Cargando…

Spatial Comparisons of Mechanosensory Information Govern the Grooming Sequence in Drosophila

Animals integrate information from different sensory modalities, body parts, and time points to inform behavioral choice, but the relevant sensory comparisons and the underlying neural circuits are still largely unknown. We use the grooming behavior of Drosophila melanogaster as a model to investiga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Neil, Guo, Li, Simpson, Julie H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7184881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32142695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.045
_version_ 1783526664596094976
author Zhang, Neil
Guo, Li
Simpson, Julie H.
author_facet Zhang, Neil
Guo, Li
Simpson, Julie H.
author_sort Zhang, Neil
collection PubMed
description Animals integrate information from different sensory modalities, body parts, and time points to inform behavioral choice, but the relevant sensory comparisons and the underlying neural circuits are still largely unknown. We use the grooming behavior of Drosophila melanogaster as a model to investigate the sensory comparisons that govern a motor sequence. Flies perform grooming movements spontaneously, but when covered with dust, they clean their bodies following an anterior-to-posterior sequence. After investigating different sensory modalities that could detect dust, we focus on mechanosensory bristle neurons, whose optogenetic activation induces a similar sequence. Computational modeling predicts that higher sensory input strength to the head will cause anterior grooming to occur first. We test this prediction using an optogenetic competition assay whereby two targeted light beams independently activate mechanosensory bristle neurons on different body parts. We find that the initial choice of grooming movement is determined by the ratio of sensory inputs to different body parts. In dust-covered flies, sensory inputs change as a result of successful cleaning movements. Simulations from our model suggest that this change results in sequence progression. One possibility is that flies perform frequent comparisons between anterior and posterior sensory inputs, and the changing ratios drive different behavior choices. Alternatively, flies may track the temporal change in sensory input to a given body part to measure cleaning effectiveness. The first hypothesis is supported by our optogenetic competition experiments: iterative spatial comparisons of sensory inputs between body parts is essential for organizing grooming movements in sequence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7184881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71848812021-03-23 Spatial Comparisons of Mechanosensory Information Govern the Grooming Sequence in Drosophila Zhang, Neil Guo, Li Simpson, Julie H. Curr Biol Article Animals integrate information from different sensory modalities, body parts, and time points to inform behavioral choice, but the relevant sensory comparisons and the underlying neural circuits are still largely unknown. We use the grooming behavior of Drosophila melanogaster as a model to investigate the sensory comparisons that govern a motor sequence. Flies perform grooming movements spontaneously, but when covered with dust, they clean their bodies following an anterior-to-posterior sequence. After investigating different sensory modalities that could detect dust, we focus on mechanosensory bristle neurons, whose optogenetic activation induces a similar sequence. Computational modeling predicts that higher sensory input strength to the head will cause anterior grooming to occur first. We test this prediction using an optogenetic competition assay whereby two targeted light beams independently activate mechanosensory bristle neurons on different body parts. We find that the initial choice of grooming movement is determined by the ratio of sensory inputs to different body parts. In dust-covered flies, sensory inputs change as a result of successful cleaning movements. Simulations from our model suggest that this change results in sequence progression. One possibility is that flies perform frequent comparisons between anterior and posterior sensory inputs, and the changing ratios drive different behavior choices. Alternatively, flies may track the temporal change in sensory input to a given body part to measure cleaning effectiveness. The first hypothesis is supported by our optogenetic competition experiments: iterative spatial comparisons of sensory inputs between body parts is essential for organizing grooming movements in sequence. 2020-03-05 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7184881/ /pubmed/32142695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.045 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Neil
Guo, Li
Simpson, Julie H.
Spatial Comparisons of Mechanosensory Information Govern the Grooming Sequence in Drosophila
title Spatial Comparisons of Mechanosensory Information Govern the Grooming Sequence in Drosophila
title_full Spatial Comparisons of Mechanosensory Information Govern the Grooming Sequence in Drosophila
title_fullStr Spatial Comparisons of Mechanosensory Information Govern the Grooming Sequence in Drosophila
title_full_unstemmed Spatial Comparisons of Mechanosensory Information Govern the Grooming Sequence in Drosophila
title_short Spatial Comparisons of Mechanosensory Information Govern the Grooming Sequence in Drosophila
title_sort spatial comparisons of mechanosensory information govern the grooming sequence in drosophila
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7184881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32142695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.045
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangneil spatialcomparisonsofmechanosensoryinformationgovernthegroomingsequenceindrosophila
AT guoli spatialcomparisonsofmechanosensoryinformationgovernthegroomingsequenceindrosophila
AT simpsonjulieh spatialcomparisonsofmechanosensoryinformationgovernthegroomingsequenceindrosophila