Cargando…

Universal screening versus risk‐based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early‐onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Early‐onset group B streptococcal (EOGBS) disease (including sepsis, meningitis, and pneumonia) causes significant morbidity and mortality in newborn infants worldwide. Antibiotic prophylaxis can prevent vertical streptococcal transmission, yet no uniform criteria exist to identify eligi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasperhoven, GF, Al‐Nasiry, S, Bekker, V, Villamor, E, Kramer, BWW
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31913562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16085
_version_ 1783527181136166912
author Hasperhoven, GF
Al‐Nasiry, S
Bekker, V
Villamor, E
Kramer, BWW
author_facet Hasperhoven, GF
Al‐Nasiry, S
Bekker, V
Villamor, E
Kramer, BWW
author_sort Hasperhoven, GF
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early‐onset group B streptococcal (EOGBS) disease (including sepsis, meningitis, and pneumonia) causes significant morbidity and mortality in newborn infants worldwide. Antibiotic prophylaxis can prevent vertical streptococcal transmission, yet no uniform criteria exist to identify eligible women for prophylaxis. Some guidelines recommend universal GBS screening to pregnant women in their third trimester (screening‐based protocol), whereas others employ risk‐based protocols. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of screening‐based versus risk‐based protocols in preventing EOGBS disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: Key words for the database searches included GBS, Streptococcus agalactiae, pregnancy, screening, culture‐based, risk‐based. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were included if they investigated EOGBS disease incidence in newborn infants and compared screening or risk‐based protocols with each other or with controls. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined using Mantel‐Haenszel analyses with random effects. MAIN RESULTS: Seventeen eligible studies were included. In this meta‐analysis, screening was associated with a reduced risk for EOGBS disease compared either with risk‐based protocols (ten studies, RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.32–0.56) or with no policy (four studies, RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11–0.84). Meta‐analysis could not demonstrate a significant effect of risk‐based protocols versus no policy (seven studies, RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.61–1.20). In studies reporting on the use of antibiotics, screening was not associated with higher antibiotic administration rates (31 versus 29%). CONCLUSIONS: Screening‐based protocols were associated with lower incidences of EOGBS disease compared with risk‐based protocols, while not clearly overexposing women to antibiotics. This information is of relevance for future policymaking. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Meta‐analysis: general screening is associated with lower rates of early‐onset group B strep. neonatal sepsis compared with risk‐based protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7187465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71874652020-04-29 Universal screening versus risk‐based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early‐onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis Hasperhoven, GF Al‐Nasiry, S Bekker, V Villamor, E Kramer, BWW BJOG Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Early‐onset group B streptococcal (EOGBS) disease (including sepsis, meningitis, and pneumonia) causes significant morbidity and mortality in newborn infants worldwide. Antibiotic prophylaxis can prevent vertical streptococcal transmission, yet no uniform criteria exist to identify eligible women for prophylaxis. Some guidelines recommend universal GBS screening to pregnant women in their third trimester (screening‐based protocol), whereas others employ risk‐based protocols. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of screening‐based versus risk‐based protocols in preventing EOGBS disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: Key words for the database searches included GBS, Streptococcus agalactiae, pregnancy, screening, culture‐based, risk‐based. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were included if they investigated EOGBS disease incidence in newborn infants and compared screening or risk‐based protocols with each other or with controls. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined using Mantel‐Haenszel analyses with random effects. MAIN RESULTS: Seventeen eligible studies were included. In this meta‐analysis, screening was associated with a reduced risk for EOGBS disease compared either with risk‐based protocols (ten studies, RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.32–0.56) or with no policy (four studies, RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11–0.84). Meta‐analysis could not demonstrate a significant effect of risk‐based protocols versus no policy (seven studies, RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.61–1.20). In studies reporting on the use of antibiotics, screening was not associated with higher antibiotic administration rates (31 versus 29%). CONCLUSIONS: Screening‐based protocols were associated with lower incidences of EOGBS disease compared with risk‐based protocols, while not clearly overexposing women to antibiotics. This information is of relevance for future policymaking. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Meta‐analysis: general screening is associated with lower rates of early‐onset group B strep. neonatal sepsis compared with risk‐based protocols. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-02-04 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7187465/ /pubmed/31913562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16085 Text en 2020 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Hasperhoven, GF
Al‐Nasiry, S
Bekker, V
Villamor, E
Kramer, BWW
Universal screening versus risk‐based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early‐onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Universal screening versus risk‐based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early‐onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Universal screening versus risk‐based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early‐onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Universal screening versus risk‐based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early‐onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Universal screening versus risk‐based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early‐onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Universal screening versus risk‐based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early‐onset group B streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort universal screening versus risk‐based protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis during childbirth to prevent early‐onset group b streptococcal disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31913562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16085
work_keys_str_mv AT hasperhovengf universalscreeningversusriskbasedprotocolsforantibioticprophylaxisduringchildbirthtopreventearlyonsetgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alnasirys universalscreeningversusriskbasedprotocolsforantibioticprophylaxisduringchildbirthtopreventearlyonsetgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bekkerv universalscreeningversusriskbasedprotocolsforantibioticprophylaxisduringchildbirthtopreventearlyonsetgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT villamore universalscreeningversusriskbasedprotocolsforantibioticprophylaxisduringchildbirthtopreventearlyonsetgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kramerbww universalscreeningversusriskbasedprotocolsforantibioticprophylaxisduringchildbirthtopreventearlyonsetgroupbstreptococcaldiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis