Cargando…

Detoxifying deoxynivalenol (DON)-contaminated feedstuff: consequences of sodium sulphite (SoS) treatment on performance and blood parameters in fattening pigs

A 10-week feeding experiment was carried out examining the effects of deoxynivalenol (DON)-contaminated maize treated with different sodium sulphite (SoS) concentrations on performance, health and DON-plasma concentrations in fattening pigs. Two maize batches were used: background-contaminated (CON,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bahrenthien, L., Kluess, J., Berk, A., Kersten, S., Saltzmann, J., Hüther, L., Schatzmayr, D., Schwartz-Zimmermann, H. E., Zeyner, A., Dänicke, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31960350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12550-019-00385-5
_version_ 1783526265233342464
author Bahrenthien, L.
Kluess, J.
Berk, A.
Kersten, S.
Saltzmann, J.
Hüther, L.
Schatzmayr, D.
Schwartz-Zimmermann, H. E.
Zeyner, A.
Dänicke, S.
author_facet Bahrenthien, L.
Kluess, J.
Berk, A.
Kersten, S.
Saltzmann, J.
Hüther, L.
Schatzmayr, D.
Schwartz-Zimmermann, H. E.
Zeyner, A.
Dänicke, S.
author_sort Bahrenthien, L.
collection PubMed
description A 10-week feeding experiment was carried out examining the effects of deoxynivalenol (DON)-contaminated maize treated with different sodium sulphite (SoS) concentrations on performance, health and DON-plasma concentrations in fattening pigs. Two maize batches were used: background-contaminated (CON, 0.73 mg/kg maize) and Fusarium-toxin contaminated (DON, 44.45 mg/kg maize) maize. Both were wet preserved at 20% moisture content, with one of three (0.0, 2.5, 5.0 g/kg maize) sodium sulphite concentrations and propionic acid (15%). Each maize batch was then mixed into a barley-wheat-based diet at a proportion of 10%, resulting in the following 6 feeding groups: CON− (CON + 0.0 g SoS/kg maize), CON2.5 (CON + 2.5 g SoS/kg maize), CON5.0 (CON + 5.0 g SoS/kg maize), DON- (DON + 0.0 g SoS/kg maize), DON2.5 (DON + 2.5 g SoS/kg maize) and DON5.0 (DON + 5.0 g SoS/kg maize). Dietary DON concentration was reduced by ~ 36% in group DON2.5 and ~ 63% in group DON5.0. There was no impact on ZEN concentration in the diets due to SoS treatment. Pigs receiving diet DON- showed markedly lower feed intake (FI) compared to those fed the control diets. With SoS-treatment of maize, FI of pigs fed the DON diet (DON5.0: 3.35 kg/d) were comparable to that control (CON−: 3.30 kg/day), and these effects were also reflected in live weight gain. There were some effects of SoS, DON or their interaction on serum urea, cholesterol and albumin, but always within the physiological range and thus likely negligible. SoS wet preservation of Fusarium-toxin contaminated maize successfully detoxified DON to its innocuous sulfonates, thus restoring impaired performance in fatteners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7182618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71826182020-04-29 Detoxifying deoxynivalenol (DON)-contaminated feedstuff: consequences of sodium sulphite (SoS) treatment on performance and blood parameters in fattening pigs Bahrenthien, L. Kluess, J. Berk, A. Kersten, S. Saltzmann, J. Hüther, L. Schatzmayr, D. Schwartz-Zimmermann, H. E. Zeyner, A. Dänicke, S. Mycotoxin Res Original Article A 10-week feeding experiment was carried out examining the effects of deoxynivalenol (DON)-contaminated maize treated with different sodium sulphite (SoS) concentrations on performance, health and DON-plasma concentrations in fattening pigs. Two maize batches were used: background-contaminated (CON, 0.73 mg/kg maize) and Fusarium-toxin contaminated (DON, 44.45 mg/kg maize) maize. Both were wet preserved at 20% moisture content, with one of three (0.0, 2.5, 5.0 g/kg maize) sodium sulphite concentrations and propionic acid (15%). Each maize batch was then mixed into a barley-wheat-based diet at a proportion of 10%, resulting in the following 6 feeding groups: CON− (CON + 0.0 g SoS/kg maize), CON2.5 (CON + 2.5 g SoS/kg maize), CON5.0 (CON + 5.0 g SoS/kg maize), DON- (DON + 0.0 g SoS/kg maize), DON2.5 (DON + 2.5 g SoS/kg maize) and DON5.0 (DON + 5.0 g SoS/kg maize). Dietary DON concentration was reduced by ~ 36% in group DON2.5 and ~ 63% in group DON5.0. There was no impact on ZEN concentration in the diets due to SoS treatment. Pigs receiving diet DON- showed markedly lower feed intake (FI) compared to those fed the control diets. With SoS-treatment of maize, FI of pigs fed the DON diet (DON5.0: 3.35 kg/d) were comparable to that control (CON−: 3.30 kg/day), and these effects were also reflected in live weight gain. There were some effects of SoS, DON or their interaction on serum urea, cholesterol and albumin, but always within the physiological range and thus likely negligible. SoS wet preservation of Fusarium-toxin contaminated maize successfully detoxified DON to its innocuous sulfonates, thus restoring impaired performance in fatteners. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-01-20 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7182618/ /pubmed/31960350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12550-019-00385-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bahrenthien, L.
