Reply: Endometrial thickness performs poorly as a predictor of IVF outcome, but does the endometrial receptivity array perform any better?

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griesinger, Georg, Cometti, Barbara, Trevisan, Silvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Letter to the Editor
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa015
_version_ 1783527210652532736
author Griesinger, Georg
Cometti, Barbara
Trevisan, Silvia
author_facet Griesinger, Georg
Cometti, Barbara
Trevisan, Silvia
author_sort Griesinger, Georg
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7187692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71876922020-05-01 Reply: Endometrial thickness performs poorly as a predictor of IVF outcome, but does the endometrial receptivity array perform any better? Griesinger, Georg Cometti, Barbara Trevisan, Silvia Hum Reprod Open Letter to the Editor Oxford University Press 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7187692/ /pubmed/32363239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa015 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Letter to the Editor
Griesinger, Georg
Cometti, Barbara
Trevisan, Silvia
Reply: Endometrial thickness performs poorly as a predictor of IVF outcome, but does the endometrial receptivity array perform any better?
title Reply: Endometrial thickness performs poorly as a predictor of IVF outcome, but does the endometrial receptivity array perform any better?
title_full Reply: Endometrial thickness performs poorly as a predictor of IVF outcome, but does the endometrial receptivity array perform any better?
title_fullStr Reply: Endometrial thickness performs poorly as a predictor of IVF outcome, but does the endometrial receptivity array perform any better?
title_full_unstemmed Reply: Endometrial thickness performs poorly as a predictor of IVF outcome, but does the endometrial receptivity array perform any better?
title_short Reply: Endometrial thickness performs poorly as a predictor of IVF outcome, but does the endometrial receptivity array perform any better?
title_sort reply: endometrial thickness performs poorly as a predictor of ivf outcome, but does the endometrial receptivity array perform any better?
topic Letter to the Editor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa015
work_keys_str_mv AT griesingergeorg replyendometrialthicknessperformspoorlyasapredictorofivfoutcomebutdoestheendometrialreceptivityarrayperformanybetter
AT comettibarbara replyendometrialthicknessperformspoorlyasapredictorofivfoutcomebutdoestheendometrialreceptivityarrayperformanybetter
AT trevisansilvia replyendometrialthicknessperformspoorlyasapredictorofivfoutcomebutdoestheendometrialreceptivityarrayperformanybetter

Ejemplares similares