Cargando…
In‐Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement in Children Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Evaluate technical success, tolerability, and safety of lidocaine iontophoresis and tympanostomy tube placement for children in an office setting. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective individual cohort study. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study evaluated in‐office tube placement...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32160320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.28612 |
_version_ | 1783527143532134400 |
---|---|
author | Lustig, Lawrence R. Ingram, Amy Vidrine, D. Macy Gould, Andrew R. Zeiders, Jacob W. Ow, Randall A. Thompson, Christopher R. Moss, Jonathan R. Mehta, Ritvik McClay, John E. Brenski, Amy Gavin, John Waldman, Erik H. Ansley, John Yen, David M. Chadha, Neil K. Murray, Michael T. Kozak, Frederick K. York, Christopher Brown, David M. Grunstein, Eli Sprecher, Robert C. Sherman, Denise A. Schoem, Scott R. Puchalski, Robert Hills, Susannah Calzada, Audrey Harfe, Dan England, Laura J. Syms, Charles A. |
author_facet | Lustig, Lawrence R. Ingram, Amy Vidrine, D. Macy Gould, Andrew R. Zeiders, Jacob W. Ow, Randall A. Thompson, Christopher R. Moss, Jonathan R. Mehta, Ritvik McClay, John E. Brenski, Amy Gavin, John Waldman, Erik H. Ansley, John Yen, David M. Chadha, Neil K. Murray, Michael T. Kozak, Frederick K. York, Christopher Brown, David M. Grunstein, Eli Sprecher, Robert C. Sherman, Denise A. Schoem, Scott R. Puchalski, Robert Hills, Susannah Calzada, Audrey Harfe, Dan England, Laura J. Syms, Charles A. |
author_sort | Lustig, Lawrence R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Evaluate technical success, tolerability, and safety of lidocaine iontophoresis and tympanostomy tube placement for children in an office setting. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective individual cohort study. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study evaluated in‐office tube placement in children ages 6 months through 12 years of age. Anesthesia was achieved via lidocaine/epinephrine iontophoresis. Tube placement was conducted using an integrated and automated myringotomy and tube delivery system. Anxiolytics, sedation, and papoose board were not used. Technical success and safety were evaluated. Patients 5 to 12 years old self‐reported tube placement pain using the Faces Pain Scale–Revised (FPS‐R) instrument, which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very much pain). RESULTS: Children were enrolled into three cohorts with 68, 47, and 222 children in the Operating Room (OR) Lead‐In, Office Lead‐In, and Pivotal cohorts, respectively. In the Pivotal cohort, there were 120 and 102 children in the <5 and 5‐ to 12‐year‐old age groups, respectively, with a mean age of 2.3 and 7.6 years, respectively. Bilateral tube placement was indicated for 94.2% of children <5 and 88.2% of children 5 to 12 years old. Tubes were successfully placed in all indicated ears in 85.8% (103/120) of children <5 and 89.2% (91/102) of children 5 to 12 years old. Mean FPS‐R score was 3.30 (standard deviation [SD] = 3.39) for tube placement and 1.69 (SD = 2.43) at 5 minutes postprocedure. There were no serious adverse events. Nonserious adverse events occurred at rates similar to standard tympanostomy procedures. CONCLUSIONS: In‐office tube placement in selected patients can be successfully achieved without requiring sedatives, anxiolytics, or papoose restraints via lidocaine iontophoresis local anesthesia and an automated myringotomy and tube delivery system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b Laryngoscope, 130:S1–S9, 2020 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7187287 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71872872020-04-28 In‐Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement in Children Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery Lustig, Lawrence R. Ingram, Amy Vidrine, D. Macy Gould, Andrew R. Zeiders, Jacob W. Ow, Randall A. Thompson, Christopher R. Moss, Jonathan R. Mehta, Ritvik McClay, John E. Brenski, Amy Gavin, John Waldman, Erik H. Ansley, John Yen, David M. Chadha, Neil K. Murray, Michael T. Kozak, Frederick K. York, Christopher Brown, David M. Grunstein, Eli Sprecher, Robert C. Sherman, Denise A. Schoem, Scott R. Puchalski, Robert Hills, Susannah Calzada, Audrey Harfe, Dan England, Laura J. Syms, Charles A. Laryngoscope Publication of this supplement is made possible by Tusker Medical. OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Evaluate technical success, tolerability, and safety of lidocaine iontophoresis and tympanostomy tube placement for children in an office setting. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective individual cohort study. