Cargando…
Botanical microbiomes on the cheap: Inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi
High‐throughput sequencing technologies have revolutionized the study of plant‐associated microbial populations, but they are relatively expensive. Molecular fingerprinting techniques are more affordable, yet yield considerably less information about the microbial community. Does this mean they are...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7186905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32351795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11334 |
_version_ | 1783527057047683072 |
---|---|
author | Johnston‐Monje, David Lopez Mejia, Jessica |
author_facet | Johnston‐Monje, David Lopez Mejia, Jessica |
author_sort | Johnston‐Monje, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | High‐throughput sequencing technologies have revolutionized the study of plant‐associated microbial populations, but they are relatively expensive. Molecular fingerprinting techniques are more affordable, yet yield considerably less information about the microbial community. Does this mean they are no longer useful for plant microbiome research? In this paper, we review the past 10 years of studies on plant‐associated microbiomes using molecular fingerprinting methodologies, including single‐strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), amplicon length heterogeneity PCR (LH‐PCR), ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (RISA) and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA), and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP). We also present data juxtaposing results from TRFLP methods with those generated using Illumina sequencing in the comparison of rhizobacterial populations of Brazilian maize and fungal surveys in Canadian tomato roots. In both cases, the TRFLP approach yielded the desired results at a level of resolution comparable to that of the MiSeq method, but at a fraction of the cost. Community fingerprinting methods (especially TRFLP) remain relevant for the identification of dominant microbes in a population, the observation of shifts in plant microbiome community diversity, and for screening samples before their use in more sensitive and expensive approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7186905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71869052020-04-29 Botanical microbiomes on the cheap: Inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi Johnston‐Monje, David Lopez Mejia, Jessica Appl Plant Sci Review Article High‐throughput sequencing technologies have revolutionized the study of plant‐associated microbial populations, but they are relatively expensive. Molecular fingerprinting techniques are more affordable, yet yield considerably less information about the microbial community. Does this mean they are no longer useful for plant microbiome research? In this paper, we review the past 10 years of studies on plant‐associated microbiomes using molecular fingerprinting methodologies, including single‐strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), amplicon length heterogeneity PCR (LH‐PCR), ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (RISA) and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA), and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP). We also present data juxtaposing results from TRFLP methods with those generated using Illumina sequencing in the comparison of rhizobacterial populations of Brazilian maize and fungal surveys in Canadian tomato roots. In both cases, the TRFLP approach yielded the desired results at a level of resolution comparable to that of the MiSeq method, but at a fraction of the cost. Community fingerprinting methods (especially TRFLP) remain relevant for the identification of dominant microbes in a population, the observation of shifts in plant microbiome community diversity, and for screening samples before their use in more sensitive and expensive approaches. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7186905/ /pubmed/32351795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11334 Text en © 2020 Johnston‐Monje and Lopez Mejia. Applications in Plant Sciences is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the Botanical Society of America This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Johnston‐Monje, David Lopez Mejia, Jessica Botanical microbiomes on the cheap: Inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi |
title | Botanical microbiomes on the cheap: Inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi |
title_full | Botanical microbiomes on the cheap: Inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi |
title_fullStr | Botanical microbiomes on the cheap: Inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi |
title_full_unstemmed | Botanical microbiomes on the cheap: Inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi |
title_short | Botanical microbiomes on the cheap: Inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi |
title_sort | botanical microbiomes on the cheap: inexpensive molecular fingerprinting methods to study plant‐associated communities of bacteria and fungi |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7186905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32351795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aps3.11334 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnstonmonjedavid botanicalmicrobiomesonthecheapinexpensivemolecularfingerprintingmethodstostudyplantassociatedcommunitiesofbacteriaandfungi AT lopezmejiajessica botanicalmicrobiomesonthecheapinexpensivemolecularfingerprintingmethodstostudyplantassociatedcommunitiesofbacteriaandfungi |