Cargando…

People–centred care versus clinic–based DOT for continuation phase TB treatment in Armenia: a cluster randomized trial

BACKGROUND: WHO’s directly observed therapy (DOT) strategy for tuberculosis (TB) treatment depends upon a well–organized healthcare system. This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of self-administered drug intake supported by a family member versus in-clinic DOT. METHODS: This open–label, na...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khachadourian, Vahe, Truzyan, Nune, Harutyunyan, Arusyak, Petrosyan, Varduhi, Davtyan, Hayk, Davtyan, Karapet, van den Boom, Martin, Thompson, Michael E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7183136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32334553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-1141-y
_version_ 1783526373463162880
author Khachadourian, Vahe
Truzyan, Nune
Harutyunyan, Arusyak
Petrosyan, Varduhi
Davtyan, Hayk
Davtyan, Karapet
van den Boom, Martin
Thompson, Michael E.
author_facet Khachadourian, Vahe
Truzyan, Nune
Harutyunyan, Arusyak
Petrosyan, Varduhi
Davtyan, Hayk
Davtyan, Karapet
van den Boom, Martin
Thompson, Michael E.
author_sort Khachadourian, Vahe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: WHO’s directly observed therapy (DOT) strategy for tuberculosis (TB) treatment depends upon a well–organized healthcare system. This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of self-administered drug intake supported by a family member versus in-clinic DOT. METHODS: This open–label, nationally-representative stratified cluster randomized controlled non–inferiority trial with two parallel equal arms involved drug–susceptible pulmonary TB patients in the continuation treatment phase. We randomly assigned outpatient–TB–centres (52 clusters) to intervention and control arms. The intervention included an educational/counseling session to enhance treatment adherence; weekly visits to outpatient–TB–centres to receive medication, and daily SMS medication reminders and phone calls to track adherence and record side effects. Controls followed clinical DOT at Outpatient–TB–centres. Both groups participated in baseline and 4–5 months follow–up surveys. The trial’s non–inferiority comparisons include: treatment success as the clinical (primary) outcome and medication adherence (self–reported), knowledge, depressive symptoms, stigma, quality of life, and social support as non–clinical (secondary) outcomes. RESULTS: Per–protocol analysis showed that the intervention (n = 187) and control (n = 198) arms achieved successful treatment outcome of 92.0 and 92.9%, respectively, indicating that the treatment success in the intervention group was non–inferior to DOT. Knowledge, depression, stigma, quality of life, and social support also showed non–inferiority, demonstrating substantial improvement over time for knowledge (change in the intervention = 1.05: 95%CL (0.49, 1.60); change in the control = 1.09: 95%CL (0.56, 1.64)), depression score (change in the intervention = − 3.56: 95%CL (− 4.99, − 2.13); change in the control = − 1.88: 95% CL (− 3.26, − 0.49)) and quality of life (change in the intervention = 5.01: 95%CL (− 0.64, 10.66); change in the control = 7.29: 95%CL (1.77, 12.81)). The intervention resulted in improved treatment adherence. CONCLUSIONS: This socially empowering alternative strategy might be a preferable alternative to DOT available to patients in Armenia and in other countries. Further research evaluating cost effectiveness of the intervention and generalizability of the results is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02082340, March 10, 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7183136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71831362020-04-28 People–centred care versus clinic–based DOT for continuation phase TB treatment in Armenia: a cluster randomized trial Khachadourian, Vahe Truzyan, Nune Harutyunyan, Arusyak Petrosyan, Varduhi Davtyan, Hayk Davtyan, Karapet van den Boom, Martin Thompson, Michael E. BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: WHO’s directly observed therapy (DOT) strategy for tuberculosis (TB) treatment depends upon a well–organized healthcare system. This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of self-administered drug intake supported by a family member versus in-clinic DOT. METHODS: This open–label, nationally-representative stratified cluster randomized controlled non–inferiority trial with two parallel equal arms involved drug–susceptible pulmonary TB