspective that it is gut-adapted, not vagina-adapted microbes that are likely to take up residence in the gut and have the most beneficial impact on the developing neonate. Further, we caution the practice of ‘vaginal seeding’ may be potentially unsafe and also give parents and health professionals a false sense of action in restoring the infant gut microbiome following c-section. Instead, we argue that restoring B. longum subsp. infantis, which has evolved to colonize the infant gut, is a safe and ecologically-sound approach to restoring the gut microbiome of infants born by c-section. Oxford University Press 2020-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7182402/ /pubmed/32068827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnaa032 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of FEMS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Current opinion Duar, Rebbeca M Kyle, David Tribe, Rachel M Reintroducing B. infantis to the cesarean‐born neonate: an ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding” |
title | Reintroducing B. infantis to the cesarean‐born neonate: an ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding” |
title_full | Reintroducing B. infantis to the cesarean‐born neonate: an ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding” |
title_fullStr | Reintroducing B. infantis to the cesarean‐born neonate: an ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding” |
title_full_unstemmed | Reintroducing B. infantis to the cesarean‐born neonate: an ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding” |
title_short | Reintroducing B. infantis to the cesarean‐born neonate: an ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding” |
title_sort | reintroducing b. infantis to the cesarean‐born neonate: an ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding” |
topic | Current opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32068827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnaa032 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duarrebbecam reintroducingbinfantistothecesareanbornneonateanecologicallysoundalternativetovaginalseeding AT kyledavid reintroducingbinfantistothecesareanbornneonateanecologicallysoundalternativetovaginalseeding AT triberachelm reintroducingbinfantistothecesareanbornneonateanecologicallysoundalternativetovaginalseeding |