Cargando…

Botanical microbiomes on the cheap: Inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi

High‐throughput sequencing technologies have revolutionized the study of plant‐associated microbial populations, but they are relatively expensive. Molecular fingerprinting techniques are more affordable, yet yield considerably less information about the microbial community. Does this mean they are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnston‐Monje, David, Lopez Mejia, Jessica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7186905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32351795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11334
_version_ 1783527057047683072
author Johnston‐Monje, David
Lopez Mejia, Jessica
author_facet Johnston‐Monje, David
Lopez Mejia, Jessica
author_sort Johnston‐Monje, David
collection PubMed
description High‐throughput sequencing technologies have revolutionized the study of plant‐associated microbial populations, but they are relatively expensive. Molecular fingerprinting techniques are more affordable, yet yield considerably less information about the microbial community. Does this mean they are no longer useful for plant microbiome research? In this paper, we review the past 10 years of studies on plant‐associated microbiomes using molecular fingerprinting methodologies, including single‐strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), amplicon length heterogeneity PCR (LH‐PCR), ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (RISA) and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA), and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP). We also present data juxtaposing results from TRFLP methods with those generated using Illumina sequencing in the comparison of rhizobacterial populations of Brazilian maize and fungal surveys in Canadian tomato roots. In both cases, the TRFLP approach yielded the desired results at a level of resolution comparable to that of the MiSeq method, but at a fraction of the cost. Community fingerprinting methods (especially TRFLP) remain relevant for the identification of dominant microbes in a population, the observation of shifts in plant microbiome community diversity, and for screening samples before their use in more sensitive and expensive approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7186905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71869052020-04-29 Botanical microbiomes on the cheap: Inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi Johnston‐Monje, David Lopez Mejia, Jessica Appl Plant Sci Review Article High‐throughput sequencing technologies have revolutionized the study of plant‐associated microbial populations, but they are relatively expensive. Molecular fingerprinting techniques are more affordable, yet yield considerably less information about the microbial community. Does this mean they are no longer useful for plant microbiome research? In this paper, we review the past 10 years of studies on plant‐associated microbiomes using molecular fingerprinting methodologies, including single‐strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), amplicon length heterogeneity PCR (LH‐PCR), ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (RISA) and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA), and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP). We also present data juxtaposing results from TRFLP methods with those generated using Illumina sequencing in the comparison of rhizobacterial populations of Brazilian maize and fungal surveys in Canadian tomato roots. In both cases, the TRFLP approach yielded the desired results at a level of resolution comparable to that of the MiSeq method, but at a fraction of the cost. Community fingerprinting methods (especially TRFLP) remain relevant for the identification of dominant microbes in a population, the observation of shifts in plant microbiome community diversity, and for screening samples before their use in more sensitive and expensive approaches. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7186905/ /pubmed/32351795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11334 Text en © 2020 Johnston‐Monje and Lopez Mejia. Applications in Plant Sciences is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the Botanical Society of America This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Johnston‐Monje, David
Lopez Mejia, Jessica
Botanical microbiomes on the cheap: Inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi
title Botanical microbiomes on the cheap: Inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi
title_full Botanical microbiomes on the cheap: Inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi
title_fullStr Botanical microbiomes on the cheap: Inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi
title_full_unstemmed Botanical microbiomes on the cheap: Inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi
title_short Botanical microbiomes on the cheap: Inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi
title_sort botanical microbiomes on the cheap: inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7186905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32351795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11334
work_keys_str_mv AT johnstonmonjedavid botanicalmicrobiomesonthecheapinexpensivemolecularfingerprintingmethodstostudyplantassociatedcommunitiesofbacteriaandfungi
AT lopezmejiajessica botanicalmicrobiomesonthecheapinexpensivemolecularfingerprintingmethodstostudyplantassociatedcommunitiesofbacteriaandfungi