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study evaluated in‐office tube placement in children ages 6 months through 12 years of age. Anesthesia was achieved via lidocaine/epinephrine iontophoresis. Tube placement was conducted using an integrated and automated myringotomy and tube delivery system. Anxiolytics, sedation, and papoose board were not used. Technical success and safety were evaluated. Patients 5 to 12 years old self‐reported tube placement pain using the Faces Pain Scale–Revised (FPS‐R) instrument, which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (very much pain). RESULTS: Children were enrolled into three cohorts with 68, 47, and 222 children in the Operating Room (OR) Lead‐In, Office Lead‐In, and Pivotal cohorts, respectively. In the Pivotal cohort, there were 120 and 102 children in the <5 and 5‐ to 12‐year‐old age groups, respectively, with a mean age of 2.3 and 7.6 years, respectively. Bilateral tube placement was indicated for 94.2% of children <5 and 88.2% of children 5 to 12 years old. Tubes were successfully placed in all indicated ears in 85.8% (103/120) of children <5 and 89.2% (91/102) of children 5 to 12 years old. Mean FPS‐R score was 3.30 (standard deviation [SD] = 3.39) for tube placement and 1.69 (SD = 2.43) at 5 minutes postprocedure. There were no serious adverse events. Nonserious adverse events occurred at rates similar to standard tympanostomy procedures. CONCLUSIONS: In‐office tube placement in selected patients can be successfully achieved without requiring sedatives, anxiolytics, or papoose restraints via lidocaine iontophoresis local anesthesia and an automated myringotomy and tube delivery system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b Laryngoscope, 130:S1–S9, 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-03-11 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7187287/ /pubmed/32160320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.28612 Text en © 2020 The Authors. The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Publication of this supplement is made possible by Tusker Medical. Lustig, Lawrence R. Ingram, Amy Vidrine, D. Macy Gould, Andrew R. Zeiders, Jacob W. Ow, Randall A. Thompson, Christopher R. Moss, Jonathan R. Mehta, Ritvik McClay, John E. Brenski, Amy Gavin, John Waldman, Erik H. Ansley, John Yen, David M. Chadha, Neil K. Murray, Michael T. Kozak, Frederick K. York, Christopher Brown, David M. Grunstein, Eli Sprecher, Robert C. Sherman, Denise A. Schoem, Scott R. Puchalski, Robert Hills, Susannah Calzada, Audrey Harfe, Dan England, Laura J. Syms, Charles A. In‐Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement in Children Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery |
title | In‐Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement in Children Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery |
title_full | In‐Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement in Children Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery |
title_fullStr | In‐Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement in Children Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery |
title_full_unstemmed | In‐Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement in Children Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery |
title_short | In‐Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement in Children Using Iontophoresis and Automated Tube Delivery |
title_sort | in‐office tympanostomy tube placement in children using iontophoresis and automated tube delivery |
topic | Publication of this supplement is made possible by Tusker Medical. |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32160320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.28612 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lustiglawrencer inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT ingramamy inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT vidrinedmacy inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT gouldandrewr inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT zeidersjacobw inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT owrandalla inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT thompsonchristopherr inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT mossjonathanr inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT mehtaritvik inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT mcclayjohne inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT brenskiamy inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT gavinjohn inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT waldmanerikh inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT ansleyjohn inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT yendavidm inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT chadhaneilk inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT murraymichaelt inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT kozakfrederickk inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT yorkchristopher inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT browndavidm inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT grunsteineli inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT sprecherrobertc inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT shermandenisea inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT schoemscottr inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT puchalskirobert inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT hillssusannah inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT calzadaaudrey inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT harfedan inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT englandlauraj inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery AT symscharlesa inofficetympanostomytubeplacementinchildrenusingiontophoresisandautomatedtubedelivery |