patients in the continuation treatment phase. We randomly assigned outpatient–TB–centres (52 clusters) to intervention and control arms. The intervention included an educational/counseling session to enhance treatment adherence; weekly visits to outpatient–TB–centres to receive medication, and daily SMS medication reminders and phone calls to track adherence and record side effects. Controls followed clinical DOT at Outpatient–TB–centres. Both groups participated in baseline and 4–5 months follow–up surveys. The trial’s non–inferiority comparisons include: treatment success as the clinical (primary) outcome and medication adherence (self–reported), knowledge, depressive symptoms, stigma, quality of life, and social support as non–clinical (secondary) outcomes. RESULTS: Per–protocol analysis showed that the intervention (n = 187) and control (n = 198) arms achieved successful treatment outcome of 92.0 and 92.9%, respectively, indicating that the treatment success in the intervention group was non–inferior to DOT. Knowledge, depression, stigma, quality of life, and social support also showed non–inferiority, demonstrating substantial improvement over time for knowledge (change in the intervention = 1.05: 95%CL (0.49, 1.60); change in the control = 1.09: 95%CL (0.56, 1.64)), depression score (change in the intervention = − 3.56: 95%CL (− 4.99, − 2.13); change in the control = − 1.88: 95% CL (− 3.26, − 0.49)) and quality of life (change in the intervention = 5.01: 95%CL (− 0.64, 10.66); change in the control = 7.29: 95%CL (1.77, 12.81)). The intervention resulted in improved treatment adherence. CONCLUSIONS: This socially empowering alternative strategy might be a preferable alternative to DOT available to patients in Armenia and in other countries. Further research evaluating cost effectiveness of the intervention and generalizability of the results is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02082340, March 10, 2014. BioMed Central 2020-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7183136/ /pubmed/32334553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-1141-y Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khachadourian, Vahe
Truzyan, Nune
Harutyunyan, Arusyak
Petrosyan, Varduhi
Davtyan, Hayk
Davtyan, Karapet
van den Boom, Martin
Thompson, Michael E.
People–centred care versus clinic–based DOT for continuation phase TB treatment in Armenia: a cluster randomized trial
title People–centred care versus clinic–based DOT for continuation phase TB treatment in Armenia: a cluster randomized trial
title_full People–centred care versus clinic–based DOT for continuation phase TB treatment in Armenia: a cluster randomized trial
title_fullStr People–centred care versus clinic–based DOT for continuation phase TB treatment in Armenia: a cluster randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed People–centred care versus clinic–based DOT for continuation phase TB treatment in Armenia: a cluster randomized trial
title_short People–centred care versus clinic–based DOT for continuation phase TB treatment in Armenia: a cluster randomized trial
title_sort people–centred care versus clinic–based dot for continuation phase tb treatment in armenia: a cluster randomized trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7183136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32334553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-1141-y
work_keys_str_mv AT khachadourianvahe peoplecentredcareversusclinicbaseddotforcontinuationphasetbtreatmentinarmeniaaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT truzyannune peoplecentredcareversusclinicbaseddotforcontinuationphasetbtreatmentinarmeniaaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT harutyunyanarusyak peoplecentredcareversusclinicbaseddotforcontinuationphasetbtreatmentinarmeniaaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT petrosyanvarduhi peoplecentredcareversusclinicbaseddotforcontinuationphasetbtreatmentinarmeniaaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT davtyanhayk peoplecentredcareversusclinicbaseddotforcontinuationphasetbtreatmentinarmeniaaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT davtyankarapet peoplecentredcareversusclinicbaseddotforcontinuationphasetbtreatmentinarmeniaaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT vandenboommartin peoplecentredcareversusclinicbaseddotforcontinuationphasetbtreatmentinarmeniaaclusterrandomizedtrial
AT thompsonmichaele peoplecentredcareversusclinicbaseddotforcontinuationphasetbtreatmentinarmeniaaclusterrandomizedtrial