Cargando…

Autonomous decisions by couples in reproductive care

BACKGROUND: Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening (ECS) is a genetic test offered to a general population or to couples who have no known risk of recessive and X-linked genetic diseases and are interested in becoming parents. A test may screen for carrier status of several autosomal recessive dis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matar, Amal, Höglund, Anna T., Segerdahl, Pär, Kihlbom, Ulrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7183638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32334575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00470-w
_version_ 1783526459976974336
author Matar, Amal
Höglund, Anna T.
Segerdahl, Pär
Kihlbom, Ulrik
author_facet Matar, Amal
Höglund, Anna T.
Segerdahl, Pär
Kihlbom, Ulrik
author_sort Matar, Amal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening (ECS) is a genetic test offered to a general population or to couples who have no known risk of recessive and X-linked genetic diseases and are interested in becoming parents. A test may screen for carrier status of several autosomal recessive diseases at one go. Such a program has been piloted in the Netherlands and may become a reality in more European countries in the future. The ethical rationale for such tests is that they enhance reproductive autonomy. The dominant conception of autonomy is individual-based. However, at the clinic, people deciding on preconception ECS will be counselled together and are expected to make a joint decision, as a couple. The aim of the present study was to develop an understanding of autonomous decisions made by couples in the context of reproductive technologies in general and of preconception ECS in particular. Further, to shed light on what occurs in reproductive clinics and suggest concrete implications for healthcare professionals. MAIN TEXT: Based on the shift in emphasis from individual autonomy to relational autonomy, a notion of couple autonomy was suggested and some features of this concept were outlined. First, that both partners are individually autonomous and that the decision is reached through a communicative process. In this process each partner should feel free to express his or her concerns and preferences, so no one partner dominates the discussion. Further, there should be adequate time for the couple to negotiate possible differences and conclude that the decision is right for them. The final decision should be reached through consensus of both partners without coercion, manipulation or miscommunication. Through concrete examples, the suggested notion of couple autonomy was applied to diverse clinical situations. CONCLUSIONS: A notion of couple autonomy can be fruitful for healthcare professionals by structuring their attention to and support of a couple who is required to make an autonomous joint decision concerning preconception ECS. A normative implication for healthcare staff is to allow the necessary time for decision-making and to promote a dialogue that can increase the power of the weaker part in a relationship.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7183638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71836382020-04-29 Autonomous decisions by couples in reproductive care Matar, Amal Höglund, Anna T. Segerdahl, Pär Kihlbom, Ulrik BMC Med Ethics Debate BACKGROUND: Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening (ECS) is a genetic test offered to a general population or to couples who have no known risk of recessive and X-linked genetic diseases and are interested in becoming parents. A test may screen for carrier status of several autosomal recessive diseases at one go. Such a program has been piloted in the Netherlands and may become a reality in more European countries in the future. The ethical rationale for such tests is that they enhance reproductive autonomy. The dominant conception of autonomy is individual-based. However, at the clinic, people deciding on preconception ECS will be counselled together and are expected to make a joint decision, as a couple. The aim of the present study was to develop an understanding of autonomous decisions made by couples in the context of reproductive technologies in general and of preconception ECS in particular. Further, to shed light on what occurs in reproductive clinics and suggest concrete implications for healthcare professionals. MAIN TEXT: Based on the shift in emphasis from individual autonomy to relational autonomy, a notion of couple autonomy was suggested and some features of this concept were outlined. First, that both partners are individually autonomous and that the decision is reached through a communicative process. In this process each partner should feel free to express his or her concerns and preferences, so no one partner dominates the discussion. Further, there should be adequate time for the couple to negotiate possible differences and conclude that the decision is right for them. The final decision should be reached through consensus of both partners without coercion, manipulation or miscommunication. Through concrete examples, the suggested notion of couple autonomy was applied to diverse clinical situations. CONCLUSIONS: A notion of couple autonomy can be fruitful for healthcare professionals by structuring their attention to and support of a couple who is required to make an autonomous joint decision concerning preconception ECS. A normative implication for healthcare staff is to allow the necessary time for decision-making and to promote a dialogue that can increase the power of the weaker part in a relationship. BioMed Central 2020-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7183638/ /pubmed/32334575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00470-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Debate
Matar, Amal
Höglund, Anna T.
Segerdahl, Pär
Kihlbom, Ulrik
Autonomous decisions by couples in reproductive care
title Autonomous decisions by couples in reproductive care
title_full Autonomous decisions by couples in reproductive care
title_fullStr Autonomous decisions by couples in reproductive care
title_full_unstemmed Autonomous decisions by couples in reproductive care
title_short Autonomous decisions by couples in reproductive care
title_sort autonomous decisions by couples in reproductive care
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7183638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32334575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00470-w
work_keys_str_mv AT mataramal autonomousdecisionsbycouplesinreproductivecare
AT hoglundannat autonomousdecisionsbycouplesinreproductivecare
AT segerdahlpar autonomousdecisionsbycouplesinreproductivecare
AT kihlbomulrik autonomousdecisionsbycouplesinreproductivecare