Kluess, J.
Berk, A.
Kersten, S.
Saltzmann, J.
Hüther, L.
Schatzmayr, D.
Schwartz-Zimmermann, H. E.
Zeyner, A.
Dänicke, S.
Detoxifying deoxynivalenol (DON)-contaminated feedstuff: consequences of sodium sulphite (SoS) treatment on performance and blood parameters in fattening pigs
title Detoxifying deoxynivalenol (DON)-contaminated feedstuff: consequences of sodium sulphite (SoS) treatment on performance and blood parameters in fattening pigs
title_full Detoxifying deoxynivalenol (DON)-contaminated feedstuff: consequences of sodium sulphite (SoS) treatment on performance and blood parameters in fattening pigs
title_fullStr Detoxifying deoxynivalenol (DON)-contaminated feedstuff: consequences of sodium sulphite (SoS) treatment on performance and blood parameters in fattening pigs
title_full_unstemmed Detoxifying deoxynivalenol (DON)-contaminated feedstuff: consequences of sodium sulphite (SoS) treatment on performance and blood parameters in fattening pigs
title_short Detoxifying deoxynivalenol (DON)-contaminated feedstuff: consequences of sodium sulphite (SoS) treatment on performance and blood parameters in fattening pigs
title_sort detoxifying deoxynivalenol (don)-contaminated feedstuff: consequences of sodium sulphite (sos) treatment on performance and blood parameters in fattening pigs
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31960350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12550-019-00385-5
work_keys_str_mv AT bahrenthienl detoxifyingdeoxynivalenoldoncontaminatedfeedstuffconsequencesofsodiumsulphitesostreatmentonperformanceandbloodparametersinfatteningpigs
AT kluessj detoxifyingdeoxynivalenoldoncontaminatedfeedstuffconsequencesofsodiumsulphitesostreatmentonperformanceandbloodparametersinfatteningpigs
AT berka detoxifyingdeoxynivalenoldoncontaminatedfeedstuffconsequencesofsodiumsulphitesostreatmentonperformanceandbloodparametersinfatteningpigs
AT kerstens detoxifyingdeoxynivalenoldoncontaminatedfeedstuffconsequencesofsodiumsulphitesostreatmentonperformanceandbloodparametersinfatteningpigs
AT saltzmannj detoxifyingdeoxynivalenoldoncontaminatedfeedstuffconsequencesofsodiumsulphitesostreatmentonperformanceandbloodparametersinfatteningpigs
AT hutherl detoxifyingdeoxynivalenoldoncontaminatedfeedstuffconsequencesofsodiumsulphitesostreatmentonperformanceandbloodparametersinfatteningpigs
AT schatzmayrd detoxifyingdeoxynivalenoldoncontaminatedfeedstuffconsequencesofsodiumsulphitesostreatmentonperformanceandbloodparametersinfatteningpigs
AT schwartzzimmermannhe detoxifyingdeoxynivalenoldoncontaminatedfeedstuffconsequencesofsodiumsulphitesostreatmentonperformanceandbloodparametersinfatteningpigs
AT zeynera detoxifyingdeoxynivalenoldoncontaminatedfeedstuffconsequencesofsodiumsulphitesostreatmentonperformanceandbloodparametersinfatteningpigs
AT danickes detoxifyingdeoxynivalenoldoncontaminatedfeedstuffconsequencesofsodiumsulphitesostreatmentonperformanceandbloodparametersinfatteningpigs