Cargando…
Clinical practice of language fMRI in epilepsy centers: a European survey and conclusions by the ESNR Epilepsy Working Group
PURPOSE: To assess current clinical practices throughout Europe with respect to acquisition, implementation, evaluation, and interpretation of language functional MRI (fMRI) in epilepsy patients. METHODS: An online survey was emailed to all European Society of Neuroradiology members (n = 1662), know...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7186249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32170372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02397-w |
_version_ | 1783526907712634880 |
---|---|
author | Bargalló, N. Cano-López, I. Rosazza, C. Vernooij, M. W. Smits, M. Vitali, P. Alvarez-Linera, J. Urbach, H. Mancini, L. Ramos, A. Yousry, T. |
author_facet | Bargalló, N. Cano-López, I. Rosazza, C. Vernooij, M. W. Smits, M. Vitali, P. Alvarez-Linera, J. Urbach, H. Mancini, L. Ramos, A. Yousry, T. |
author_sort | Bargalló, N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess current clinical practices throughout Europe with respect to acquisition, implementation, evaluation, and interpretation of language functional MRI (fMRI) in epilepsy patients. METHODS: An online survey was emailed to all European Society of Neuroradiology members (n = 1662), known associates (n = 6400), and 64 members of European Epilepsy network. The questionnaire featured 40 individual items on demographic data, clinical practice and indications, fMRI paradigms, radiological workflow, data post-processing protocol, and reporting. RESULTS: A total of 49 non-duplicate entries from European centers were received from 20 countries. Of these, 73.5% were board-certified neuroradiologists and 69.4% had an in-house epilepsy surgery program. Seventy-one percent of centers performed fewer than five scans per month for epilepsy. The most frequently used paradigms were phonemic verbal fluency (47.7%) and auditory comprehension (55.6%), but variants of 13 paradigms were described. Most centers assessed the fMRI task performance (75.5%), ensured cognitive-task adjustment (77.6%), trained the patient before scanning (85.7%), and assessed handedness (77.6%), but only 28.6% had special paradigms for patients with cognitive impairments. fMRI was post-processed mainly by neuroradiologists (42.1%), using open-source software (55.0%). Reporting was done primarily by neuroradiologists (74.2%). Interpretation was done mainly by visual inspection (65.3%). Most specialists (81.6%) were able to determine the hemisphere dominance for language in more than 75% of exams, attributing failure to the patient not performing the task correctly. CONCLUSION: This survey shows that language fMRI is firmly embedded in the preoperative management of epilepsy patients. The wide variety of paradigms and the use of non-CE-marked software underline the need for establishing reference standards. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00234-020-02397-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7186249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71862492020-04-30 Clinical practice of language fMRI in epilepsy centers: a European survey and conclusions by the ESNR Epilepsy Working Group Bargalló, N. Cano-López, I. Rosazza, C. Vernooij, M. W. Smits, M. Vitali, P. Alvarez-Linera, J. Urbach, H. Mancini, L. Ramos, A. Yousry, T. Neuroradiology Guidelines PURPOSE: To assess current clinical practices throughout Europe with respect to acquisition, implementation, evaluation, and interpretation of language functional MRI (fMRI) in epilepsy patients. METHODS: An online survey was emailed to all European Society of Neuroradiology members (n = 1662), known associates (n = 6400), and 64 members of European Epilepsy network. The questionnaire featured 40 individual items on demographic data, clinical practice and indications, fMRI paradigms, radiological workflow, data post-processing protocol, and reporting. RESULTS: A total of 49 non-duplicate entries from European centers were received from 20 countries. Of these, 73.5% were board-certified neuroradiologists and 69.4% had an in-house epilepsy surgery program. Seventy-one percent of centers performed fewer than five scans per month for epilepsy. The most frequently used paradigms were phonemic verbal fluency (47.7%) and auditory comprehension (55.6%), but variants of 13 paradigms were described. Most centers assessed the fMRI task performance (75.5%), ensured cognitive-task adjustment (77.6%), trained the patient before scanning (85.7%), and assessed handedness (77.6%), but only 28.6% had special paradigms for patients with cognitive impairments. fMRI was post-processed mainly by neuroradiologists (42.1%), using open-source software (55.0%). Reporting was done primarily by neuroradiologists (74.2%). Interpretation was done mainly by visual inspection (65.3%). Most specialists (81.6%) were able to determine the hemisphere dominance for language in more than 75% of exams, attributing failure to the patient not performing the task correctly. CONCLUSION: This survey shows that language fMRI is firmly embedded in the preoperative management of epilepsy patients. The wide variety of paradigms and the use of non-CE-marked software underline the need for establishing reference standards. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00234-020-02397-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-03-13 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7186249/ /pubmed/32170372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02397-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Guidelines Bargalló, N. Cano-López, I. Rosazza, C. Vernooij, M. W. Smits, M. Vitali, P. Alvarez-Linera, J. Urbach, H. Mancini, L. Ramos, A. Yousry, T. Clinical practice of language fMRI in epilepsy centers: a European survey and conclusions by the ESNR Epilepsy Working Group |
title | Clinical practice of language fMRI in epilepsy centers: a European survey and conclusions by the ESNR Epilepsy Working Group |
title_full | Clinical practice of language fMRI in epilepsy centers: a European survey and conclusions by the ESNR Epilepsy Working Group |
title_fullStr | Clinical practice of language fMRI in epilepsy centers: a European survey and conclusions by the ESNR Epilepsy Working Group |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical practice of language fMRI in epilepsy centers: a European survey and conclusions by the ESNR Epilepsy Working Group |
title_short | Clinical practice of language fMRI in epilepsy centers: a European survey and conclusions by the ESNR Epilepsy Working Group |
title_sort | clinical practice of language fmri in epilepsy centers: a european survey and conclusions by the esnr epilepsy working group |
topic | Guidelines |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7186249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32170372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02397-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bargallon clinicalpracticeoflanguagefmriinepilepsycentersaeuropeansurveyandconclusionsbytheesnrepilepsyworkinggroup AT canolopezi clinicalpracticeoflanguagefmriinepilepsycentersaeuropeansurveyandconclusionsbytheesnrepilepsyworkinggroup AT rosazzac clinicalpracticeoflanguagefmriinepilepsycentersaeuropeansurveyandconclusionsbytheesnrepilepsyworkinggroup AT vernooijmw clinicalpracticeoflanguagefmriinepilepsycentersaeuropeansurveyandconclusionsbytheesnrepilepsyworkinggroup AT smitsm clinicalpracticeoflanguagefmriinepilepsycentersaeuropeansurveyandconclusionsbytheesnrepilepsyworkinggroup AT vitalip clinicalpracticeoflanguagefmriinepilepsycentersaeuropeansurveyandconclusionsbytheesnrepilepsyworkinggroup AT alvarezlineraj clinicalpracticeoflanguagefmriinepilepsycentersaeuropeansurveyandconclusionsbytheesnrepilepsyworkinggroup AT urbachh clinicalpracticeoflanguagefmriinepilepsycentersaeuropeansurveyandconclusionsbytheesnrepilepsyworkinggroup AT mancinil clinicalpracticeoflanguagefmriinepilepsycentersaeuropeansurveyandconclusionsbytheesnrepilepsyworkinggroup AT ramosa clinicalpracticeoflanguagefmriinepilepsycentersaeuropeansurveyandconclusionsbytheesnrepilepsyworkinggroup AT yousryt clinicalpracticeoflanguagefmriinepilepsycentersaeuropeansurveyandconclusionsbytheesnrepilepsyworkinggroup |