Cargando…
Assessing TEG6S reliability between devices and across multiple time points: A prospective thromboelastography validation study
The TEG6S is a novel haemostasis analyser utilising resonance technology. It offers potentially greater coagulation information and ease of use, however has not been independently validated in a clinical setting. We aimed to determine if the TEG6S is reliable between devices and across time points....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7184600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32341418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63964-y |
_version_ | 1783526617439535104 |
---|---|
author | Lloyd-Donald, Patryck Churilov, Leonid Cheong, Brandon Bellomo, Rinaldo McCall, Peter R. Mårtensson, Johan Glassford, Neil Weinberg, Laurence |
author_facet | Lloyd-Donald, Patryck Churilov, Leonid Cheong, Brandon Bellomo, Rinaldo McCall, Peter R. Mårtensson, Johan Glassford, Neil Weinberg, Laurence |
author_sort | Lloyd-Donald, Patryck |
collection | PubMed |
description | The TEG6S is a novel haemostasis analyser utilising resonance technology. It offers potentially greater coagulation information and ease of use, however has not been independently validated in a clinical setting. We aimed to determine if the TEG6S is reliable between devices and across time points. We performed a prospective observational study with ethical approval. For interdevice reliability, we performed simultaneous analysis on two TEG6S devices on 25 adult ICU patients. For time point reliability, we performed repeated sampling across five different time points on 15 adult participants. Blood was collected with informed consent, or as standard care, before four-channel citrated kaolin analysis. We observed almost perfect interdevice reliability across all TEG parameters. The Lin’s concordance correlation coefficients (95% CI, major axis regression slope, intercept) were R-time: 0.96 (0.92–0.99, 0.88, 0.57); K-time: 0.93 (0.87–0.98, 1.07, 0.00); Alpha Angle: 0.87 (0.78–0.96, 1.20, −14.10); Maximum Amplitude: 0.99 (0.98–0.99, 1.02, −1.38); Clot Lysis: 0.89 (0.82–0.97, 1.20, 0.07). Additionally, we observed moderate-to-high reliability across time points. Demonstrating almost perfect agreement across different devices and moderate-to-high reliability across multiple time points, suggests the TEG6S platform can be used with haemostatic accuracy and generalisability. This has potentially significant implications for clinical practice and multi-site research programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7184600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71846002020-04-29 Assessing TEG6S reliability between devices and across multiple time points: A prospective thromboelastography validation study Lloyd-Donald, Patryck Churilov, Leonid Cheong, Brandon Bellomo, Rinaldo McCall, Peter R. Mårtensson, Johan Glassford, Neil Weinberg, Laurence Sci Rep Article The TEG6S is a novel haemostasis analyser utilising resonance technology. It offers potentially greater coagulation information and ease of use, however has not been independently validated in a clinical setting. We aimed to determine if the TEG6S is reliable between devices and across time points. We performed a prospective observational study with ethical approval. For interdevice reliability, we performed simultaneous analysis on two TEG6S devices on 25 adult ICU patients. For time point reliability, we performed repeated sampling across five different time points on 15 adult participants. Blood was collected with informed consent, or as standard care, before four-channel citrated kaolin analysis. We observed almost perfect interdevice reliability across all TEG parameters. The Lin’s concordance correlation coefficients (95% CI, major axis regression slope, intercept) were R-time: 0.96 (0.92–0.99, 0.88, 0.57); K-time: 0.93 (0.87–0.98, 1.07, 0.00); Alpha Angle: 0.87 (0.78–0.96, 1.20, −14.10); Maximum Amplitude: 0.99 (0.98–0.99, 1.02, −1.38); Clot Lysis: 0.89 (0.82–0.97, 1.20, 0.07). Additionally, we observed moderate-to-high reliability across time points. Demonstrating almost perfect agreement across different devices and moderate-to-high reliability across multiple time points, suggests the TEG6S platform can be used with haemostatic accuracy and generalisability. This has potentially significant implications for clinical practice and multi-site research programs. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7184600/ /pubmed/32341418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63964-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Lloyd-Donald, Patryck Churilov, Leonid Cheong, Brandon Bellomo, Rinaldo McCall, Peter R. Mårtensson, Johan Glassford, Neil Weinberg, Laurence Assessing TEG6S reliability between devices and across multiple time points: A prospective thromboelastography validation study |
title | Assessing TEG6S reliability between devices and across multiple time points: A prospective thromboelastography validation study |
title_full | Assessing TEG6S reliability between devices and across multiple time points: A prospective thromboelastography validation study |
title_fullStr | Assessing TEG6S reliability between devices and across multiple time points: A prospective thromboelastography validation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing TEG6S reliability between devices and across multiple time points: A prospective thromboelastography validation study |
title_short | Assessing TEG6S reliability between devices and across multiple time points: A prospective thromboelastography validation study |
title_sort | assessing teg6s reliability between devices and across multiple time points: a prospective thromboelastography validation study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7184600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32341418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63964-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lloyddonaldpatryck assessingteg6sreliabilitybetweendevicesandacrossmultipletimepointsaprospectivethromboelastographyvalidationstudy AT churilovleonid assessingteg6sreliabilitybetweendevicesandacrossmultipletimepointsaprospectivethromboelastographyvalidationstudy AT cheongbrandon assessingteg6sreliabilitybetweendevicesandacrossmultipletimepointsaprospectivethromboelastographyvalidationstudy AT bellomorinaldo assessingteg6sreliabilitybetweendevicesandacrossmultipletimepointsaprospectivethromboelastographyvalidationstudy AT mccallpeterr assessingteg6sreliabilitybetweendevicesandacrossmultipletimepointsaprospectivethromboelastographyvalidationstudy AT martenssonjohan assessingteg6sreliabilitybetweendevicesandacrossmultipletimepointsaprospectivethromboelastographyvalidationstudy AT glassfordneil assessingteg6sreliabilitybetweendevicesandacrossmultipletimepointsaprospectivethromboelastographyvalidationstudy AT weinberglaurence assessingteg6sreliabilitybetweendevicesandacrossmultipletimepointsaprospectivethromboelastographyvalidationstudy |