Cargando…

Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating personalised care planning for older people with frailty: PROSPER V2 27/11/18

BACKGROUND: Frailty is characterised by increased vulnerability to falls, disability, hospitalisation and care home admission. However, it is relatively reversible in the early stages. Older people living with frailty often have multiple health and social issues which are difficult to address but co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heaven, Anne, Bower, Peter, Cundill, Bonnie, Farrin, Amanda, Foster, Marilyn, Foy, Robbie, Hartley, Suzanne, Hawkins, Rebecca, Hulme, Claire, Humphrey, Sara, Lawton, Rebecca, Parker, Catriona, Pendleton, Neil, West, Robert, Young, John, Clegg, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32355566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00598-x
_version_ 1783527185615683584
author Heaven, Anne
Bower, Peter
Cundill, Bonnie
Farrin, Amanda
Foster, Marilyn
Foy, Robbie
Hartley, Suzanne
Hawkins, Rebecca
Hulme, Claire
Humphrey, Sara
Lawton, Rebecca
Parker, Catriona
Pendleton, Neil
West, Robert
Young, John
Clegg, Andrew
author_facet Heaven, Anne
Bower, Peter
Cundill, Bonnie
Farrin, Amanda
Foster, Marilyn
Foy, Robbie
Hartley, Suzanne
Hawkins, Rebecca
Hulme, Claire
Humphrey, Sara
Lawton, Rebecca
Parker, Catriona
Pendleton, Neil
West, Robert
Young, John
Clegg, Andrew
author_sort Heaven, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Frailty is characterised by increased vulnerability to falls, disability, hospitalisation and care home admission. However, it is relatively reversible in the early stages. Older people living with frailty often have multiple health and social issues which are difficult to address but could benefit from proactive, person-centred care. Personalised care planning aims to improve outcomes through better self-management, care coordination and access to community resources. METHODS: This feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial aims to recruit 400 participants from 11 general practice clusters across Bradford and Leeds in the north of England. Eligible patients will be aged over 65 with an electronic frailty index score of 0.21 (identified via their electronic health record), living in their own homes, without severe cognitive impairment and not in receipt of end of life care. After screening for eligible patients, a restricted 1:1 cluster-level randomisation will be used to allocate practices to the PROSPER intervention, which will be delivered over 12 weeks by a personal independence co-ordinator worker, or usual care. Following initial consent, participants will complete a baseline questionnaire in their own home including measures of health-related quality of life, activities of daily living, depression and health and social care resource use. Follow-up will be at six and 12 months. Feasibility outcomes relate to progression criteria based around recruitment, intervention delivery, retention and follow-up. An embedded process evaluation will contribute to iterative intervention optimisation and logic model development by examining staff training, intervention implementation and contextual factors influencing delivery and uptake of the intervention. DISCUSSION: Whilst personalised care planning can improve outcomes in long-term conditions, implementation in routine settings is poor. We will evaluate the feasibility of conducting a cluster randomised controlled trial of personalised care planning in a community population based on frailty status. Key objectives will be to test fidelity of trial design, gather data to refine sample size calculation for the planned definitive trial, optimise data collection processes and optimise the intervention including training and delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN12363970 – 08/11/18.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7187486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71874862020-04-30 Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating personalised care planning for older people with frailty: PROSPER V2 27/11/18 Heaven, Anne Bower, Peter Cundill, Bonnie Farrin, Amanda Foster, Marilyn Foy, Robbie Hartley, Suzanne Hawkins, Rebecca Hulme, Claire Humphrey, Sara Lawton, Rebecca Parker, Catriona Pendleton, Neil West, Robert Young, John Clegg, Andrew Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Frailty is characterised by increased vulnerability to falls, disability, hospitalisation and care home admission. However, it is relatively reversible in the early stages. Older people living with frailty often have multiple health and social issues which are difficult to address but could benefit from proactive, person-centred care. Personalised care planning aims to improve outcomes through better self-management, care coordination and access to community resources. METHODS: This feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial aims to recruit 400 participants from 11 general practice clusters across Bradford and Leeds in the north of England. Eligible patients will be aged over 65 with an electronic frailty index score of 0.21 (identified via their electronic health record), living in their own homes, without severe cognitive impairment and not in receipt of end of life care. After screening for eligible patients, a restricted 1:1 cluster-level randomisation will be used to