Cargando…

Sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues

Non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) can determine the sex of the fetus very accurately and very early in gestation. There are concerns that the ease, timing, and accuracy of NIPT sex determination will facilitate sex‐selective termination of pregnancy (TOP). Here, we review current practices, the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowman‐Smart, Hilary, Savulescu, Julian, Gyngell, Christopher, Mand, Cara, Delatycki, Martin B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31499588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5555
_version_ 1783527135238946816
author Bowman‐Smart, Hilary
Savulescu, Julian
Gyngell, Christopher
Mand, Cara
Delatycki, Martin B.
author_facet Bowman‐Smart, Hilary
Savulescu, Julian
Gyngell, Christopher
Mand, Cara
Delatycki, Martin B.
author_sort Bowman‐Smart, Hilary
collection PubMed
description Non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) can determine the sex of the fetus very accurately and very early in gestation. There are concerns that the ease, timing, and accuracy of NIPT sex determination will facilitate sex‐selective termination of pregnancy (TOP). Here, we review current practices, the evidence for a link between NIPT and sex‐selective TOP, and associated ethical issues. Sex‐selective TOP, usually motivated by son preference, has had serious demographic consequences in countries such as India and China. Currently, ultrasound is the primary method by which parents determine the sex of the fetus. The diffusion of ultrasound technology has had a direct impact on the rates of sex‐selective TOP. Although NIPT is currently more costly, it is feasible that increased uptake of this technology could have a similar effect. Partly because NIPT is a relatively recent development in prenatal screening, there is little data on the impact of NIPT on sex selection practices. Evidence that NIPT is playing a role in sex‐selective TOP remains largely anecdotal. Further research is required to assess and quantify TOP resulting from NIPT sex determination. The use of these technologies for sex selection raises a number of ethical issues, in addition to practical demographic consequences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7187249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71872492020-04-28 Sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues Bowman‐Smart, Hilary Savulescu, Julian Gyngell, Christopher Mand, Cara Delatycki, Martin B. Prenat Diagn Reviews Non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) can determine the sex of the fetus very accurately and very early in gestation. There are concerns that the ease, timing, and accuracy of NIPT sex determination will facilitate sex‐selective termination of pregnancy (TOP). Here, we review current practices, the evidence for a link between NIPT and sex‐selective TOP, and associated ethical issues. Sex‐selective TOP, usually motivated by son preference, has had serious demographic consequences in countries such as India and China. Currently, ultrasound is the primary method by which parents determine the sex of the fetus. The diffusion of ultrasound technology has had a direct impact on the rates of sex‐selective TOP. Although NIPT is currently more costly, it is feasible that increased uptake of this technology could have a similar effect. Partly because NIPT is a relatively recent development in prenatal screening, there is little data on the impact of NIPT on sex selection practices. Evidence that NIPT is playing a role in sex‐selective TOP remains largely anecdotal. Further research is required to assess and quantify TOP resulting from NIPT sex determination. The use of these technologies for sex selection raises a number of ethical issues, in addition to practical demographic consequences. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-10 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7187249/ /pubmed/31499588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5555 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Bowman‐Smart, Hilary
Savulescu, Julian
Gyngell, Christopher
Mand, Cara
Delatycki, Martin B.
Sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues
title Sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues
title_full Sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues
title_fullStr Sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues
title_full_unstemmed Sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues
title_short Sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues
title_sort sex selection and non‐invasive prenatal testing: a review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31499588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5555
work_keys_str_mv AT bowmansmarthilary sexselectionandnoninvasiveprenataltestingareviewofcurrentpracticesevidenceandethicalissues
AT savulescujulian sexselectionandnoninvasiveprenataltestingareviewofcurrentpracticesevidenceandethicalissues
AT gyngellchristopher sexselectionandnoninvasiveprenataltestingareviewofcurrentpracticesevidenceandethicalissues
AT mandcara sexselectionandnoninvasiveprenataltestingareviewofcurrentpracticesevidenceandethicalissues
AT delatyckimartinb sexselectionandnoninvasiveprenataltestingareviewofcurrentpracticesevidenceandethicalissues