Cargando…

Prevention of Encrustation on Ureteral Stents: Which Surface Parameters Provide Guidance for the Development of Novel Stent Materials?

Encrustations of ureteral stents are one of the biggest problems with urological implants. Crystalline biofilms can occur alone or in combination with bacterial biofilms. To identify which surface parameters provide guidance for the development of novel stent materials, we used an in vitro encrustat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rebl, Henrike, Renner, Jürgen, Kram, Wolfgang, Springer, Armin, Fritsch, Nele, Hansmann, Harald, Hakenberg, Oliver W., Nebe, J. Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32138300
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12030558
_version_ 1783526337401585664
author Rebl, Henrike
Renner, Jürgen
Kram, Wolfgang
Springer, Armin
Fritsch, Nele
Hansmann, Harald
Hakenberg, Oliver W.
Nebe, J. Barbara
author_facet Rebl, Henrike
Renner, Jürgen
Kram, Wolfgang
Springer, Armin
Fritsch, Nele
Hansmann, Harald
Hakenberg, Oliver W.
Nebe, J. Barbara
author_sort Rebl, Henrike
collection PubMed
description Encrustations of ureteral stents are one of the biggest problems with urological implants. Crystalline biofilms can occur alone or in combination with bacterial biofilms. To identify which surface parameters provide guidance for the development of novel stent materials, we used an in vitro encrustation system. Synthetic urine with increasing pH to simulate an infection situation was pumped over the polymer samples with adjusted flow rates at 37 °C to mimic the native body urine flow. Chemical surface features (contact angle, surface charge), as well as encrustations were characterized. The encrustations on the materials were analyzed quantitatively (dry mass) and qualitatively using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The aim of this comparative study was to identify crucial surface parameters that might predict the quantity and type of mineral deposits in vitro and provide guidance for the development and screening of new polymer-based biomaterials for ureteral stent design. For the first time, we could identify that, within the range of our polymers, those materials with a slight hydrophilicity and a strong negative zeta potential (around −60 mV) were most favorable for use as ureteral stent materials, as the deposition of crystalline biofilms was minimized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7182952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71829522020-05-01 Prevention of Encrustation on Ureteral Stents: Which Surface Parameters Provide Guidance for the Development of Novel Stent Materials? Rebl, Henrike Renner, Jürgen Kram, Wolfgang Springer, Armin Fritsch, Nele Hansmann, Harald Hakenberg, Oliver W. Nebe, J. Barbara Polymers (Basel) Article Encrustations of ureteral stents are one of the biggest problems with urological implants. Crystalline biofilms can occur alone or in combination with bacterial biofilms. To identify which surface parameters provide guidance for the development of novel stent materials, we used an in vitro encrustation system. Synthetic urine with increasing pH to simulate an infection situation was pumped over the polymer samples with adjusted flow rates at 37 °C to mimic the native body urine flow. Chemical surface features (contact angle, surface charge), as well as encrustations were characterized. The encrustations on the materials were analyzed quantitatively (dry mass) and qualitatively using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The aim of this comparative study was to identify crucial surface parameters that might predict the quantity and type of mineral deposits in vitro and provide guidance for the development and screening of new polymer-based biomaterials for ureteral stent design. For the first time, we could identify that, within the range of our polymers, those materials with a slight hydrophilicity and a strong negative zeta potential (around −60 mV) were most favorable for use as ureteral stent materials, as the deposition of crystalline biofilms was minimized. MDPI 2020-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7182952/ /pubmed/32138300 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12030558 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rebl, Henrike
Renner, Jürgen
Kram, Wolfgang
Springer, Armin
Fritsch, Nele
Hansmann, Harald
Hakenberg, Oliver W.
Nebe, J. Barbara
Prevention of Encrustation on Ureteral Stents: Which Surface Parameters Provide Guidance for the Development of Novel Stent Materials?
title Prevention of Encrustation on Ureteral Stents: Which Surface Parameters Provide Guidance for the Development of Novel Stent Materials?
title_full Prevention of Encrustation on Ureteral Stents: Which Surface Parameters Provide Guidance for the Development of Novel Stent Materials?
title_fullStr Prevention of Encrustation on Ureteral Stents: Which Surface Parameters Provide Guidance for the Development of Novel Stent Materials?
title_full_unstemmed Prevention of Encrustation on Ureteral Stents: Which Surface Parameters Provide Guidance for the Development of Novel Stent Materials?
title_short Prevention of Encrustation on Ureteral Stents: Which Surface Parameters Provide Guidance for the Development of Novel Stent Materials?
title_sort prevention of encrustation on ureteral stents: which surface parameters provide guidance for the development of novel stent materials?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32138300
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12030558
work_keys_str_mv AT reblhenrike preventionofencrustationonureteralstentswhichsurfaceparametersprovideguidanceforthedevelopmentofnovelstentmaterials
AT rennerjurgen preventionofencrustationonureteralstentswhichsurfaceparametersprovideguidanceforthedevelopmentofnovelstentmaterials
AT kramwolfgang preventionofencrustationonureteralstentswhichsurfaceparametersprovideguidanceforthedevelopmentofnovelstentmaterials
AT springerarmin preventionofencrustationonureteralstentswhichsurfaceparametersprovideguidanceforthedevelopmentofnovelstentmaterials
AT fritschnele preventionofencrustationonureteralstentswhichsurfaceparametersprovideguidanceforthedevelopmentofnovelstentmaterials
AT hansmannharald preventionofencrustationonureteralstentswhichsurfaceparametersprovideguidanceforthedevelopmentofnovelstentmaterials
AT hakenbergoliverw preventionofencrustationonureteralstentswhichsurfaceparametersprovideguidanceforthedevelopmentofnovelstentmaterials
AT nebejbarbara preventionofencrustationonureteralstentswhichsurfaceparametersprovideguidanceforthedevelopmentofnovelstentmaterials