Cargando…

Comparative effects of sulphonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors added to metformin monotherapy: a propensity‐score matched cohort study in UK primary care

AIM: To assess the comparative effects of sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, sulphonylureas (SUs) and dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors on cardiometabolic risk factors in routine care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using primary care data on 10 631 new users of SUs, SGLT2 inhibitor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilkinson, Samantha, Williamson, Elizabeth, Pokrajac, Ana, Fogarty, Damian, Stirnadel‐Farrant, Heide, Smeeth, Liam, Douglas, Ian J., Tomlinson, Laurie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31957254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13970
_version_ 1783527159770382336
author Wilkinson, Samantha
Williamson, Elizabeth
Pokrajac, Ana
Fogarty, Damian
Stirnadel‐Farrant, Heide
Smeeth, Liam
Douglas, Ian J.
Tomlinson, Laurie A.
author_facet Wilkinson, Samantha
Williamson, Elizabeth
Pokrajac, Ana
Fogarty, Damian
Stirnadel‐Farrant, Heide
Smeeth, Liam
Douglas, Ian J.
Tomlinson, Laurie A.
author_sort Wilkinson, Samantha
collection PubMed
description AIM: To assess the comparative effects of sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, sulphonylureas (SUs) and dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors on cardiometabolic risk factors in routine care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using primary care data on 10 631 new users of SUs, SGLT2 inhibitors or DPP‐4 inhibitors added to metformin, obtained from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we created propensity‐score matched cohorts and used linear mixed models to describe changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), systolic blood pressure (BP) and body mass index (BMI) over 96 weeks. RESULTS: HbA1c levels fell substantially after treatment intensification for all drugs: mean change at week 12: SGLT2 inhibitors: −15.2 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval [CI] –16.9, −13.5); SUs: −14.3 mmol/mol (95% CI –15.5, −13.2); and DPP‐4 inhibitors: −11.9 mmol/mol (95% CI –13.1, −10.6). Systolic BP fell for SGLT2 inhibitor users throughout follow‐up, but not for DPP‐4 inhibitor or SU users: mean change at week 12: SGLT2 inhibitors: −2.3 mmHg (95% CI –3.8, −0.8); SUs: −0.8 mmHg (95% CI –1.9, +0.4); and DPP‐4 inhibitors: −0.9 mmHg (95% CI –2.1,+0.2). BMI decreased for SGLT2 inhibitor and DPP‐4 inhibitor users, but not SU users: mean change at week 12: SGLT2 inhibitors: −0.7 kg/m(2) (95% CI –0.9, −0.5); SUs: 0.0 kg/m(2) (95% CI –0.3, +0.2); and DPP‐4 inhibitors: −0.3 kg/m(2) (95% CI –0.5, −0.1). eGFR fell at 12 weeks for SGLT2 inhibitor and DPP‐4 inhibitor users. At 60 weeks, the fall in eGFR from baseline was similar for each drug class. CONCLUSIONS: In routine care, SGLT2 inhibitors had greater effects on cardiometabolic risk factors than SUs. Routine care data closely replicated the effects of diabetes drugs on physiological variables measured in clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7187358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71873582020-04-28 Comparative effects of sulphonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors added to metformin monotherapy: a propensity‐score matched cohort study in UK primary care Wilkinson, Samantha Williamson, Elizabeth Pokrajac, Ana Fogarty, Damian Stirnadel‐Farrant, Heide Smeeth, Liam Douglas, Ian J. Tomlinson, Laurie A. Diabetes Obes Metab Original Articles AIM: To assess the comparative effects of sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, sulphonylureas (SUs) and dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4) inhibitors on cardiometabolic risk factors in routine care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using primary care data on 10 631 new users of SUs, SGLT2 inhibitors or DPP‐4 inhibitors added to metformin, obtained from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we created propensity‐score matched cohorts and used linear mixed models to describe changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), systolic blood pressure (BP) and body mass index (BMI) over 96 weeks. RESULTS: HbA1c levels fell substantially after treatment intensification for all drugs: mean change at week 12: SGLT2 inhibitors: −15.2 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval [CI] –16.9, −13.5); SUs: −14.3 mmol/mol (95% CI –15.5, −13.2); and