Cargando…
Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal requirements for ultraprotective mechanical ventilation: Mathematical model predictions
Extracorporeal carbon dioxide (CO(2)) removal (ECCO(2)R) facilitates the use of low tidal volumes during protective or ultraprotective mechanical ventilation when managing patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); however, the rate of ECCO(2)R required to avoid hypercapnia remains un...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187447/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31769043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aor.13601 |
Sumario: | Extracorporeal carbon dioxide (CO(2)) removal (ECCO(2)R) facilitates the use of low tidal volumes during protective or ultraprotective mechanical ventilation when managing patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); however, the rate of ECCO(2)R required to avoid hypercapnia remains unclear. We calculated ECCO(2)R rate requirements to maintain arterial partial pressure of CO(2) (PaCO(2)) at clinically desirable levels in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients using a six‐compartment mathematical model of CO(2) and oxygen (O(2)) biochemistry and whole‐body transport with the inclusion of an ECCO(2)R device for extracorporeal veno‐venous removal of CO(2). The model assumes steady state conditions. Model compartments were lung capillary blood, arterial blood, venous blood, post‐ECCO(2)R venous blood, interstitial fluid and tissue cells, with CO(2) and O(2) distribution within each compartment; biochemistry included equilibrium among bicarbonate and non‐bicarbonate buffers and CO(2) and O(2) binding to hemoglobin to elucidate Bohr and Haldane effects. O(2) consumption and CO(2) production rates were assumed proportional to predicted body weight (PBW) and adjusted to achieve reported arterial partial pressure of O(2) and a PaCO(2) level of 46 mmHg at a tidal volume of 7.6 mL/kg PBW in the absence of an ECCO(2)R device based on average data from LUNG SAFE. Model calculations showed that ECCO(2)R rates required to achieve mild permissive hypercapnia (PaCO(2) of 46 mmHg) at a ventilation frequency or respiratory rate of 20.8/min during mechanical ventilation increased when tidal volumes decreased from 7.6 to 3 mL/kg PBW. Higher ECCO2R rates were required to achieve normocapnia (PaCO2 of 40 mmHg). Model calculations also showed that required ECCO2R rates were lower when ventilation frequencies were increased from 20.8/min to 26/min. The current mathematical model predicts that ECCO2R rates resulting in clinically desirable PaCO2 levels at tidal volumes of 5‐6 mL/kg PBW can likely be achieved in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients with current technologies; use of ultraprotective tidal volumes (3‐4 mL/kg PBW) may be challenging unless high mechanical ventilation frequencies are used. |
---|