Cargando…
A Combined Geometric Morphometric and Discrete Element Modeling Approach for Hip Cartilage Contact Mechanics
Finite element analysis (FEA) provides the current reference standard for numerical simulation of hip cartilage contact mechanics. Unfortunately, the development of subject-specific FEA models is a laborious process. Owed to its simplicity, Discrete Element Analysis (DEA) provides an attractive alte...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7186355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32373602 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00318 |
_version_ | 1783526929694982144 |
---|---|
author | Van Houcke, Jan Audenaert, Emmanuel A. Atkins, Penny R. Anderson, Andrew E. |
author_facet | Van Houcke, Jan Audenaert, Emmanuel A. Atkins, Penny R. Anderson, Andrew E. |
author_sort | Van Houcke, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Finite element analysis (FEA) provides the current reference standard for numerical simulation of hip cartilage contact mechanics. Unfortunately, the development of subject-specific FEA models is a laborious process. Owed to its simplicity, Discrete Element Analysis (DEA) provides an attractive alternative to FEA. Advancements in computational morphometrics, specifically statistical shape modeling (SSM), provide the opportunity to predict cartilage anatomy without image segmentation, which could be integrated with DEA to provide an efficient platform to predict cartilage contact stresses in large populations. The objective of this study was, first, to validate linear and non-linear DEA against a previously validated FEA model and, second, to present and evaluate the applicability of a novel population-averaged cartilage geometry prediction method against previously used methods to estimate cartilage anatomy. The population-averaged method is based on average cartilage thickness maps and therefore allows for a more accurate and individualized cartilage geometry estimation when combined with SSM. The root mean squared error of the population-averaged cartilage geometry predicted by SSM as compared to the manually segmented cartilage geometry was 0.31 ± 0.08 mm. Identical boundary and loading conditions were applied to the DEA and FEA models. Predicted DEA stress distribution patterns and magnitude of peak stresses were in better agreement with FEA for the novel cartilage anatomy prediction method as compared to commonly used parametric methods based on the estimation of acetabular and femoral head radius. Still, contact stress was overestimated and contact area was underestimated for all cartilage anatomy prediction methods. Linear and non-linear DEA methods differed mainly in peak stress results with the non-linear definition being more sensitive to detection of high peak stresses. In conclusion, DEA in combination with the novel population-averaged cartilage anatomy prediction method provided accurate predictions while offering an efficient platform to conduct population-wide analyses of hip contact mechanics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7186355 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71863552020-05-05 A Combined Geometric Morphometric and Discrete Element Modeling Approach for Hip Cartilage Contact Mechanics Van Houcke, Jan Audenaert, Emmanuel A. Atkins, Penny R. Anderson, Andrew E. Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Finite element analysis (FEA) provides the current reference standard for numerical simulation of hip cartilage contact mechanics. Unfortunately, the development of subject-specific FEA models is a laborious process. Owed to its simplicity, Discrete Element Analysis (DEA) provides an attractive alternative to FEA. Advancements in computational morphometrics, specifically statistical shape modeling (SSM), provide the opportunity to predict cartilage anatomy without image segmentation, which could be integrated with DEA to provide an efficient platform to predict cartilage contact stresses in large populations. The objective of this study was, first, to validate linear and non-linear DEA against a previously validated FEA model and, second, to present and evaluate the applicability of a novel population-averaged cartilage geometry prediction method against previously used methods to estimate cartilage anatomy. The population-averaged method is based on average cartilage thickness maps and therefore allows for a more accurate and individualized cartilage geometry estimation when combined with SSM. The root mean squared error of the population-averaged cartilage geometry predicted by SSM as compared to the manually segmented cartilage geometry was 0.31 ± 0.08 mm. Identical boundary and loading conditions were applied to the DEA and FEA models. Predicted DEA stress distribution patterns and magnitude of peak stresses were in better agreement with FEA for the novel cartilage anatomy prediction method as compared to commonly used parametric methods based on the estimation of acetabular and femoral head radius. Still, contact stress was overestimated and contact area was underestimated for all cartilage anatomy prediction methods. Linear and non-linear DEA methods differed mainly in peak stress results with the non-linear definition being more sensitive to detection of high peak stresses. In conclusion, DEA in combination with the novel population-averaged cartilage anatomy prediction method provided accurate predictions while offering an efficient platform to conduct population-wide analyses of hip contact mechanics. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7186355/ /pubmed/32373602 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00318 Text en Copyright © 2020 Van Houcke, Audenaert, Atkins and Anderson. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Van Houcke, Jan Audenaert, Emmanuel A. Atkins, Penny R. Anderson, Andrew E. A Combined Geometric Morphometric and Discrete Element Modeling Approach for Hip Cartilage Contact Mechanics |
title | A Combined Geometric Morphometric and Discrete Element Modeling Approach for Hip Cartilage Contact Mechanics |
title_full | A Combined Geometric Morphometric and Discrete Element Modeling Approach for Hip Cartilage Contact Mechanics |
title_fullStr | A Combined Geometric Morphometric and Discrete Element Modeling Approach for Hip Cartilage Contact Mechanics |
title_full_unstemmed | A Combined Geometric Morphometric and Discrete Element Modeling Approach for Hip Cartilage Contact Mechanics |
title_short | A Combined Geometric Morphometric and Discrete Element Modeling Approach for Hip Cartilage Contact Mechanics |
title_sort | combined geometric morphometric and discrete element modeling approach for hip cartilage contact mechanics |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7186355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32373602 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00318 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanhouckejan acombinedgeometricmorphometricanddiscreteelementmodelingapproachforhipcartilagecontactmechanics AT audenaertemmanuela acombinedgeometricmorphometricanddiscreteelementmodelingapproachforhipcartilagecontactmechanics AT atkinspennyr acombinedgeometricmorphometricanddiscreteelementmodelingapproachforhipcartilagecontactmechanics AT andersonandrewe acombinedgeometricmorphometricanddiscreteelementmodelingapproachforhipcartilagecontactmechanics AT vanhouckejan combinedgeometricmorphometricanddiscreteelementmodelingapproachforhipcartilagecontactmechanics AT audenaertemmanuela combinedgeometricmorphometricanddiscreteelementmodelingapproachforhipcartilagecontactmechanics AT atkinspennyr combinedgeometricmorphometricanddiscreteelementmodelingapproachforhipcartilagecontactmechanics AT andersonandrewe combinedgeometricmorphometricanddiscreteelementmodelingapproachforhipcartilagecontactmechanics |