Cargando…
Comparison of the prognostic ability of quantitative traumatic methods patients admitted to Imam Khomeini Hospital of Urmia in 2016
BACKGROUND: Trauma is the major cause of disability in industrial societies and its management needs major asset in order to setting up specialized trauma centers. In Iran trauma is the main cause of long term capability. The aim of this study is to compare the prognostic ability of the several t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187098/ |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Trauma is the major cause of disability in industrial societies and its management needs major asset in order to setting up specialized trauma centers. In Iran trauma is the main cause of long term capability. The aim of this study is to compare the prognostic ability of the several traumatic measurements which conventionally were used. Patients which refered to Urmia Imam Khomeini University Hospital in 2016 enrolled in our study. METHODS: In this study severity of trauma in patients with traffic accident referred to Urmia Imam Khomeini University hospital determined using ISS, RTS.TRISS, and ASCOT scoring systems along with one-year period. Demographic data, mortality rate, hospitalization days and total hospital costs were collected and analyzed by regression methods and ROC curve. For this purpose, the records of hospital casualties were reviewed. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 33.63 ± 18.53 and the age range was between 1-96 years. The ratio of male to female was 2.73. The average severity of lesions based on the ISS system was 16.44 ± 16.28 and 16.8% of the ISS injured were over 25. The difference in severity of trauma (calculated by each of the methods (ISS, RTS, TRISS, ASCOT) were significant between survivors and those who died. The ISS system had the highest correlation with hospital stay (0.616) and hospital costs (0/123). There was a significant correlation between the four methods with hospitalization and hospitalization days, but the coefficient of determination in each of the four methods was from 0/167 (length of hospitalization) and hospital cost (0/123) did not go. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the highest mortality rate was related to the RTS and TRISS methods and the best way to predict hospital costs and duration of hospitalization was to use the ISS method. Considering the usefulness and special applications of these methods. KEYWORDS: Trauma, Accident, TRISS, ISS, RTS, ASCOT |
---|