allocate practices to the PROSPER intervention, which will be delivered over 12 weeks by a personal independence co-ordinator worker, or usual care. Following initial consent, participants will complete a baseline questionnaire in their own home including measures of health-related quality of life, activities of daily living, depression and health and social care resource use. Follow-up will be at six and 12 months. Feasibility outcomes relate to progression criteria based around recruitment, intervention delivery, retention and follow-up. An embedded process evaluation will contribute to iterative intervention optimisation and logic model development by examining staff training, intervention implementation and contextual factors influencing delivery and uptake of the intervention. DISCUSSION: Whilst personalised care planning can improve outcomes in long-term conditions, implementation in routine settings is poor. We will evaluate the feasibility of conducting a cluster randomised controlled trial of personalised care planning in a community population based on frailty status. Key objectives will be to test fidelity of trial design, gather data to refine sample size calculation for the planned definitive trial, optimise data collection processes and optimise the intervention including training and delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN12363970 – 08/11/18. BioMed Central 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7187486/ /pubmed/32355566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00598-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Heaven, Anne
Bower, Peter
Cundill, Bonnie
Farrin, Amanda
Foster, Marilyn
Foy, Robbie
Hartley, Suzanne
Hawkins, Rebecca
Hulme, Claire
Humphrey, Sara
Lawton, Rebecca
Parker, Catriona
Pendleton, Neil
West, Robert
Young, John
Clegg, Andrew
Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating personalised care planning for older people with frailty: PROSPER V2 27/11/18
title Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating personalised care planning for older people with frailty: PROSPER V2 27/11/18
title_full Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating personalised care planning for older people with frailty: PROSPER V2 27/11/18
title_fullStr Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating personalised care planning for older people with frailty: PROSPER V2 27/11/18
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating personalised care planning for older people with frailty: PROSPER V2 27/11/18
title_short Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating personalised care planning for older people with frailty: PROSPER V2 27/11/18
title_sort study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating personalised care planning for older people with frailty: prosper v2 27/11/18
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32355566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00598-x
work_keys_str_mv AT heavenanne studyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialevaluatingpersonalisedcareplanningforolderpeoplewithfrailtyprosperv2271118
AT bowerpeter studyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialevaluatingpersonalisedcareplanningforolderpeoplewithfrailtyprosperv2271118
AT cundillbonnie studyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialevaluatingpersonalisedcareplanningforolderpeoplewithfrailtyprosperv2271118
AT farrinamanda studyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialevaluatingpersonalisedcareplanningforolderpeoplewithfrailtyprosperv2271118
AT fostermarilyn studyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialevaluatingpersonalisedcareplanningforolderpeoplewithfrailtyprosperv2271118
AT foyrobbie studyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialevaluatingpersonalisedcareplanningforolderpeoplewithfrailtyprosperv2271118
AT hartleysuzanne studyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialevaluatingpersonalisedcareplanningforolderpeoplewithfrailtyprosperv2271118
AT hawkinsrebecca studyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialevaluatingpersonalisedcareplanningforolderpeoplewithfrailtyprosperv2271118
AT hulmeclaire studyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialevaluatingpersonalisedcareplanningforolderpeoplewithfrailtyprosperv2271118
AT humphreysara studyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialevaluatingpersonalisedcareplanningforolderpeoplewithfrailtyprosperv2271118
AT lawtonrebecca studyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialevaluatingpersonalisedcareplanningforolderpeoplewithfrailtyprosperv2271118
AT parkercatriona studyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialevaluatingpersonalisedcareplanningforolderpeoplewithfrailtyprosperv2271118
AT pendletonneil studyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialevaluatingpersonalisedcareplanningforolderpeoplewithfrailtyprosperv2271118
AT westrobert studyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialevaluatingpersonalisedcareplanningforolderpeoplewithfrailtyprosperv2271118
AT youngjohn studyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialevaluatingpersonalisedcareplanningforolderpeoplewithfrailtyprosperv2271118
AT cleggandrew studyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialevaluatingpersonalisedcareplanningforolderpeoplewithfrailtyprosperv2271118