Cargando…

Detection of anti‐NS1 antibodies after pandemic influenza exposure: Evaluation of a serological method for distinguishing H1N1pdm09 infected from vaccinated cases

BACKGROUND: Reliable exposure information is crucial for assessing health outcomes of influenza infection and vaccination. Current serological methods are unable to distinguish between anti‐hemagglutinin (HA) antibodies induced by infection or vaccination. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore an alternat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robertson, Anna Hayman, Mahic, Milada, Savic, Miloje, Tunheim, Gro, Hungnes, Olav, Trogstad, Lill, Lipkin, Walter Ian, Mjaaland, Siri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31955522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12712
_version_ 1783526261674475520
author Robertson, Anna Hayman
Mahic, Milada
Savic, Miloje
Tunheim, Gro
Hungnes, Olav
Trogstad, Lill
Lipkin, Walter Ian
Mjaaland, Siri
author_facet Robertson, Anna Hayman
Mahic, Milada
Savic, Miloje
Tunheim, Gro
Hungnes, Olav
Trogstad, Lill
Lipkin, Walter Ian
Mjaaland, Siri
author_sort Robertson, Anna Hayman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reliable exposure information is crucial for assessing health outcomes of influenza infection and vaccination. Current serological methods are unable to distinguish between anti‐hemagglutinin (HA) antibodies induced by infection or vaccination. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore an alternative method for differentiating influenza infection and vaccination. METHODS: Sera from animals inoculated with influenza viruses or purified H1N1pdm09 HA were obtained. Human samples were selected from a pregnancy cohort established during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Unvaccinated, laboratory‐confirmed cases (N = 18), vaccinated cases without influenza‐like‐illness (N = 18) and uninfected, unvaccinated controls (N = 18) were identified based on exposure data from questionnaires, national registries and maternal hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titres at delivery. Animal and human samples were tested for antibodies against the non‐structural protein 1 (NS1) and HA from H1N1pdm09, using a Luciferase Immunoprecipitation System (LIPS). RESULTS: Anti‐NS1 H1N1pdm09 antibodies were detected in sera from experimentally infected, but not from vaccinated, animals. Anti‐HA H1N1pdm09 antibodies were detectable after either of these exposures. In human samples, 28% of individuals with laboratory‐confirmed influenza were seropositive for H1N1pdm09 NS1, whereas vaccinated cases and controls were seronegative. There was a trend for H1N1pdm09 NS1 seropositive cases reporting more severe and longer duration of symptomatic illness than seronegative cases. Anti‐HA H1N1pdm09 antibodies were detected in all cases and in 61% of controls. CONCLUSIONS: The LIPS method could differentiate between sera from experimentally infected and vaccinated animals. However, in human samples obtained more than 6 months after the pandemic, LIPS was specific, but not sufficiently sensitive for ascertaining cases by exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7182603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71826032020-05-01 Detection of anti‐NS1 antibodies after pandemic influenza exposure: Evaluation of a serological method for distinguishing H1N1pdm09 infected from vaccinated cases Robertson, Anna Hayman Mahic, Milada Savic, Miloje Tunheim, Gro Hungnes, Olav Trogstad, Lill Lipkin, Walter Ian Mjaaland, Siri Influenza Other Respir Viruses Original Articles BACKGROUND: Reliable exposure information is crucial for assessing health outcomes of influenza infection and vaccination. Current serological methods are unable to distinguish between anti‐hemagglutinin (HA) antibodies induced by infection or vaccination. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore an alternative method for differentiating influenza infection and vaccination. METHODS: Sera from animals inoculated with influenza viruses or purified H1N1pdm09 HA were obtained. Human samples were selected from a pregnancy cohort established during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Unvaccinated, laboratory‐confirmed cases (N = 18), vaccinated cases without influenza‐like‐illness (N = 18) and uninfected, unvaccinated controls (N = 18) were identified based on exposure data from questionnaires, national registries and maternal hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titres at delivery. Animal and human samples were tested for antibodies against the non‐structural protein 1 (NS1) and HA from H1N1pdm09, using a Luciferase Immunoprecipitation System (LIPS). RESULTS: Anti‐NS1 H1N1pdm09 antibodies were detected in sera from experimentally infected, but not from vaccinated, animals. Anti‐HA H1N1pdm09 antibodies were detectable after either of these exposures. In human samples, 28% of individuals with laboratory‐confirmed influenza were seropositive for H1N1pdm09 NS1, whereas vaccinated cases and controls were seronegative. There was a trend for H1N1pdm09 NS1 seropositive cases reporting more severe and longer duration of symptomatic illness than seronegative cases. Anti‐HA H1N1pdm09 antibodies were detected in all cases and in 61% of controls. CONCLUSIONS: The LIPS method could differentiate between sera from experimentally infected and vaccinated animals. However, in human samples obtained more than 6 months after the pandemic, LIPS was specific, but not sufficiently sensitive for ascertaining cases by exposure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-19 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7182603/ /pubmed/31955522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12712 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Robertson, Anna Hayman
Mahic, Milada
Savic, Miloje
Tunheim, Gro
Hungnes, Olav
Trogstad, Lill
Lipkin, Walter Ian
Mjaaland, Siri
Detection of anti‐NS1 antibodies after pandemic influenza exposure: Evaluation of a serological method for distinguishing H1N1pdm09 infected from vaccinated cases
title Detection of anti‐NS1 antibodies after pandemic influenza exposure: Evaluation of a serological method for distinguishing H1N1pdm09 infected from vaccinated cases
title_full Detection of anti‐NS1 antibodies after pandemic influenza exposure: Evaluation of a serological method for distinguishing H1N1pdm09 infected from vaccinated cases
title_fullStr Detection of anti‐NS1 antibodies after pandemic influenza exposure: Evaluation of a serological method for distinguishing H1N1pdm09 infected from vaccinated cases
title_full_unstemmed Detection of anti‐NS1 antibodies after pandemic influenza exposure: Evaluation of a serological method for distinguishing H1N1pdm09 infected from vaccinated cases
title_short Detection of anti‐NS1 antibodies after pandemic influenza exposure: Evaluation of a serological method for distinguishing H1N1pdm09 infected from vaccinated cases
title_sort detection of anti‐ns1 antibodies after pandemic influenza exposure: evaluation of a serological method for distinguishing h1n1pdm09 infected from vaccinated cases
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31955522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12712
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsonannahayman detectionofantins1antibodiesafterpandemicinfluenzaexposureevaluationofaserologicalmethodfordistinguishingh1n1pdm09infectedfromvaccinatedcases
AT mahicmilada detectionofantins1antibodiesafterpandemicinfluenzaexposureevaluationofaserologicalmethodfordistinguishingh1n1pdm09infectedfromvaccinatedcases
AT savicmiloje detectionofantins1antibodiesafterpandemicinfluenzaexposureevaluationofaserologicalmethodfordistinguishingh1n1pdm09infectedfromvaccinatedcases
AT tunheimgro detectionofantins1antibodiesafterpandemicinfluenzaexposureevaluationofaserologicalmethodfordistinguishingh1n1pdm09infectedfromvaccinatedcases
AT hungnesolav detectionofantins1antibodiesafterpandemicinfluenzaexposureevaluationofaserologicalmethodfordistinguishingh1n1pdm09infectedfromvaccinatedcases
AT trogstadlill detectionofantins1antibodiesafterpandemicinfluenzaexposureevaluationofaserologicalmethodfordistinguishingh1n1pdm09infectedfromvaccinatedcases
AT lipkinwalterian detectionofantins1antibodiesafterpandemicinfluenzaexposureevaluationofaserologicalmethodfordistinguishingh1n1pdm09infectedfromvaccinatedcases
AT mjaalandsiri detectionofantins1antibodiesafterpandemicinfluenzaexposureevaluationofaserologicalmethodfordistinguishingh1n1pdm09infectedfromvaccinatedcases