Cargando…

Carbon substrate re‐orders relative growth of a bacterium using Mo‐, V‐, or Fe‐nitrogenase for nitrogen fixation

Biological nitrogen fixation is catalyzed by the molybdenum (Mo), vanadium (V) and iron (Fe)‐only nitrogenase metalloenzymes. Studies with purified enzymes have found that the ‘alternative’ V‐ and Fe‐nitrogenases generally reduce N(2) more slowly and produce more byproduct H(2) than the Mo‐nitrogena...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luxem, Katja E., Kraepiel, Anne M. L., Zhang, Lichun, Waldbauer, Jacob R., Zhang, Xinning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14955
_version_ 1783527147031232512
author Luxem, Katja E.
Kraepiel, Anne M. L.
Zhang, Lichun
Waldbauer, Jacob R.
Zhang, Xinning
author_facet Luxem, Katja E.
Kraepiel, Anne M. L.
Zhang, Lichun
Waldbauer, Jacob R.
Zhang, Xinning
author_sort Luxem, Katja E.
collection PubMed
description Biological nitrogen fixation is catalyzed by the molybdenum (Mo), vanadium (V) and iron (Fe)‐only nitrogenase metalloenzymes. Studies with purified enzymes have found that the ‘alternative’ V‐ and Fe‐nitrogenases generally reduce N(2) more slowly and produce more byproduct H(2) than the Mo‐nitrogenase, leading to an assumption that their usage results in slower growth. Here we show that, in the metabolically versatile photoheterotroph Rhodopseudomonas palustris, the type of carbon substrate influences the relative rates of diazotrophic growth based on different nitrogenase isoforms. The V‐nitrogenase supports growth as fast as the Mo‐nitrogenase on acetate but not on the more oxidized substrate succinate. Our data suggest that this is due to insufficient electron flux to the V‐nitrogenase isoform on succinate compared with acetate. Despite slightly faster growth based on the V‐nitrogenase on acetate, the wild‐type strain uses exclusively the Mo‐nitrogenase on both carbon substrates. Notably, the differences in H(2):N(2) stoichiometry by alternative nitrogenases (~1.5 for V‐nitrogenase, ~4–7 for Fe‐nitrogenase) and Mo‐nitrogenase (~1) measured here are lower than prior in vitro estimates. These results indicate that the metabolic costs of V‐based nitrogen fixation could be less significant for growth than previously assumed, helping explain why alternative nitrogenase genes persist in diverse diazotroph lineages and are broadly distributed in the environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7187303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71873032020-04-28 Carbon substrate re‐orders relative growth of a bacterium using Mo‐, V‐, or Fe‐nitrogenase for nitrogen fixation Luxem, Katja E. Kraepiel, Anne M. L. Zhang, Lichun Waldbauer, Jacob R. Zhang, Xinning Environ Microbiol Research Articles Biological nitrogen fixation is catalyzed by the molybdenum (Mo), vanadium (V) and iron (Fe)‐only nitrogenase metalloenzymes. Studies with purified enzymes have found that the ‘alternative’ V‐ and Fe‐nitrogenases generally reduce N(2) more slowly and produce more byproduct H(2) than the Mo‐nitrogenase, leading to an assumption that their usage results in slower growth. Here we show that, in the metabolically versatile photoheterotroph Rhodopseudomonas palustris, the type of carbon substrate influences the relative rates of diazotrophic growth based on different nitrogenase isoforms. The V‐nitrogenase supports growth as fast as the Mo‐nitrogenase on acetate but not on the more oxidized substrate succinate. Our data suggest that this is due to insufficient electron flux to the V‐nitrogenase isoform on succinate compared with acetate. Despite slightly faster growth based on the V‐nitrogenase on acetate, the wild‐type strain uses exclusively the Mo‐nitrogenase on both carbon substrates. Notably, the differences in H(2):N(2) stoichiometry by alternative nitrogenases (~1.5 for V‐nitrogenase, ~4–7 for Fe‐nitrogenase) and Mo‐nitrogenase (~1) measured here are lower than prior in vitro estimates. These results indicate that the metabolic costs of V‐based nitrogen fixation could be less significant for growth than previously assumed, helping explain why alternative nitrogenase genes persist in diverse diazotroph lineages and are broadly distributed in the environment. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-02-29 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7187303/ /pubmed/32090445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14955 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Environmental Microbiology published by Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Luxem, Katja E.
Kraepiel, Anne M. L.
Zhang, Lichun
Waldbauer, Jacob R.
Zhang, Xinning
Carbon substrate re‐orders relative growth of a bacterium using Mo‐, V‐, or Fe‐nitrogenase for nitrogen fixation
title Carbon substrate re‐orders relative growth of a bacterium using Mo‐, V‐, or Fe‐nitrogenase for nitrogen fixation
title_full Carbon substrate re‐orders relative growth of a bacterium using Mo‐, V‐, or Fe‐nitrogenase for nitrogen fixation
title_fullStr Carbon substrate re‐orders relative growth of a bacterium using Mo‐, V‐, or Fe‐nitrogenase for nitrogen fixation
title_full_unstemmed Carbon substrate re‐orders relative growth of a bacterium using Mo‐, V‐, or Fe‐nitrogenase for nitrogen fixation
title_short Carbon substrate re‐orders relative growth of a bacterium using Mo‐, V‐, or Fe‐nitrogenase for nitrogen fixation
title_sort carbon substrate re‐orders relative growth of a bacterium using mo‐, v‐, or fe‐nitrogenase for nitrogen fixation
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14955
work_keys_str_mv AT luxemkatjae carbonsubstratereordersrelativegrowthofabacteriumusingmovorfenitrogenasefornitrogenfixation
AT kraepielanneml carbonsubstratereordersrelativegrowthofabacteriumusingmovorfenitrogenasefornitrogenfixation
AT zhanglichun carbonsubstratereordersrelativegrowthofabacteriumusingmovorfenitrogenasefornitrogenfixation
AT waldbauerjacobr carbonsubstratereordersrelativegrowthofabacteriumusingmovorfenitrogenasefornitrogenfixation
AT zhangxinning carbonsubstratereordersrelativegrowthofabacteriumusingmovorfenitrogenasefornitrogenfixation