Cargando…
Sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues
Non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) can determine the sex of the fetus very accurately and very early in gestation. There are concerns that the ease, timing, and accuracy of NIPT sex determination will facilitate sex‐selective termination of pregnancy (TOP). Here, we review current practices, the e...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31499588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5555 |
_version_ | 1783527135238946816 |
---|---|
author | Bowman‐Smart, Hilary Savulescu, Julian Gyngell, Christopher Mand, Cara Delatycki, Martin B. |
author_facet | Bowman‐Smart, Hilary Savulescu, Julian Gyngell, Christopher Mand, Cara Delatycki, Martin B. |
author_sort | Bowman‐Smart, Hilary |
collection | PubMed |
description | Non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) can determine the sex of the fetus very accurately and very early in gestation. There are concerns that the ease, timing, and accuracy of NIPT sex determination will facilitate sex‐selective termination of pregnancy (TOP). Here, we review current practices, the evidence for a link between NIPT and sex‐selective TOP, and associated ethical issues. Sex‐selective TOP, usually motivated by son preference, has had serious demographic consequences in countries such as India and China. Currently, ultrasound is the primary method by which parents determine the sex of the fetus. The diffusion of ultrasound technology has had a direct impact on the rates of sex‐selective TOP. Although NIPT is currently more costly, it is feasible that increased uptake of this technology could have a similar effect. Partly because NIPT is a relatively recent development in prenatal screening, there is little data on the impact of NIPT on sex selection practices. Evidence that NIPT is playing a role in sex‐selective TOP remains largely anecdotal. Further research is required to assess and quantify TOP resulting from NIPT sex determination. The use of these technologies for sex selection raises a number of ethical issues, in addition to practical demographic consequences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7187249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71872492020-04-28 Sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues Bowman‐Smart, Hilary Savulescu, Julian Gyngell, Christopher Mand, Cara Delatycki, Martin B. Prenat Diagn Reviews Non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) can determine the sex of the fetus very accurately and very early in gestation. There are concerns that the ease, timing, and accuracy of NIPT sex determination will facilitate sex‐selective termination of pregnancy (TOP). Here, we review current practices, the evidence for a link between NIPT and sex‐selective TOP, and associated ethical issues. Sex‐selective TOP, usually motivated by son preference, has had serious demographic consequences in countries such as India and China. Currently, ultrasound is the primary method by which parents determine the sex of the fetus. The diffusion of ultrasound technology has had a direct impact on the rates of sex‐selective TOP. Although NIPT is currently more costly, it is feasible that increased uptake of this technology could have a similar effect. Partly because NIPT is a relatively recent development in prenatal screening, there is little data on the impact of NIPT on sex selection practices. Evidence that NIPT is playing a role in sex‐selective TOP remains largely anecdotal. Further research is required to assess and quantify TOP resulting from NIPT sex determination. The use of these technologies for sex selection raises a number of ethical issues, in addition to practical demographic consequences. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-10 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7187249/ /pubmed/31499588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5555 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Bowman‐Smart, Hilary Savulescu, Julian Gyngell, Christopher Mand, Cara Delatycki, Martin B. Sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues |
title | Sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues |
title_full | Sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues |
title_fullStr | Sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues |
title_short | Sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues |
title_sort | sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: a review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31499588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5555 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bowmansmarthilary sexselectionandnoninvasiveprenataltestingareviewofcurrentpracticesevidenceandethicalissues AT savulescujulian sexselectionandnoninvasiveprenataltestingareviewofcurrentpracticesevidenceandethicalissues AT gyngellchristopher sexselectionandnoninvasiveprenataltestingareviewofcurrentpracticesevidenceandethicalissues AT mandcara sexselectionandnoninvasiveprenataltestingareviewofcurrentpracticesevidenceandethicalissues AT delatyckimartinb sexselectionandnoninvasiveprenataltestingareviewofcurrentpracticesevidenceandethicalissues |