Cargando…
U.S. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: Modeling and analysis
BACKGROUND: A stochastic discrete event simulation model was developed to assess the effectiveness of passenger screening for Pandemic Influenza (PI) at U.S. airport foreign entry. METHODS: International passengers arriving at 18 U.S. airports from Asia, Europe, South America, and Canada were assign...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7185379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19717097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2009.02.006 |
_version_ | 1783526747785920512 |
---|---|
author | Malone, John D. Brigantic, Robert Muller, George A. Gadgil, Ashok Delp, Woody McMahon, Benjamin H. Lee, Russell Kulesz, Jim Mihelic, F. Matthew |
author_facet | Malone, John D. Brigantic, Robert Muller, George A. Gadgil, Ashok Delp, Woody McMahon, Benjamin H. Lee, Russell Kulesz, Jim Mihelic, F. Matthew |
author_sort | Malone, John D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A stochastic discrete event simulation model was developed to assess the effectiveness of passenger screening for Pandemic Influenza (PI) at U.S. airport foreign entry. METHODS: International passengers arriving at 18 U.S. airports from Asia, Europe, South America, and Canada were assigned to one of three states: not infected, infected with PI, infected with other respiratory illness. Passengers passed through layered screening then exited the model. 80% screening effectiveness was assumed for symptomatic passengers; 6% asymptomatic passengers. RESULTS: In the first 100 days of a global pandemic, U.S. airport screening would evaluate over 17 M passengers with 800 K secondary screenings. 11,570 PI infected passengers (majority asymptomatic) would enter the U.S. undetected from all 18 airports. Foreign airport departure screening significantly decreased the false negative (infected/undetected) passengers. U.S. attack rates: no screening (26.9%–30.9%); screening (26.4%–30.6%); however airport screening results in 800 K–1.8 M less U.S. PI cases; 16 K–35 K less deaths (2% fatality rate). Antiviral medications for travel contact prophylaxis (10 contacts/PI passenger) were high – 8.8 M. False positives from all 18 airports: 100–200/day. CONCLUSIONS: Foreign shore exit screening greatly reduces numbers of PI infected passengers. U.S. airport screening identifies 50% infected individuals; efficacy is limited by the asymptomatic PI infected. Screening will not significantly delay arrival of PI via international air transport, but will reduce the rate of new US cases and subsequent deaths. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7185379 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71853792020-04-28 U.S. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: Modeling and analysis Malone, John D. Brigantic, Robert Muller, George A. Gadgil, Ashok Delp, Woody McMahon, Benjamin H. Lee, Russell Kulesz, Jim Mihelic, F. Matthew Travel Med Infect Dis Article BACKGROUND: A stochastic discrete event simulation model was developed to assess the effectiveness of passenger screening for Pandemic Influenza (PI) at U.S. airport foreign entry. METHODS: International passengers arriving at 18 U.S. airports from Asia, Europe, South America, and Canada were assigned to one of three states: not infected, infected with PI, infected with other respiratory illness. Passengers passed through layered screening then exited the model. 80% screening effectiveness was assumed for symptomatic passengers; 6% asymptomatic passengers. RESULTS: In the first 100 days of a global pandemic, U.S. airport screening would evaluate over 17 M passengers with 800 K secondary screenings. 11,570 PI infected passengers (majority asymptomatic) would enter the U.S. undetected from all 18 airports. Foreign airport departure screening significantly decreased the false negative (infected/undetected) passengers. U.S. attack rates: no screening (26.9%–30.9%); screening (26.4%–30.6%); however airport screening results in 800 K–1.8 M less U.S. PI cases; 16 K–35 K less deaths (2% fatality rate). Antiviral medications for travel contact prophylaxis (10 contacts/PI passenger) were high – 8.8 M. False positives from all 18 airports: 100–200/day. CONCLUSIONS: Foreign shore exit screening greatly reduces numbers of PI infected passengers. U.S. airport screening identifies 50% infected individuals; efficacy is limited by the asymptomatic PI infected. Screening will not significantly delay arrival of PI via international air transport, but will reduce the rate of new US cases and subsequent deaths. Elsevier Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2009-07 2009-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7185379/ /pubmed/19717097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2009.02.006 Text en Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Malone, John D. Brigantic, Robert Muller, George A. Gadgil, Ashok Delp, Woody McMahon, Benjamin H. Lee, Russell Kulesz, Jim Mihelic, F. Matthew U.S. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: Modeling and analysis |
title | U.S. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: Modeling and analysis |
title_full | U.S. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: Modeling and analysis |
title_fullStr | U.S. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: Modeling and analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | U.S. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: Modeling and analysis |
title_short | U.S. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: Modeling and analysis |
title_sort | u.s. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: modeling and analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7185379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19717097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2009.02.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malonejohnd usairportentryscreeninginresponsetopandemicinfluenzamodelingandanalysis AT briganticrobert usairportentryscreeninginresponsetopandemicinfluenzamodelingandanalysis AT mullergeorgea usairportentryscreeninginresponsetopandemicinfluenzamodelingandanalysis AT gadgilashok usairportentryscreeninginresponsetopandemicinfluenzamodelingandanalysis AT delpwoody usairportentryscreeninginresponsetopandemicinfluenzamodelingandanalysis AT mcmahonbenjaminh usairportentryscreeninginresponsetopandemicinfluenzamodelingandanalysis AT leerussell usairportentryscreeninginresponsetopandemicinfluenzamodelingandanalysis AT kuleszjim usairportentryscreeninginresponsetopandemicinfluenzamodelingandanalysis AT mihelicfmatthew usairportentryscreeninginresponsetopandemicinfluenzamodelingandanalysis |