Cargando…

Erosive Potential of 1% Phytic Acid on Radicular Dentine at Different Time Intervals

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this in-vitro study was to compare the erosive potential and smear layer removal ability of 1% Phytic acid (IP6) and 17% Ethylenediaminetetaacetic acid (EDTA). METHODS: Canal preparation of 225 single rooted extracted human teeth was performed with Protaper NiTi rotary in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Afshan, Zareen, Jat, Shahbaz Ahmed, Khan, Javeria Ali, Hasan, Arshad, Rehman Qazi, Fazal Ur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7183798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32342035
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2019.02411
_version_ 1783526493717004288
author Afshan, Zareen
Jat, Shahbaz Ahmed
Khan, Javeria Ali
Hasan, Arshad
Rehman Qazi, Fazal Ur
author_facet Afshan, Zareen
Jat, Shahbaz Ahmed
Khan, Javeria Ali
Hasan, Arshad
Rehman Qazi, Fazal Ur
author_sort Afshan, Zareen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this in-vitro study was to compare the erosive potential and smear layer removal ability of 1% Phytic acid (IP6) and 17% Ethylenediaminetetaacetic acid (EDTA). METHODS: Canal preparation of 225 single rooted extracted human teeth was performed with Protaper NiTi rotary instruments. Teeth were divided into three groups according to the final irrigation protocol. Group 1: Saline irrigation (n=75), Group 2: 17% EDTA (n=75), Group 3: 1% Phytic Acid (n=75). Roots were splitted and observed under Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) for erosion and smear layer removal. Mean differences between the groups for smear layer removal and erosion were assessed using the Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U test. (P≤0.05) Friedman and Willcoxon Signed Rank tests were used to make comparisons within the groups. RESULTS: Group 3 was significantly less erosive than Group 2 at all root portions (P<0.001). With regards to smear layer removal, group 2 (EDTA) removed more smear layer compared to group 3 (Phytic acid) at all root portions (P<0.001). Both 17% EDTA and 1% IP6 removed significantly less smear layer in the apical root portion. Intra group comparisons revealed no significant differences at any root level. There was a time dependent increase in erosion and smear layer removal in Group 2, with severe erosion at 5 minutes time interval. In Group 3, however, there was moderate erosion and smear removal at 3 and 5 minutes interval. CONCLUSION: IP6 at the concentration of 1% and pH 3 was less erosive than 17% EDTA. It exhibited moderate smear layer removal ability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7183798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71837982020-04-27 Erosive Potential of 1% Phytic Acid on Radicular Dentine at Different Time Intervals Afshan, Zareen Jat, Shahbaz Ahmed Khan, Javeria Ali Hasan, Arshad Rehman Qazi, Fazal Ur Eur Endod J Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of this in-vitro study was to compare the erosive potential and smear layer removal ability of 1% Phytic acid (IP6) and 17% Ethylenediaminetetaacetic acid (EDTA). METHODS: Canal preparation of 225 single rooted extracted human teeth was performed with Protaper NiTi rotary instruments. Teeth were divided into three groups according to the final irrigation protocol. Group 1: Saline irrigation (n=75), Group 2: 17% EDTA (n=75), Group 3: 1% Phytic Acid (n=75). Roots were splitted and observed under Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) for erosion and smear layer removal. Mean differences between the groups for smear layer removal and erosion were assessed using the Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U test. (P≤0.05) Friedman and Willcoxon Signed Rank tests were used to make comparisons within the groups. RESULTS: Group 3 was significantly less erosive than Group 2 at all root portions (P<0.001). With regards to smear layer removal, group 2 (EDTA) removed more smear layer compared to group 3 (Phytic acid) at all root portions (P<0.001). Both 17% EDTA and 1% IP6 removed significantly less smear layer in the apical root portion. Intra group comparisons revealed no significant differences at any root level. There was a time dependent increase in erosion and smear layer removal in Group 2, with severe erosion at 5 minutes time interval. In Group 3, however, there was moderate erosion and smear removal at 3 and 5 minutes interval. CONCLUSION: IP6 at the concentration of 1% and pH 3 was less erosive than 17% EDTA. It exhibited moderate smear layer removal ability. Kare Publishing 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7183798/ /pubmed/32342035 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2019.02411 Text en Copyright: © 2020 European Endodontic Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Afshan, Zareen
Jat, Shahbaz Ahmed
Khan, Javeria Ali
Hasan, Arshad
Rehman Qazi, Fazal Ur
Erosive Potential of 1% Phytic Acid on Radicular Dentine at Different Time Intervals
title Erosive Potential of 1% Phytic Acid on Radicular Dentine at Different Time Intervals
title_full Erosive Potential of 1% Phytic Acid on Radicular Dentine at Different Time Intervals
title_fullStr Erosive Potential of 1% Phytic Acid on Radicular Dentine at Different Time Intervals
title_full_unstemmed Erosive Potential of 1% Phytic Acid on Radicular Dentine at Different Time Intervals
title_short Erosive Potential of 1% Phytic Acid on Radicular Dentine at Different Time Intervals
title_sort erosive potential of 1% phytic acid on radicular dentine at different time intervals
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7183798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32342035
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2019.02411
work_keys_str_mv AT afshanzareen erosivepotentialof1phyticacidonradiculardentineatdifferenttimeintervals
AT jatshahbazahmed erosivepotentialof1phyticacidonradiculardentineatdifferenttimeintervals
AT khanjaveriaali erosivepotentialof1phyticacidonradiculardentineatdifferenttimeintervals
AT hasanarshad erosivepotentialof1phyticacidonradiculardentineatdifferenttimeintervals
AT rehmanqazifazalur erosivepotentialof1phyticacidonradiculardentineatdifferenttimeintervals