Cargando…

U.S. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: Modeling and analysis

BACKGROUND: A stochastic discrete event simulation model was developed to assess the effectiveness of passenger screening for Pandemic Influenza (PI) at U.S. airport foreign entry. METHODS: International passengers arriving at 18 U.S. airports from Asia, Europe, South America, and Canada were assign...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malone, John D., Brigantic, Robert, Muller, George A., Gadgil, Ashok, Delp, Woody, McMahon, Benjamin H., Lee, Russell, Kulesz, Jim, Mihelic, F. Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7185379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19717097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2009.02.006
_version_ 1783526747785920512
author Malone, John D.
Brigantic, Robert
Muller, George A.
Gadgil, Ashok
Delp, Woody
McMahon, Benjamin H.
Lee, Russell
Kulesz, Jim
Mihelic, F. Matthew
author_facet Malone, John D.
Brigantic, Robert
Muller, George A.
Gadgil, Ashok
Delp, Woody
McMahon, Benjamin H.
Lee, Russell
Kulesz, Jim
Mihelic, F. Matthew
author_sort Malone, John D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A stochastic discrete event simulation model was developed to assess the effectiveness of passenger screening for Pandemic Influenza (PI) at U.S. airport foreign entry. METHODS: International passengers arriving at 18 U.S. airports from Asia, Europe, South America, and Canada were assigned to one of three states: not infected, infected with PI, infected with other respiratory illness. Passengers passed through layered screening then exited the model. 80% screening effectiveness was assumed for symptomatic passengers; 6% asymptomatic passengers. RESULTS: In the first 100 days of a global pandemic, U.S. airport screening would evaluate over 17 M passengers with 800 K secondary screenings. 11,570 PI infected passengers (majority asymptomatic) would enter the U.S. undetected from all 18 airports. Foreign airport departure screening significantly decreased the false negative (infected/undetected) passengers. U.S. attack rates: no screening (26.9%–30.9%); screening (26.4%–30.6%); however airport screening results in 800 K–1.8 M less U.S. PI cases; 16 K–35 K less deaths (2% fatality rate). Antiviral medications for travel contact prophylaxis (10 contacts/PI passenger) were high – 8.8 M. False positives from all 18 airports: 100–200/day. CONCLUSIONS: Foreign shore exit screening greatly reduces numbers of PI infected passengers. U.S. airport screening identifies 50% infected individuals; efficacy is limited by the asymptomatic PI infected. Screening will not significantly delay arrival of PI via international air transport, but will reduce the rate of new US cases and subsequent deaths.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7185379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Elsevier Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71853792020-04-28 U.S. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: Modeling and analysis Malone, John D. Brigantic, Robert Muller, George A. Gadgil, Ashok Delp, Woody McMahon, Benjamin H. Lee, Russell Kulesz, Jim Mihelic, F. Matthew Travel Med Infect Dis Article BACKGROUND: A stochastic discrete event simulation model was developed to assess the effectiveness of passenger screening for Pandemic Influenza (PI) at U.S. airport foreign entry. METHODS: International passengers arriving at 18 U.S. airports from Asia, Europe, South America, and Canada were assigned to one of three states: not infected, infected with PI, infected with other respiratory illness. Passengers passed through layered screening then exited the model. 80% screening effectiveness was assumed for symptomatic passengers; 6% asymptomatic passengers. RESULTS: In the first 100 days of a global pandemic, U.S. airport screening would evaluate over 17 M passengers with 800 K secondary screenings. 11,570 PI infected passengers (majority asymptomatic) would enter the U.S. undetected from all 18 airports. Foreign airport departure screening significantly decreased the false negative (infected/undetected) passengers. U.S. attack rates: no screening (26.9%–30.9%); screening (26.4%–30.6%); however airport screening results in 800 K–1.8 M less U.S. PI cases; 16 K–35 K less deaths (2% fatality rate). Antiviral medications for travel contact prophylaxis (10 contacts/PI passenger) were high – 8.8 M. False positives from all 18 airports: 100–200/day. CONCLUSIONS: Foreign shore exit screening greatly reduces numbers of PI infected passengers. U.S. airport screening identifies 50% infected individuals; efficacy is limited by the asymptomatic PI infected. Screening will not significantly delay arrival of PI via international air transport, but will reduce the rate of new US cases and subsequent deaths. Elsevier Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2009-07 2009-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7185379/ /pubmed/19717097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2009.02.006 Text en Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Malone, John D.
Brigantic, Robert
Muller, George A.
Gadgil, Ashok
Delp, Woody
McMahon, Benjamin H.
Lee, Russell
Kulesz, Jim
Mihelic, F. Matthew
U.S. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: Modeling and analysis
title U.S. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: Modeling and analysis
title_full U.S. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: Modeling and analysis
title_fullStr U.S. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: Modeling and analysis
title_full_unstemmed U.S. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: Modeling and analysis
title_short U.S. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: Modeling and analysis
title_sort u.s. airport entry screening in response to pandemic influenza: modeling and analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7185379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19717097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2009.02.006
work_keys_str_mv AT malonejohnd usairportentryscreeninginresponsetopandemicinfluenzamodelingandanalysis
AT briganticrobert usairportentryscreeninginresponsetopandemicinfluenzamodelingandanalysis
AT mullergeorgea usairportentryscreeninginresponsetopandemicinfluenzamodelingandanalysis
AT gadgilashok usairportentryscreeninginresponsetopandemicinfluenzamodelingandanalysis
AT delpwoody usairportentryscreeninginresponsetopandemicinfluenzamodelingandanalysis
AT mcmahonbenjaminh usairportentryscreeninginresponsetopandemicinfluenzamodelingandanalysis
AT leerussell usairportentryscreeninginresponsetopandemicinfluenzamodelingandanalysis
AT kuleszjim usairportentryscreeninginresponsetopandemicinfluenzamodelingandanalysis
AT mihelicfmatthew usairportentryscreeninginresponsetopandemicinfluenzamodelingandanalysis