Cargando…
DNA priming and influenza vaccine immunogenicity: two phase 1 open label randomised clinical trials
BACKGROUND: Because the general population is largely naive to H5N1 influenza, antibodies generated to H5 allow analysis of novel influenza vaccines independent of background immunity from previous infection. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of DNA encoding H5 as a priming vaccine to improv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7185472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21975270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70240-7 |
_version_ | 1783526764396412928 |
---|---|
author | Ledgerwood, Julie E Wei, Chih-Jen Hu, Zonghui Gordon, Ingelise J Enama, Mary E Hendel, Cynthia S McTamney, Patrick M Pearce, Melissa B Yassine, Hadi M Boyington, Jeffrey C Bailer, Robert Tumpey, Terrence M Koup, Richard A Mascola, John R Nabel, Gary J Graham, Barney S |
author_facet | Ledgerwood, Julie E Wei, Chih-Jen Hu, Zonghui Gordon, Ingelise J Enama, Mary E Hendel, Cynthia S McTamney, Patrick M Pearce, Melissa B Yassine, Hadi M Boyington, Jeffrey C Bailer, Robert Tumpey, Terrence M Koup, Richard A Mascola, John R Nabel, Gary J Graham, Barney S |
author_sort | Ledgerwood, Julie E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Because the general population is largely naive to H5N1 influenza, antibodies generated to H5 allow analysis of novel influenza vaccines independent of background immunity from previous infection. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of DNA encoding H5 as a priming vaccine to improve antibody responses to inactivated influenza vaccination. METHODS: In VRC 306 and VRC 310, two sequentially enrolled phase 1, open-label, randomised clinical trials, healthy adults (age 18–60 years) were randomly assigned to receive intramuscular H5 DNA (4 mg) at day 0 or twice, at day 0 and week 4, followed by H5N1 monovalent inactivated vaccine (MIV; 90 μg) at 4 or 24 weeks, and compared with a two-dose regimen of H5N1 MIV with either a 4 or 24 week interval. Antibody responses were assessed by haemagglutination inhibition (HAI), ELISA, neutralisation (ID(80)), and immunoassays for stem-directed antibodies. T cell responses were assessed by intracellular cytokine staining. After enrolment, investigators and individuals were not masked to group assignment. VRC 306 and VRC 310 are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00776711 and NCT01086657, respectively. FINDINGS: In VRC 306, 60 individuals were randomly assigned to the four groups (15 in each) and 59 received the vaccinations. In VRC 310, of the 21 individuals enrolled, 20 received the vaccinations (nine received a two-dose regimen of H5N1 MIV and 11 received H5 DNA at day 0 followed by H5N1 MIV at week 24). H5 DNA priming was safe and enhanced H5-specific antibody titres following an H5N1 MIV boost, especially when the interval between DNA prime and MIV boost was extended to 24 weeks. In the two studies, DNA priming with a 24-week MIV boost interval induced protective HAI titres in 21 (81%) of 26 of individuals, with an increase in geometric mean titre (GMT) of more than four times that of individuals given the MIV-MIV regimen at 4 or 24 weeks (GMT 103–206 vs GMT 27–33). Additionally, neutralising antibodies directed to the conserved stem region of H5 were induced by this prime-boost regimen in several individuals. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were recorded. INTERPRETATION: DNA priming 24 weeks in advance of influenza vaccine boosting increased the magnitude of protective antibody responses (HAI) and in some cases induced haemagglutinin-stem-specific neutralising antibodies. A DNA-MIV vaccine regimen could enhance the efficacy of H5 or other influenza vaccines and shows that anti-stem antibodies can be elicited by vaccination in man. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7185472 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71854722020-04-28 DNA priming and influenza vaccine immunogenicity: two phase 1 open label randomised clinical trials Ledgerwood, Julie E Wei, Chih-Jen Hu, Zonghui Gordon, Ingelise J Enama, Mary E Hendel, Cynthia S McTamney, Patrick M Pearce, Melissa B Yassine, Hadi M Boyington, Jeffrey C Bailer, Robert Tumpey, Terrence M Koup, Richard A Mascola, John R Nabel, Gary J Graham, Barney S Lancet Infect Dis Articles BACKGROUND: Because the general population is largely naive to H5N1 influenza, antibodies generated to H5 allow analysis of novel influenza vaccines independent of background immunity from previous infection. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of DNA encoding H5 as a priming vaccine to improve antibody responses to inactivated influenza vaccination. METHODS: In VRC 306 and VRC 310, two sequentially enrolled phase 1, open-label, randomised clinical trials, healthy adults (age 18–60 years) were randomly assigned to receive intramuscular H5 DNA (4 mg) at day 0 or twice, at day 0 and week 4, followed by H5N1 monovalent inactivated vaccine (MIV; 90 μg) at 4 or 24 weeks, and compared with a two-dose regimen of H5N1 MIV with either a 4 or 24 week interval. Antibody responses were assessed by haemagglutination inhibition (HAI), ELISA, neutralisation (ID(80)), and immunoassays for stem-directed antibodies. T cell responses were assessed by intracellular cytokine staining. After enrolment, investigators and individuals were not masked to group assignment. VRC 306 and VRC 310 are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00776711 and NCT01086657, respectively. FINDINGS: In VRC 306, 60 individuals were randomly assigned to the four groups (15 in each) and 59 received the vaccinations. In VRC 310, of the 21 individuals enrolled, 20 received the vaccinations (nine received a two-dose regimen of H5N1 MIV and 11 received H5 DNA at day 0 followed by H5N1 MIV at week 24). H5 DNA priming was safe and enhanced H5-specific antibody titres following an H5N1 MIV boost, especially when the interval between DNA prime and MIV boost was extended to 24 weeks. In the two studies, DNA priming with a 24-week MIV boost interval induced protective HAI titres in 21 (81%) of 26 of individuals, with an increase in geometric mean titre (GMT) of more than four times that of individuals given the MIV-MIV regimen at 4 or 24 weeks (GMT 103–206 vs GMT 27–33). Additionally, neutralising antibodies directed to the conserved stem region of H5 were induced by this prime-boost regimen in several individuals. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were recorded. INTERPRETATION: DNA priming 24 weeks in advance of influenza vaccine boosting increased the magnitude of protective antibody responses (HAI) and in some cases induced haemagglutinin-stem-specific neutralising antibodies. A DNA-MIV vaccine regimen could enhance the efficacy of H5 or other influenza vaccines and shows that anti-stem antibodies can be elicited by vaccination in man. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health. Elsevier Ltd. 2011-12 2011-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7185472/ /pubmed/21975270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70240-7 Text en Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Articles Ledgerwood, Julie E Wei, Chih-Jen Hu, Zonghui Gordon, Ingelise J Enama, Mary E Hendel, Cynthia S McTamney, Patrick M Pearce, Melissa B Yassine, Hadi M Boyington, Jeffrey C Bailer, Robert Tumpey, Terrence M Koup, Richard A Mascola, John R Nabel, Gary J Graham, Barney S DNA priming and influenza vaccine immunogenicity: two phase 1 open label randomised clinical trials |
title | DNA priming and influenza vaccine immunogenicity: two phase 1 open label randomised clinical trials |
title_full | DNA priming and influenza vaccine immunogenicity: two phase 1 open label randomised clinical trials |
title_fullStr | DNA priming and influenza vaccine immunogenicity: two phase 1 open label randomised clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | DNA priming and influenza vaccine immunogenicity: two phase 1 open label randomised clinical trials |
title_short | DNA priming and influenza vaccine immunogenicity: two phase 1 open label randomised clinical trials |
title_sort | dna priming and influenza vaccine immunogenicity: two phase 1 open label randomised clinical trials |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7185472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21975270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70240-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ledgerwoodjuliee dnaprimingandinfluenzavaccineimmunogenicitytwophase1openlabelrandomisedclinicaltrials AT weichihjen dnaprimingandinfluenzavaccineimmunogenicitytwophase1openlabelrandomisedclinicaltrials AT huzonghui dnaprimingandinfluenzavaccineimmunogenicitytwophase1openlabelrandomisedclinicaltrials AT gordoningelisej dnaprimingandinfluenzavaccineimmunogenicitytwophase1openlabelrandomisedclinicaltrials AT enamamarye dnaprimingandinfluenzavaccineimmunogenicitytwophase1openlabelrandomisedclinicaltrials AT hendelcynthias dnaprimingandinfluenzavaccineimmunogenicitytwophase1openlabelrandomisedclinicaltrials AT mctamneypatrickm dnaprimingandinfluenzavaccineimmunogenicitytwophase1openlabelrandomisedclinicaltrials AT pearcemelissab dnaprimingandinfluenzavaccineimmunogenicitytwophase1openlabelrandomisedclinicaltrials AT yassinehadim dnaprimingandinfluenzavaccineimmunogenicitytwophase1openlabelrandomisedclinicaltrials AT boyingtonjeffreyc dnaprimingandinfluenzavaccineimmunogenicitytwophase1openlabelrandomisedclinicaltrials AT bailerrobert dnaprimingandinfluenzavaccineimmunogenicitytwophase1openlabelrandomisedclinicaltrials AT tumpeyterrencem dnaprimingandinfluenzavaccineimmunogenicitytwophase1openlabelrandomisedclinicaltrials AT koupricharda dnaprimingandinfluenzavaccineimmunogenicitytwophase1openlabelrandomisedclinicaltrials AT mascolajohnr dnaprimingandinfluenzavaccineimmunogenicitytwophase1openlabelrandomisedclinicaltrials AT nabelgaryj dnaprimingandinfluenzavaccineimmunogenicitytwophase1openlabelrandomisedclinicaltrials AT grahambarneys dnaprimingandinfluenzavaccineimmunogenicitytwophase1openlabelrandomisedclinicaltrials AT dnaprimingandinfluenzavaccineimmunogenicitytwophase1openlabelrandomisedclinicaltrials |