Cargando…

The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health

PURPOSE: This study explored employer’s perspectives on (1) their experience of good practice related to workers diagnosed with cancer and their return to work (RTW), and (2) their perceived needs necessary to achieve good practice as reported by employers from nine separate countries. METHODS: Twen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Rijk, Angelique, Amir, Ziv, Cohen, Miri, Furlan, Tomislav, Godderis, Lode, Knezevic, Bojana, Miglioretti, Massimo, Munir, Fehmidah, Popa, Adela Elena, Sedlakova, Maria, Torp, Steffen, Yagil, Dana, Tamminga, Sietske, de Boer, Angela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31758518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00829-y
_version_ 1783526255356805120
author de Rijk, Angelique
Amir, Ziv
Cohen, Miri
Furlan, Tomislav
Godderis, Lode
Knezevic, Bojana
Miglioretti, Massimo
Munir, Fehmidah
Popa, Adela Elena
Sedlakova, Maria
Torp, Steffen
Yagil, Dana
Tamminga, Sietske
de Boer, Angela
author_facet de Rijk, Angelique
Amir, Ziv
Cohen, Miri
Furlan, Tomislav
Godderis, Lode
Knezevic, Bojana
Miglioretti, Massimo
Munir, Fehmidah
Popa, Adela Elena
Sedlakova, Maria
Torp, Steffen
Yagil, Dana
Tamminga, Sietske
de Boer, Angela
author_sort de Rijk, Angelique
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study explored employer’s perspectives on (1) their experience of good practice related to workers diagnosed with cancer and their return to work (RTW), and (2) their perceived needs necessary to achieve good practice as reported by employers from nine separate countries. METHODS: Twenty-five semi-structured interviews were held in eight European countries and Israel with two to three employers typically including HR managers or line managers from both profit and non-profit organisations of different sizes and sectors. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A grounded theory/thematic analysis approach was completed. RESULTS: Employers’ experience with RTW assistance for workers with cancer appears to be a dynamic process. Results indicate that good practice includes six phases: (1) reacting to disclosure, (2) collecting information, (3) decision-making related to initial actions, (4) remaining in touch, (5) decision-making on RTW, and (6) follow-up. The exact details of the process are shaped by country, employer type, and worker characteristics; however, there was consistency related to the need for (1) structured procedures, (2) collaboration, (3) communication skills training, (4) information on cancer, and (5) financial resources for realizing RTW support measures. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding variations at country, employer, and worker levels, the employers from all nine countries reported that good practice regarding RTW assistance in workers with a history of cancer consists of the six phases above. Employers indicate that they would benefit from shared collaboration and resources that support good practice for this human resource matter. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Further research and development based on the six phases of employer support as a framework for a tool or strategy to support workers with a history of cancer across countries and organisations is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7182537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71825372020-04-29 The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health de Rijk, Angelique Amir, Ziv Cohen, Miri Furlan, Tomislav Godderis, Lode Knezevic, Bojana Miglioretti, Massimo Munir, Fehmidah Popa, Adela Elena Sedlakova, Maria Torp, Steffen Yagil, Dana Tamminga, Sietske de Boer, Angela J Cancer Surviv Article PURPOSE: This study explored employer’s perspectives on (1) their experience of good practice related to workers diagnosed with cancer and their return to work (RTW), and (2) their perceived needs necessary to achieve good practice as reported by employers from nine separate countries. METHODS: Twenty-five semi-structured interviews were held in eight European countries and Israel with two to three employers typically including HR managers or line managers from both profit and non-profit organisations of different sizes and sectors. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A grounded theory/thematic analysis approach was completed. RESULTS: Employers’ experience with RTW assistance for workers with cancer appears to be a dynamic process. Results indicate that good practice includes six phases: (1) reacting to disclosure, (2) collecting information, (3) decision-making related to initial actions, (4) remaining in touch, (5) decision-making on RTW, and (6) follow-up. The exact details of the process are shaped by country, employer type, and worker characteristics; however, there was consistency related to the need for (1) structured procedures, (2) collaboration, (3) communication skills training, (4) information on cancer, and (5) financial resources for realizing RTW support measures. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding variations at country, employer, and worker levels, the employers from all nine countries reported that good practice regarding RTW assistance in workers with a history of cancer consists of the six phases above. Employers indicate that they would benefit from shared collaboration and resources that support good practice for this human resource matter. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Further research and development based on the six phases of employer support as a framework for a tool or strategy to support workers with a history of cancer across countries and organisations is warranted. Springer US 2019-11-22 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7182537/ /pubmed/31758518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00829-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
de Rijk, Angelique
Amir, Ziv
Cohen, Miri
Furlan, Tomislav
Godderis, Lode
Knezevic, Bojana
Miglioretti, Massimo
Munir, Fehmidah
Popa, Adela Elena
Sedlakova, Maria
Torp, Steffen
Yagil, Dana
Tamminga, Sietske
de Boer, Angela
The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health
title The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health
title_full The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health
title_fullStr The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health
title_full_unstemmed The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health
title_short The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health
title_sort challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31758518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00829-y
work_keys_str_mv AT derijkangelique thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT amirziv thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT cohenmiri thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT furlantomislav thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT godderislode thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT knezevicbojana thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT migliorettimassimo thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT munirfehmidah thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT popaadelaelena thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT sedlakovamaria thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT torpsteffen thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT yagildana thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT tammingasietske thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT deboerangela thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT derijkangelique challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT amirziv challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT cohenmiri challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT furlantomislav challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT godderislode challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT knezevicbojana challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT migliorettimassimo challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT munirfehmidah challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT popaadelaelena challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT sedlakovamaria challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT torpsteffen challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT yagildana challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT tammingasietske challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth
AT deboerangela challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth