Cargando…

Evaluation of newborn hearing screening program

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Newborn Hearing Screening Program of Hospital Regional de Sobradinho, from January 2016 to December 2017, according to Multiprofessional Committee on Auditory Health parameters and Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) recommendations, as well as to describe the prevalence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marinho, Ana Carolina Alves, Pereira, Edirlene Cordeiro de Souza, Torres, Kleyse Kerlyne Costa, Miranda, Andreza Monforte, Ledesma, Alleluia Lima Losno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7185987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32374803
http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001643
_version_ 1783526865428807680
author Marinho, Ana Carolina Alves
Pereira, Edirlene Cordeiro de Souza
Torres, Kleyse Kerlyne Costa
Miranda, Andreza Monforte
Ledesma, Alleluia Lima Losno
author_facet Marinho, Ana Carolina Alves
Pereira, Edirlene Cordeiro de Souza
Torres, Kleyse Kerlyne Costa
Miranda, Andreza Monforte
Ledesma, Alleluia Lima Losno
author_sort Marinho, Ana Carolina Alves
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Newborn Hearing Screening Program of Hospital Regional de Sobradinho, from January 2016 to December 2017, according to Multiprofessional Committee on Auditory Health parameters and Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) recommendations, as well as to describe the prevalence of risk factors for hearing loss within the study population and their impact on the respective program. METHOD: This is a quantitative, cross-sectional and retrospective study that carefully analyzed registration books of screened newborns. It was established the prevalence of “pass” and “fail” in test and retest, retest percentage of attendance and referral for audiological diagnosis. Risk factors for hearing loss were described, as well as their influence on “pass” and “fail” rates. Inferential statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test and Anderson-Darling test, with 5% reliability index. RESULTS: A total of 3,981 newborns were screened; 2,963 (74.4%) presented no risk factors whereas 1,018 (25.6%) did, prematurity being the most frequent (51.6%). In the test, 166 (4.2%) failed and 118 (71.1%) attended the retest. The referral rate for diagnosis was 0.3%. CONCLUSION: Regarding the percentage of referral for diagnosis, the program reached indexes recommended by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing and Multiprofessional Committee on Auditory Health. The most prevalent risk factor within the population was prematurity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7185987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71859872020-05-04 Evaluation of newborn hearing screening program Marinho, Ana Carolina Alves Pereira, Edirlene Cordeiro de Souza Torres, Kleyse Kerlyne Costa Miranda, Andreza Monforte Ledesma, Alleluia Lima Losno Rev Saude Publica Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Newborn Hearing Screening Program of Hospital Regional de Sobradinho, from January 2016 to December 2017, according to Multiprofessional Committee on Auditory Health parameters and Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) recommendations, as well as to describe the prevalence of risk factors for hearing loss within the study population and their impact on the respective program. METHOD: This is a quantitative, cross-sectional and retrospective study that carefully analyzed registration books of screened newborns. It was established the prevalence of “pass” and “fail” in test and retest, retest percentage of attendance and referral for audiological diagnosis. Risk factors for hearing loss were described, as well as their influence on “pass” and “fail” rates. Inferential statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test and Anderson-Darling test, with 5% reliability index. RESULTS: A total of 3,981 newborns were screened; 2,963 (74.4%) presented no risk factors whereas 1,018 (25.6%) did, prematurity being the most frequent (51.6%). In the test, 166 (4.2%) failed and 118 (71.1%) attended the retest. The referral rate for diagnosis was 0.3%. CONCLUSION: Regarding the percentage of referral for diagnosis, the program reached indexes recommended by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing and Multiprofessional Committee on Auditory Health. The most prevalent risk factor within the population was prematurity. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2020-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7185987/ /pubmed/32374803 http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001643 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Marinho, Ana Carolina Alves
Pereira, Edirlene Cordeiro de Souza
Torres, Kleyse Kerlyne Costa
Miranda, Andreza Monforte
Ledesma, Alleluia Lima Losno
Evaluation of newborn hearing screening program
title Evaluation of newborn hearing screening program
title_full Evaluation of newborn hearing screening program
title_fullStr Evaluation of newborn hearing screening program
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of newborn hearing screening program
title_short Evaluation of newborn hearing screening program
title_sort evaluation of newborn hearing screening program
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7185987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32374803
http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001643
work_keys_str_mv AT marinhoanacarolinaalves evaluationofnewbornhearingscreeningprogram
AT pereiraedirlenecordeirodesouza evaluationofnewbornhearingscreeningprogram
AT torreskleysekerlynecosta evaluationofnewbornhearingscreeningprogram
AT mirandaandrezamonforte evaluationofnewbornhearingscreeningprogram
AT ledesmaalleluialimalosno evaluationofnewbornhearingscreeningprogram