Cargando…
Psychometric network models from time-series and panel data
Researchers in the field of network psychometrics often focus on the estimation of Gaussian graphical models (GGMs)—an undirected network model of partial correlations—between observed variables of cross-sectional data or single-subject time-series data. This assumes that all variables are measured...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7186258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32162233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-020-09697-3 |
_version_ | 1783526910002724864 |
---|---|
author | Epskamp, Sacha |
author_facet | Epskamp, Sacha |
author_sort | Epskamp, Sacha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Researchers in the field of network psychometrics often focus on the estimation of Gaussian graphical models (GGMs)—an undirected network model of partial correlations—between observed variables of cross-sectional data or single-subject time-series data. This assumes that all variables are measured without measurement error, which may be implausible. In addition, cross-sectional data cannot distinguish between within-subject and between-subject effects. This paper provides a general framework that extends GGM modeling with latent variables, including relationships over time. These relationships can be estimated from time-series data or panel data featuring at least three waves of measurement. The model takes the form of a graphical vector-autoregression model between latent variables and is termed the ts-lvgvar when estimated from time-series data and the panel-lvgvar when estimated from panel data. These methods have been implemented in the software package psychonetrics, which is exemplified in two empirical examples, one using time-series data and one using panel data, and evaluated in two large-scale simulation studies. The paper concludes with a discussion on ergodicity and generalizability. Although within-subject effects may in principle be separated from between-subject effects, the interpretation of these results rests on the intensity and the time interval of measurement and on the plausibility of the assumption of stationarity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7186258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71862582020-04-30 Psychometric network models from time-series and panel data Epskamp, Sacha Psychometrika Theory and Methods Researchers in the field of network psychometrics often focus on the estimation of Gaussian graphical models (GGMs)—an undirected network model of partial correlations—between observed variables of cross-sectional data or single-subject time-series data. This assumes that all variables are measured without measurement error, which may be implausible. In addition, cross-sectional data cannot distinguish between within-subject and between-subject effects. This paper provides a general framework that extends GGM modeling with latent variables, including relationships over time. These relationships can be estimated from time-series data or panel data featuring at least three waves of measurement. The model takes the form of a graphical vector-autoregression model between latent variables and is termed the ts-lvgvar when estimated from time-series data and the panel-lvgvar when estimated from panel data. These methods have been implemented in the software package psychonetrics, which is exemplified in two empirical examples, one using time-series data and one using panel data, and evaluated in two large-scale simulation studies. The paper concludes with a discussion on ergodicity and generalizability. Although within-subject effects may in principle be separated from between-subject effects, the interpretation of these results rests on the intensity and the time interval of measurement and on the plausibility of the assumption of stationarity. Springer US 2020-03-11 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7186258/ /pubmed/32162233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-020-09697-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Theory and Methods Epskamp, Sacha Psychometric network models from time-series and panel data |
title | Psychometric network models from time-series and panel data |
title_full | Psychometric network models from time-series and panel data |
title_fullStr | Psychometric network models from time-series and panel data |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometric network models from time-series and panel data |
title_short | Psychometric network models from time-series and panel data |
title_sort | psychometric network models from time-series and panel data |
topic | Theory and Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7186258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32162233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-020-09697-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT epskampsacha psychometricnetworkmodelsfromtimeseriesandpaneldata |