Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay on a fully automated system for rapid on-demand testing in the hospital setting

BACKGROUND: The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic presents a unique challenge for diagnostic laboratories around the world. Automation of workflows in molecular diagnostics is instrumental for coping with the large number of tests ordered by clinicians, as well as providing fast-tracked rapid testing for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nörz, Dominik, Fischer, Nicole, Schultze, Alexander, Kluge, Stefan, Mayer-Runge, Ulrich, Aepfelbacher, Martin, Pfefferle, Susanne, Lütgehetmann, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32388471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104390
_version_ 1783527234307358720
author Nörz, Dominik
Fischer, Nicole
Schultze, Alexander
Kluge, Stefan
Mayer-Runge, Ulrich
Aepfelbacher, Martin
Pfefferle, Susanne
Lütgehetmann, Marc
author_facet Nörz, Dominik
Fischer, Nicole
Schultze, Alexander
Kluge, Stefan
Mayer-Runge, Ulrich
Aepfelbacher, Martin
Pfefferle, Susanne
Lütgehetmann, Marc
author_sort Nörz, Dominik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic presents a unique challenge for diagnostic laboratories around the world. Automation of workflows in molecular diagnostics is instrumental for coping with the large number of tests ordered by clinicians, as well as providing fast-tracked rapid testing for highly urgent cases. In this study we evaluated a SARS-CoV-2 LDT for the NeuMoDx 96 system, a fully automated device performing extraction and real-time PCR. METHODS: A publicly available SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay was adapted for the automated system. Analytical performance was evaluated using in-vitro transcribed RNA and clinical performance was compared to the cobas 6800-based reference assay within the lab. RESULTS: The Envelope (E) Gene-LDT displayed good analytical performance with an LoD of 95.55 cp/mL and no false positives during evaluation of cross-reactivity. A total of 176 patient samples were tested with both the E-Gene-LDT and the reference assay. Positive and negative agreement were 100 % and 99.2 % respectively. Invalid-rate was 6.3 %. CONCLUSION: The E-Gene-LDT showed analytical and clinical performance comparable to the cobas6800-based reference assay. Due to its random-access workflow concept and rapid time-to-result of about 80 min, the system is very well suited for providing fast-tracked SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics for urgent clinical samples in the hospital setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7187839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71878392020-04-28 Clinical evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay on a fully automated system for rapid on-demand testing in the hospital setting Nörz, Dominik Fischer, Nicole Schultze, Alexander Kluge, Stefan Mayer-Runge, Ulrich Aepfelbacher, Martin Pfefferle, Susanne Lütgehetmann, Marc J Clin Virol Article BACKGROUND: The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic presents a unique challenge for diagnostic laboratories around the world. Automation of workflows in molecular diagnostics is instrumental for coping with the large number of tests ordered by clinicians, as well as providing fast-tracked rapid testing for highly urgent cases. In this study we evaluated a SARS-CoV-2 LDT for the NeuMoDx 96 system, a fully automated device performing extraction and real-time PCR. METHODS: A publicly available SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay was adapted for the automated system. Analytical performance was evaluated using in-vitro transcribed RNA and clinical performance was compared to the cobas 6800-based reference assay within the lab. RESULTS: The Envelope (E) Gene-LDT displayed good analytical performance with an LoD of 95.55 cp/mL and no false positives during evaluation of cross-reactivity. A total of 176 patient samples were tested with both the E-Gene-LDT and the reference assay. Positive and negative agreement were 100 % and 99.2 % respectively. Invalid-rate was 6.3 %. CONCLUSION: The E-Gene-LDT showed analytical and clinical performance comparable to the cobas6800-based reference assay. Due to its random-access workflow concept and rapid time-to-result of about 80 min, the system is very well suited for providing fast-tracked SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics for urgent clinical samples in the hospital setting. Elsevier B.V. 2020-07 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7187839/ /pubmed/32388471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104390 Text en © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Nörz, Dominik
Fischer, Nicole
Schultze, Alexander
Kluge, Stefan
Mayer-Runge, Ulrich
Aepfelbacher, Martin
Pfefferle, Susanne
Lütgehetmann, Marc
Clinical evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay on a fully automated system for rapid on-demand testing in the hospital setting
title Clinical evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay on a fully automated system for rapid on-demand testing in the hospital setting
title_full Clinical evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay on a fully automated system for rapid on-demand testing in the hospital setting
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay on a fully automated system for rapid on-demand testing in the hospital setting
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay on a fully automated system for rapid on-demand testing in the hospital setting
title_short Clinical evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay on a fully automated system for rapid on-demand testing in the hospital setting
title_sort clinical evaluation of a sars-cov-2 rt-pcr assay on a fully automated system for rapid on-demand testing in the hospital setting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32388471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104390
work_keys_str_mv AT norzdominik clinicalevaluationofasarscov2rtpcrassayonafullyautomatedsystemforrapidondemandtestinginthehospitalsetting
AT fischernicole clinicalevaluationofasarscov2rtpcrassayonafullyautomatedsystemforrapidondemandtestinginthehospitalsetting
AT schultzealexander clinicalevaluationofasarscov2rtpcrassayonafullyautomatedsystemforrapidondemandtestinginthehospitalsetting
AT klugestefan clinicalevaluationofasarscov2rtpcrassayonafullyautomatedsystemforrapidondemandtestinginthehospitalsetting
AT mayerrungeulrich clinicalevaluationofasarscov2rtpcrassayonafullyautomatedsystemforrapidondemandtestinginthehospitalsetting
AT aepfelbachermartin clinicalevaluationofasarscov2rtpcrassayonafullyautomatedsystemforrapidondemandtestinginthehospitalsetting
AT pfefferlesusanne clinicalevaluationofasarscov2rtpcrassayonafullyautomatedsystemforrapidondemandtestinginthehospitalsetting
AT lutgehetmannmarc clinicalevaluationofasarscov2rtpcrassayonafullyautomatedsystemforrapidondemandtestinginthehospitalsetting