DPP‐4 inhibitors: −11.9 mmol/mol (95% CI –13.1, −10.6). Systolic BP fell for SGLT2 inhibitor users throughout follow‐up, but not for DPP‐4 inhibitor or SU users: mean change at week 12: SGLT2 inhibitors: −2.3 mmHg (95% CI –3.8, −0.8); SUs: −0.8 mmHg (95% CI –1.9, +0.4); and DPP‐4 inhibitors: −0.9 mmHg (95% CI –2.1,+0.2). BMI decreased for SGLT2 inhibitor and DPP‐4 inhibitor users, but not SU users: mean change at week 12: SGLT2 inhibitors: −0.7 kg/m(2) (95% CI –0.9, −0.5); SUs: 0.0 kg/m(2) (95% CI –0.3, +0.2); and DPP‐4 inhibitors: −0.3 kg/m(2) (95% CI –0.5, −0.1). eGFR fell at 12 weeks for SGLT2 inhibitor and DPP‐4 inhibitor users. At 60 weeks, the fall in eGFR from baseline was similar for each drug class. CONCLUSIONS: In routine care, SGLT2 inhibitors had greater effects on cardiometabolic risk factors than SUs. Routine care data closely replicated the effects of diabetes drugs on physiological variables measured in clinical trials. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2020-02-13 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7187358/ /pubmed/31957254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13970 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wilkinson, Samantha
Williamson, Elizabeth
Pokrajac, Ana
Fogarty, Damian
Stirnadel‐Farrant, Heide
Smeeth, Liam
Douglas, Ian J.
Tomlinson, Laurie A.
Comparative effects of sulphonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors added to metformin monotherapy: a propensity‐score matched cohort study in UK primary care
title Comparative effects of sulphonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors added to metformin monotherapy: a propensity‐score matched cohort study in UK primary care
title_full Comparative effects of sulphonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors added to metformin monotherapy: a propensity‐score matched cohort study in UK primary care
title_fullStr Comparative effects of sulphonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors added to metformin monotherapy: a propensity‐score matched cohort study in UK primary care
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effects of sulphonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors added to metformin monotherapy: a propensity‐score matched cohort study in UK primary care
title_short Comparative effects of sulphonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors added to metformin monotherapy: a propensity‐score matched cohort study in UK primary care
title_sort comparative effects of sulphonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors added to metformin monotherapy: a propensity‐score matched cohort study in uk primary care
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31957254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13970
work_keys_str_mv AT wilkinsonsamantha comparativeeffectsofsulphonylureasdipeptidylpeptidase4inhibitorsandsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsaddedtometforminmonotherapyapropensityscorematchedcohortstudyinukprimarycare
AT williamsonelizabeth comparativeeffectsofsulphonylureasdipeptidylpeptidase4inhibitorsandsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsaddedtometforminmonotherapyapropensityscorematchedcohortstudyinukprimarycare
AT pokrajacana comparativeeffectsofsulphonylureasdipeptidylpeptidase4inhibitorsandsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsaddedtometforminmonotherapyapropensityscorematchedcohortstudyinukprimarycare
AT fogartydamian comparativeeffectsofsulphonylureasdipeptidylpeptidase4inhibitorsandsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsaddedtometforminmonotherapyapropensityscorematchedcohortstudyinukprimarycare
AT stirnadelfarrantheide comparativeeffectsofsulphonylureasdipeptidylpeptidase4inhibitorsandsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsaddedtometforminmonotherapyapropensityscorematchedcohortstudyinukprimarycare
AT smeethliam comparativeeffectsofsulphonylureasdipeptidylpeptidase4inhibitorsandsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsaddedtometforminmonotherapyapropensityscorematchedcohortstudyinukprimarycare
AT douglasianj comparativeeffectsofsulphonylureasdipeptidylpeptidase4inhibitorsandsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsaddedtometforminmonotherapyapropensityscorematchedcohortstudyinukprimarycare
AT tomlinsonlauriea comparativeeffectsofsulphonylureasdipeptidylpeptidase4inhibitorsandsodiumglucosecotransporter2inhibitorsaddedtometforminmonotherapyapropensityscorematchedcohortstudyinukprimarycare