Cargando…
People–centred care versus clinic–based DOT for continuation phase TB treatment in Armenia: a cluster randomized trial
BACKGROUND: WHO’s directly observed therapy (DOT) strategy for tuberculosis (TB) treatment depends upon a well–organized healthcare system. This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of self-administered drug intake supported by a family member versus in-clinic DOT. METHODS: This open–label, na...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7183136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32334553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-1141-y |
_version_ | 1783526373463162880 |
---|---|
author | Khachadourian, Vahe Truzyan, Nune Harutyunyan, Arusyak Petrosyan, Varduhi Davtyan, Hayk Davtyan, Karapet van den Boom, Martin Thompson, Michael E. |
author_facet | Khachadourian, Vahe Truzyan, Nune Harutyunyan, Arusyak Petrosyan, Varduhi Davtyan, Hayk Davtyan, Karapet van den Boom, Martin Thompson, Michael E. |
author_sort | Khachadourian, Vahe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: WHO’s directly observed therapy (DOT) strategy for tuberculosis (TB) treatment depends upon a well–organized healthcare system. This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of self-administered drug intake supported by a family member versus in-clinic DOT. METHODS: This open–label, nationally-representative stratified cluster randomized controlled non–inferiority trial with two parallel equal arms involved drug–susceptible pulmonary TB patients in the continuation treatment phase. We randomly assigned outpatient–TB–centres (52 clusters) to intervention and control arms. The intervention included an educational/counseling session to enhance treatment adherence; weekly visits to outpatient–TB–centres to receive medication, and daily SMS medication reminders and phone calls to track adherence and record side effects. Controls followed clinical DOT at Outpatient–TB–centres. Both groups participated in baseline and 4–5 months follow–up surveys. The trial’s non–inferiority comparisons include: treatment success as the clinical (primary) outcome and medication adherence (self–reported), knowledge, depressive symptoms, stigma, quality of life, and social support as non–clinical (secondary) outcomes. RESULTS: Per–protocol analysis showed that the intervention (n = 187) and control (n = 198) arms achieved successful treatment outcome of 92.0 and 92.9%, respectively, indicating that the treatment success in the intervention group was non–inferior to DOT. Knowledge, depression, stigma, quality of life, and social support also showed non–inferiority, demonstrating substantial improvement over time for knowledge (change in the intervention = 1.05: 95%CL (0.49, 1.60); change in the control = 1.09: 95%CL (0.56, 1.64)), depression score (change in the intervention = − 3.56: 95%CL (− 4.99, − 2.13); change in the control = − 1.88: 95% CL (− 3.26, − 0.49)) and quality of life (change in the intervention = 5.01: 95%CL (− 0.64, 10.66); change in the control = 7.29: 95%CL (1.77, 12.81)). The intervention resulted in improved treatment adherence. CONCLUSIONS: This socially empowering alternative strategy might be a preferable alternative to DOT available to patients in Armenia and in other countries. Further research evaluating cost effectiveness of the intervention and generalizability of the results is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02082340, March 10, 2014. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7183136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71831362020-04-28 People–centred care versus clinic–based DOT for continuation phase TB treatment in Armenia: a cluster randomized trial Khachadourian, Vahe Truzyan, Nune Harutyunyan, Arusyak Petrosyan, Varduhi Davtyan, Hayk Davtyan, Karapet van den Boom, Martin Thompson, Michael E. BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: WHO’s directly observed therapy (DOT) strategy for tuberculosis (TB) treatment depends upon a well–organized healthcare system. This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of self-administered drug intake supported by a family member versus in-clinic DOT. METHODS: This open–label, nationally-representative stratified cluster randomized controlled non–inferiority trial with two parallel equal arms involved drug–susceptible pulmonary TB patients in the continuation