Cargando…
The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health
PURPOSE: This study explored employer’s perspectives on (1) their experience of good practice related to workers diagnosed with cancer and their return to work (RTW), and (2) their perceived needs necessary to achieve good practice as reported by employers from nine separate countries. METHODS: Twen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31758518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00829-y |
_version_ | 1783526255356805120 |
---|---|
author | de Rijk, Angelique Amir, Ziv Cohen, Miri Furlan, Tomislav Godderis, Lode Knezevic, Bojana Miglioretti, Massimo Munir, Fehmidah Popa, Adela Elena Sedlakova, Maria Torp, Steffen Yagil, Dana Tamminga, Sietske de Boer, Angela |
author_facet | de Rijk, Angelique Amir, Ziv Cohen, Miri Furlan, Tomislav Godderis, Lode Knezevic, Bojana Miglioretti, Massimo Munir, Fehmidah Popa, Adela Elena Sedlakova, Maria Torp, Steffen Yagil, Dana Tamminga, Sietske de Boer, Angela |
author_sort | de Rijk, Angelique |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study explored employer’s perspectives on (1) their experience of good practice related to workers diagnosed with cancer and their return to work (RTW), and (2) their perceived needs necessary to achieve good practice as reported by employers from nine separate countries. METHODS: Twenty-five semi-structured interviews were held in eight European countries and Israel with two to three employers typically including HR managers or line managers from both profit and non-profit organisations of different sizes and sectors. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A grounded theory/thematic analysis approach was completed. RESULTS: Employers’ experience with RTW assistance for workers with cancer appears to be a dynamic process. Results indicate that good practice includes six phases: (1) reacting to disclosure, (2) collecting information, (3) decision-making related to initial actions, (4) remaining in touch, (5) decision-making on RTW, and (6) follow-up. The exact details of the process are shaped by country, employer type, and worker characteristics; however, there was consistency related to the need for (1) structured procedures, (2) collaboration, (3) communication skills training, (4) information on cancer, and (5) financial resources for realizing RTW support measures. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding variations at country, employer, and worker levels, the employers from all nine countries reported that good practice regarding RTW assistance in workers with a history of cancer consists of the six phases above. Employers indicate that they would benefit from shared collaboration and resources that support good practice for this human resource matter. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Further research and development based on the six phases of employer support as a framework for a tool or strategy to support workers with a history of cancer across countries and organisations is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7182537 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71825372020-04-29 The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health de Rijk, Angelique Amir, Ziv Cohen, Miri Furlan, Tomislav Godderis, Lode Knezevic, Bojana Miglioretti, Massimo Munir, Fehmidah Popa, Adela Elena Sedlakova, Maria Torp, Steffen Yagil, Dana Tamminga, Sietske de Boer, Angela J Cancer Surviv Article PURPOSE: This study explored employer’s perspectives on (1) their experience of good practice related to workers diagnosed with cancer and their return to work (RTW), and (2) their perceived needs necessary to achieve good practice as reported by employers from nine separate countries. METHODS: Twenty-five semi-structured interviews were held in eight European countries and Israel with two to three employers typically including HR managers or line managers from both profit and non-profit organisations of different sizes and sectors. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A grounded theory/thematic analysis approach was completed. RESULTS: Employers’ experience with RTW assistance for workers with cancer appears to be a dynamic process. Results indicate that good practice includes six phases: (1) reacting to disclosure, (2) collecting information, (3) decision-making related to initial actions, (4) remaining in touch, (5) decision-making on RTW, and (6) follow-up. The exact details of the process are shaped by country, employer type, and worker characteristics; however, there was consistency related to the need for (1) structured procedures, (2) collaboration, (3) communication skills training, (4) information on cancer, and (5) financial resources for realizing RTW support measures. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding variations at country, employer, and worker levels, the employers from all nine countries reported that good practice regarding RTW assistance in workers with a history of cancer consists of the six phases above. Employers indicate that they would benefit from shared collaboration and resources that support good practice for this human resource matter. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Further research and development based on the six phases of employer support as a framework for a tool or strategy to support workers with a history of cancer across countries and organisations is warranted. Springer US 2019-11-22 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7182537/ /pubmed/31758518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00829-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article de Rijk, Angelique Amir, Ziv Cohen, Miri Furlan, Tomislav Godderis, Lode Knezevic, Bojana Miglioretti, Massimo Munir, Fehmidah Popa, Adela Elena Sedlakova, Maria Torp, Steffen Yagil, Dana Tamminga, Sietske de Boer, Angela The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health |
title | The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health |
title_full | The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health |
title_fullStr | The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health |
title_full_unstemmed | The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health |
title_short | The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health |
title_sort | challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31758518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00829-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT derijkangelique thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT amirziv thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT cohenmiri thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT furlantomislav thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT godderislode thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT knezevicbojana thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT migliorettimassimo thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT munirfehmidah thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT popaadelaelena thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT sedlakovamaria thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT torpsteffen thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT yagildana thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT tammingasietske thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT deboerangela thechallengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT derijkangelique challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT amirziv challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT cohenmiri challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT furlantomislav challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT godderislode challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT knezevicbojana challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT migliorettimassimo challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT munirfehmidah challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT popaadelaelena challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT sedlakovamaria challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT torpsteffen challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT yagildana challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT tammingasietske challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth AT deboerangela challengeofreturntoworkinworkerswithcanceremployerprioritiesdespitevariationinsocialpoliciesrelatedtoworkandhealth |