Cargando…
Bayesian joint modelling of longitudinal and time to event data: a methodological review
BACKGROUND: In clinical research, there is an increasing interest in joint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event data, since it reduces bias in parameter estimation and increases the efficiency of statistical inference. Inference and prediction from frequentist approaches of joint models have...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7183597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32336264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00976-2 |
_version_ | 1783526450258771968 |
---|---|
author | Alsefri, Maha Sudell, Maria García-Fiñana, Marta Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi |
author_facet | Alsefri, Maha Sudell, Maria García-Fiñana, Marta Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi |
author_sort | Alsefri, Maha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In clinical research, there is an increasing interest in joint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event data, since it reduces bias in parameter estimation and increases the efficiency of statistical inference. Inference and prediction from frequentist approaches of joint models have been extensively reviewed, and due to the recent popularity of data-driven Bayesian approaches, a review on current Bayesian estimation of joint model is useful to draw recommendations for future researches. METHODS: We have undertaken a comprehensive review on Bayesian univariate and multivariate joint models. We focused on type of outcomes, model assumptions, association structure, estimation algorithm, dynamic prediction and software implementation. RESULTS: A total of 89 articles have been identified, consisting of 75 methodological and 14 applied articles. The most common approach to model the longitudinal and time-to-event outcomes jointly included linear mixed effect models with proportional hazards. A random effect association structure was generally used for linking the two sub-models. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms were commonly used (93% articles) to estimate the model parameters. Only six articles were primarily focused on dynamic predictions for longitudinal or event-time outcomes. CONCLUSION: Methodologies for a wide variety of data types have been proposed; however the research is limited if the association between the two outcomes changes over time, and there is also lack of methods to determine the association structure in the absence of clinical background knowledge. Joint modelling has been proved to be beneficial in producing more accurate dynamic prediction; however, there is a lack of sufficient tools to validate the prediction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7183597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71835972020-04-29 Bayesian joint modelling of longitudinal and time to event data: a methodological review Alsefri, Maha Sudell, Maria García-Fiñana, Marta Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: In clinical research, there is an increasing interest in joint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event data, since it reduces bias in parameter estimation and increases the efficiency of statistical inference. Inference and prediction from frequentist approaches of joint models have been extensively reviewed, and due to the recent popularity of data-driven Bayesian approaches, a review on current Bayesian estimation of joint model is useful to draw recommendations for future researches. METHODS: We have undertaken a comprehensive review on Bayesian univariate and multivariate joint models. We focused on type of outcomes, model assumptions, association structure, estimation algorithm, dynamic prediction and software implementation. RESULTS: A total of 89 articles have been identified, consisting of 75 methodological and 14 applied articles. The most common approach to model the longitudinal and time-to-event outcomes jointly included linear mixed effect models with proportional hazards. A random effect association structure was generally used for linking the two sub-models. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms were commonly used (93% articles) to estimate the model parameters. Only six articles were primarily focused on dynamic predictions for longitudinal or event-time outcomes. CONCLUSION: Methodologies for a wide variety of data types have been proposed; however the research is limited if the association between the two outcomes changes over time, and there is also lack of methods to determine the association structure in the absence of clinical background knowledge. Joint modelling has been proved to be beneficial in producing more accurate dynamic prediction; however, there is a lack of sufficient tools to validate the prediction. BioMed Central 2020-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7183597/ /pubmed/32336264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00976-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Alsefri, Maha Sudell, Maria García-Fiñana, Marta Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi Bayesian joint modelling of longitudinal and time to event data: a methodological review |
title | Bayesian joint modelling of longitudinal and time to event data: a methodological review |
title_full | Bayesian joint modelling of longitudinal and time to event data: a methodological review |
title_fullStr | Bayesian joint modelling of longitudinal and time to event data: a methodological review |
title_full_unstemmed | Bayesian joint modelling of longitudinal and time to event data: a methodological review |
title_short | Bayesian joint modelling of longitudinal and time to event data: a methodological review |
title_sort | bayesian joint modelling of longitudinal and time to event data: a methodological review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7183597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32336264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00976-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alsefrimaha bayesianjointmodellingoflongitudinalandtimetoeventdataamethodologicalreview AT sudellmaria bayesianjointmodellingoflongitudinalandtimetoeventdataamethodologicalreview AT garciafinanamarta bayesianjointmodellingoflongitudinalandtimetoeventdataamethodologicalreview AT kolamunnagedonaruwanthi bayesianjointmodellingoflongitudinalandtimetoeventdataamethodologicalreview |