Cargando…

Effect of diabetes mellitus on TB drug concentrations in Tanzanian patients

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with poor TB treatment outcome. Previous studies examining the effect of DM on TB drug concentrations yielded conflicting results. No studies have been conducted to date in an African population. OBJECTIVES: To compare exposure to TB drugs in Tanzania...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mtabho, Charles M, Semvua, Hadija H, van den Boogaard, Jossy, Irongo, Constantine F, Boeree, Martin J, Colbers, Angela, Burger, David M, van Crevel, Reinout, van der Ven, Andre J A M, Kibiki, Gibson S, Tostmann, Alma, Aarnoutse, Rob E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7183353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31651031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkz368
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with poor TB treatment outcome. Previous studies examining the effect of DM on TB drug concentrations yielded conflicting results. No studies have been conducted to date in an African population. OBJECTIVES: To compare exposure to TB drugs in Tanzanian TB patients with and without DM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective pharmacokinetic study was performed among 20 diabetic and 20 non-diabetic Tanzanian TB patients during the intensive phase of TB treatment. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters of isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol were compared using an independent-sample t-test on log-transformed data. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to assess the effects of DM, gender, age, weight, HIV status and acetylator status on exposure to TB drugs. RESULTS: A trend was shown for 25% lower total exposure (AUC(0–24)) to rifampicin among diabetics versus non-diabetics (29.9 versus 39.9 mg·h/L, P=0.052). The AUC(0–24) and peak concentration (C(max)) of isoniazid were also lower in diabetic TB patients (5.4 versus 10.6 mg·h/L, P=0.015 and 1.6 versus 2.8 mg/L, P=0.013). Pyrazinamide AUC(0–24) and C(max) values were non-significantly lower among diabetics (P=0.08 and 0.09). In multivariate analyses, DM remained an independent predictor of exposure to isoniazid and rifampicin, next to acetylator status for isoniazid. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for individualized dosing of isoniazid and rifampicin based on plasma concentration measurements (therapeutic drug monitoring) and for clinical trials on higher doses of these TB drugs in patients with TB and DM.