Cargando…

Quality improvement education for medical students: a near-peer pilot study

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement (QI) is an essential component of modern clinical practice. Front-line professionals offer valuable perspectives on areas for improvement and are motivated to deliver change. In the UK, all junior doctors are expected to participate in QI in order to advance to the ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGeorge, Elizabeth, Coughlan, Charles, Fawcett, Martha, Klaber, Robert Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7183591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32334572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02020-9
_version_ 1783526448820125696
author McGeorge, Elizabeth
Coughlan, Charles
Fawcett, Martha
Klaber, Robert Edward
author_facet McGeorge, Elizabeth
Coughlan, Charles
Fawcett, Martha
Klaber, Robert Edward
author_sort McGeorge, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quality improvement (QI) is an essential component of modern clinical practice. Front-line professionals offer valuable perspectives on areas for improvement and are motivated to deliver change. In the UK, all junior doctors are expected to participate in QI in order to advance to the next stage of their training. However, UK undergraduates receive no standardized training in QI methods. This is perpetuated within medical schools by a lack of teaching capacity and competing priorities, and may lead to tokenistic engagement with future QI projects. METHODS: We describe a near-peer teaching programme designed to introduce students to QI methods. This pilot study was conceived and delivered in full by junior doctors and used existing resources to ensure high quality teaching content. 111 fifth-year medical students from the University of Cambridge were taught in interactive, participative workshops that encourage them to develop their own QI change ideas and projects. Core topics included the model for improvement, driver diagrams, stakeholder engagement, measurement for improvement and analysing and presenting data. Students completed surveys before and immediately after this intervention to assess their understanding of and confidence in utilizing QI methods. Questionnaires were also completed by junior doctor tutors. RESULTS: Analysis of questionnaires completed before and immediately after the intervention revealed statistically significant improvements in students’ self-reported understanding of QI (p < 0.05) and confidence in applying techniques to their own work (p < 0.05). Students expressed a preference for QI teaching delivered by junior doctors, citing a relaxed learning environment and greater relevance to their stage of training. Tutors reported increased confidence in using QI techniques and a greater willingness to engage with QI in future. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-centre study, near-peer teaching produced significant improvements in students’ self-reported understanding of QI and confidence in applying QI methods. Near-peer teaching may constitute a sustainable means of teaching essential QI skills at undergraduate level. Future work must evaluate objective measures of student engagement with and competence in conducting QI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7183591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71835912020-04-29 Quality improvement education for medical students: a near-peer pilot study McGeorge, Elizabeth Coughlan, Charles Fawcett, Martha Klaber, Robert Edward BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Quality improvement (QI) is an essential component of modern clinical practice. Front-line professionals offer valuable perspectives on areas for improvement and are motivated to deliver change. In the UK, all junior doctors are expected to participate in QI in order to advance to the next stage of their training. However, UK undergraduates receive no standardized training in QI methods. This is perpetuated within medical schools by a lack of teaching capacity and competing priorities, and may lead to tokenistic engagement with future QI projects. METHODS: We describe a near-peer teaching programme designed to introduce students to QI methods. This pilot study was conceived and delivered in full by junior doctors and used existing resources to ensure high quality teaching content. 111 fifth-year medical students from the University of Cambridge were taught in interactive, participative workshops that encourage them to develop their own QI change ideas and projects. Core topics included the model for improvement, driver diagrams, stakeholder engagement, measurement for improvement and analysing and presenting data. Students completed surveys before and immediately after this intervention to assess their understanding of and confidence in utilizing QI methods. Questionnaires were also completed by junior doctor tutors. RESULTS: Analysis of questionnaires completed before and immediately after the intervention revealed statistically significant improvements in students’ self-reported understanding of QI (p < 0.05) and confidence in applying techniques to their own work (p < 0.05). Students expressed a preference for QI teaching delivered by junior doctors, citing a relaxed learning environment and greater relevance to their stage of training. Tutors reported increased confidence in using QI techniques and a greater willingness to engage with QI in future. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-centre study, near-peer teaching produced significant improvements in students’ self-reported understanding of QI and confidence in applying QI methods. Near-peer teaching may constitute a sustainable means of teaching essential QI skills at undergraduate level. Future work must evaluate objective measures of student engagement with and competence in conducting QI. BioMed Central 2020-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7183591/ /pubmed/32334572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02020-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
McGeorge, Elizabeth
Coughlan, Charles
Fawcett, Martha
Klaber, Robert Edward
Quality improvement education for medical students: a near-peer pilot study
title Quality improvement education for medical students: a near-peer pilot study
title_full Quality improvement education for medical students: a near-peer pilot study
title_fullStr Quality improvement education for medical students: a near-peer pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Quality improvement education for medical students: a near-peer pilot study
title_short Quality improvement education for medical students: a near-peer pilot study
title_sort quality improvement education for medical students: a near-peer pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7183591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32334572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02020-9
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgeorgeelizabeth qualityimprovementeducationformedicalstudentsanearpeerpilotstudy
AT coughlancharles qualityimprovementeducationformedicalstudentsanearpeerpilotstudy
AT fawcettmartha qualityimprovementeducationformedicalstudentsanearpeerpilotstudy
AT klaberrobertedward qualityimprovementeducationformedicalstudentsanearpeerpilotstudy