Cargando…
Prevalence of familial cluster headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: The population rate of familial cluster headache (CH) has been reported to be as high as 20% however this varies considerably across studies. To obtain a true estimate of family history in CH, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of previously published data. METHODS: Our...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7183702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32334514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01101-w |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: The population rate of familial cluster headache (CH) has been reported to be as high as 20% however this varies considerably across studies. To obtain a true estimate of family history in CH, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of previously published data. METHODS: Our systematic review involved a search of electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL) to identify and appraise studies of interest utilising the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. To further ameliorate the accuracy of our analysis we included an additional unpublished cohort of CH patients recruited at a tertiary referral centre for headache, who underwent detailed family history with diagnostic verification in relatives. Data was extracted and meta-analysis conducted to provide a true estimation of family history. RESULTS: In total, we identified 7 studies which fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The estimated true prevalence of CH patients with a positive family history was 6.27% (95% CI:4.65–8.40%) with an overall I(2) of 73%. Fitted models for gender subgroups showed higher estimates 9.26% (95% CI: 6.29–13.43%) in females. However the I(2) for the female model was 58.42% and significant (p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Our findings estimate a rate of family history in CH to be approximately 6.27% (95% CI: 4.65–8.40%). While estimates were larger for female probands, we demonstrated high heterogeneity in this subgroup. These findings further support a genetic role in the aetiology of CH. |
---|