treatment phase. We randomly assigned outpatient–TB–centres (52 clusters) to intervention and control arms. The intervention included an educational/counseling session to enhance treatment adherence; weekly visits to outpatient–TB–centres to receive medication, and daily SMS medication reminders and phone calls to track adherence and record side effects. Controls followed clinical DOT at Outpatient–TB–centres. Both groups participated in baseline and 4–5 months follow–up surveys. The trial’s non–inferiority comparisons include: treatment success as the clinical (primary) outcome and medication adherence (self–reported), knowledge, depressive symptoms, stigma, quality of life, and social support as non–clinical (secondary) outcomes. RESULTS: Per–protocol analysis showed that the intervention (n = 187) and control (n = 198) arms achieved successful treatment outcome of 92.0 and 92.9%, respectively, indicating that the treatment success in the intervention group was non–inferior to DOT. Knowledge, depression, stigma, quality of life, and social support also showed non–inferiority, demonstrating substantial improvement over time for knowledge (change in the intervention = 1.05: 95%CL (0.49, 1.60); change in the control = 1.09: 95%CL (0.56, 1.64)), depression score (change in the intervention = − 3.56: 95%CL (− 4.99, − 2.13); change in the control = − 1.88: 95% CL (− 3.26, − 0.49)) and quality of life (change in the intervention = 5.01: 95%CL (− 0.64, 10.66); change in the control = 7.29: 95%CL (1.77, 12.81)). The intervention resulted in improved treatment adherence. CONCLUSIONS: This socially empowering alternative strategy might be a preferable alternative to DOT available to patients in Armenia and in other countries. Further research evaluating cost effectiveness of the intervention and generalizability of the results is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02082340, March 10, 2014. BioMed Central 2020-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7183136/ /pubmed/32334553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-1141-y Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Khachadourian, Vahe Truzyan, Nune Harutyunyan, Arusyak Petrosyan, Varduhi Davtyan, Hayk Davtyan, Karapet van den Boom, Martin Thompson, Michael E. People–centred care versus clinic–based DOT for continuation phase TB treatment in Armenia: a cluster randomized trial |
title | People–centred care versus clinic–based DOT for continuation phase TB treatment in Armenia: a cluster randomized trial |
title_full | People–centred care versus clinic–based DOT for continuation phase TB treatment in Armenia: a cluster randomized trial |
title_fullStr | People–centred care versus clinic–based DOT for continuation phase TB treatment in Armenia: a cluster randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | People–centred care versus clinic–based DOT for continuation phase TB treatment in Armenia: a cluster randomized trial |
title_short | People–centred care versus clinic–based DOT for continuation phase TB treatment in Armenia: a cluster randomized trial |
title_sort | people–centred care versus clinic–based dot for continuation phase tb treatment in armenia: a cluster randomized trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7183136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32334553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-1141-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khachadourianvahe peoplecentredcareversusclinicbaseddotforcontinuationphasetbtreatmentinarmeniaaclusterrandomizedtrial AT truzyannune peoplecentredcareversusclinicbaseddotforcontinuationphasetbtreatmentinarmeniaaclusterrandomizedtrial AT harutyunyanarusyak peoplecentredcareversusclinicbaseddotforcontinuationphasetbtreatmentinarmeniaaclusterrandomizedtrial AT petrosyanvarduhi peoplecentredcareversusclinicbaseddotforcontinuationphasetbtreatmentinarmeniaaclusterrandomizedtrial AT davtyanhayk peoplecentredcareversusclinicbaseddotforcontinuationphasetbtreatmentinarmeniaaclusterrandomizedtrial AT davtyankarapet peoplecentredcareversusclinicbaseddotforcontinuationphasetbtreatmentinarmeniaaclusterrandomizedtrial AT vandenboommartin peoplecentredcareversusclinicbaseddotforcontinuationphasetbtreatmentinarmeniaaclusterrandomizedtrial AT thompsonmichaele peoplecentredcareversusclinicbaseddotforcontinuationphasetbtreatmentinarmeniaaclusterrandomizedtrial |