Cargando…

Antibacterial Efficacy of the Grape Seed Extract as an Irrigant for Root Canal Preparation

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research was to compare relative effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite 5.25% (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine gel (CHX) and 6.5 % grape seed extract (GSE) against Enterococcus faecalis using instrument Reciproc R25 in root canal preparation. METHODS: Forty-five mesiobuccal roo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’aviz, Fernando Soveral, Lodi, Ediléia, Souza, Matheus Albino, Farina, Ana Paula, Cecchin, Doglas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7183804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32342036
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2019.85057
_version_ 1783526495258411008
author D’aviz, Fernando Soveral
Lodi, Ediléia
Souza, Matheus Albino
Farina, Ana Paula
Cecchin, Doglas
author_facet D’aviz, Fernando Soveral
Lodi, Ediléia
Souza, Matheus Albino
Farina, Ana Paula
Cecchin, Doglas
author_sort D’aviz, Fernando Soveral
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research was to compare relative effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite 5.25% (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine gel (CHX) and 6.5 % grape seed extract (GSE) against Enterococcus faecalis using instrument Reciproc R25 in root canal preparation. METHODS: Forty-five mesiobuccal root canals from extracted human maxillary molars were collected and infected with Enterococcus faecalis. The samples were divided into five groups according to the different types of irrigants: saline (positive control) (n=5); in the other groups were used 10 root canals for each group: NaOCl+EDTA; CHX gel+EDTA; GSE solution+EDTA; GSE gel+EDTA. All the groups were prepared with reciprocating instruments Reciproc R25. Bacterial reduction was measured by two-way ANOVA (P<0.001) followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc tests, from the counting of colony forming units (CFUs) from samples collected before instrumentation and after. The significance level established at 5% (P<0.05). RESULTS: The group prepared with the NaOCl resulted in highest antimicrobial capacity among of all (P>0.05), followed by CHX and GSE gel (P<0.05). Control and GSE solution showed similar results (P<0.05) and resulted in the lowest percentage of the reduction of the microorganism into the root canals. CONCLUSION: NaOCl had the higher elimination capacity of Enterococcus faecalis than GSE and CHX.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7183804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71838042020-04-27 Antibacterial Efficacy of the Grape Seed Extract as an Irrigant for Root Canal Preparation D’aviz, Fernando Soveral Lodi, Ediléia Souza, Matheus Albino Farina, Ana Paula Cecchin, Doglas Eur Endod J Original Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research was to compare relative effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite 5.25% (NaOCl), 2% chlorhexidine gel (CHX) and 6.5 % grape seed extract (GSE) against Enterococcus faecalis using instrument Reciproc R25 in root canal preparation. METHODS: Forty-five mesiobuccal root canals from extracted human maxillary molars were collected and infected with Enterococcus faecalis. The samples were divided into five groups according to the different types of irrigants: saline (positive control) (n=5); in the other groups were used 10 root canals for each group: NaOCl+EDTA; CHX gel+EDTA; GSE solution+EDTA; GSE gel+EDTA. All the groups were prepared with reciprocating instruments Reciproc R25. Bacterial reduction was measured by two-way ANOVA (P<0.001) followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc tests, from the counting of colony forming units (CFUs) from samples collected before instrumentation and after. The significance level established at 5% (P<0.05). RESULTS: The group prepared with the NaOCl resulted in highest antimicrobial capacity among of all (P>0.05), followed by CHX and GSE gel (P<0.05). Control and GSE solution showed similar results (P<0.05) and resulted in the lowest percentage of the reduction of the microorganism into the root canals. CONCLUSION: NaOCl had the higher elimination capacity of Enterococcus faecalis than GSE and CHX. Kare Publishing 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7183804/ /pubmed/32342036 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2019.85057 Text en Copyright: © 2020 European Endodontic Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
D’aviz, Fernando Soveral
Lodi, Ediléia
Souza, Matheus Albino
Farina, Ana Paula
Cecchin, Doglas
Antibacterial Efficacy of the Grape Seed Extract as an Irrigant for Root Canal Preparation
title Antibacterial Efficacy of the Grape Seed Extract as an Irrigant for Root Canal Preparation
title_full Antibacterial Efficacy of the Grape Seed Extract as an Irrigant for Root Canal Preparation
title_fullStr Antibacterial Efficacy of the Grape Seed Extract as an Irrigant for Root Canal Preparation
title_full_unstemmed Antibacterial Efficacy of the Grape Seed Extract as an Irrigant for Root Canal Preparation
title_short Antibacterial Efficacy of the Grape Seed Extract as an Irrigant for Root Canal Preparation
title_sort antibacterial efficacy of the grape seed extract as an irrigant for root canal preparation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7183804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32342036
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/eej.2019.85057
work_keys_str_mv AT davizfernandosoveral antibacterialefficacyofthegrapeseedextractasanirrigantforrootcanalpreparation
AT lodiedileia antibacterialefficacyofthegrapeseedextractasanirrigantforrootcanalpreparation
AT souzamatheusalbino antibacterialefficacyofthegrapeseedextractasanirrigantforrootcanalpreparation
AT farinaanapaula antibacterialefficacyofthegrapeseedextractasanirrigantforrootcanalpreparation
AT cecchindoglas antibacterialefficacyofthegrapeseedextractasanirrigantforrootcanalpreparation