Cargando…

COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction testing before endoscopy: an economic analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has limited endoscopy utilization, causing significant health and economic losses. We aim to model the impact of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing into resuming endoscopy practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corral, Juan E., Hoogenboom, Sanne A., Kröner, Paul T., Vazquez-Roque, Maria I., Picco, Michael F., Farraye, Francis A., Wallace, Michael B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32360302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.049
_version_ 1783527242724278272
author Corral, Juan E.
Hoogenboom, Sanne A.
Kröner, Paul T.
Vazquez-Roque, Maria I.
Picco, Michael F.
Farraye, Francis A.
Wallace, Michael B.
author_facet Corral, Juan E.
Hoogenboom, Sanne A.
Kröner, Paul T.
Vazquez-Roque, Maria I.
Picco, Michael F.
Farraye, Francis A.
Wallace, Michael B.
author_sort Corral, Juan E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has limited endoscopy utilization, causing significant health and economic losses. We aim to model the impact of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing into resuming endoscopy practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of endoscopy utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic for a baseline reference. A computer model compared 3 approaches: strategy 1, endoscopy for urgent indications only; strategy 2, testing for semiurgent indications; and strategy 3, testing all patients. Analysis was made under current COVID-19 prevalence and projected prevalence of 5% and 10%. Primary outcomes were number of procedures performed and/or canceled. Secondary outcomes were direct costs, reimbursement, personal protective equipment used, and personnel infected. Disease prevalence, testing accuracy, and costs were obtained from the literature. RESULTS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, endoscopy volume was 12.7% of expected. Strategies 2 and 3 were safe and effective interventions to resume endoscopy in semiurgent and elective cases. Investing 22 U.S. dollars (USD) and 105 USD in testing per patient allowed the completion of 19.4% and 95.3% of baseline endoscopies, respectively. False-negative results were seen after testing 4700 patients (or 3 months of applying strategy 2 in our practice). Implementing PCR testing over 1 week in the United States would require 13 and 64 million USD, with a return of 165 and 767 million USD to providers, leaving 65 and 325 healthcare workers infected. CONCLUSIONS: PCR testing is an effective strategy to restart endoscopic practice in the United States. PCR screening should be implemented during the second phase of the pandemic, once the healthcare system is able to test and isolate all suspected COVID-19 cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7187877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71878772020-04-28 COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction testing before endoscopy: an economic analysis Corral, Juan E. Hoogenboom, Sanne A. Kröner, Paul T. Vazquez-Roque, Maria I. Picco, Michael F. Farraye, Francis A. Wallace, Michael B. Gastrointest Endosc Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has limited endoscopy utilization, causing significant health and economic losses. We aim to model the impact of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing into resuming endoscopy practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of endoscopy utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic for a baseline reference. A computer model compared 3 approaches: strategy 1, endoscopy for urgent indications only; strategy 2, testing for semiurgent indications; and strategy 3, testing all patients. Analysis was made under current COVID-19 prevalence and projected prevalence of 5% and 10%. Primary outcomes were number of procedures performed and/or canceled. Secondary outcomes were direct costs, reimbursement, personal protective equipment used, and personnel infected. Disease prevalence, testing accuracy, and costs were obtained from the literature. RESULTS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, endoscopy volume was 12.7% of expected. Strategies 2 and 3 were safe and effective interventions to resume endoscopy in semiurgent and elective cases. Investing 22 U.S. dollars (USD) and 105 USD in testing per patient allowed the completion of 19.4% and 95.3% of baseline endoscopies, respectively. False-negative results were seen after testing 4700 patients (or 3 months of applying strategy 2 in our practice). Implementing PCR testing over 1 week in the United States would require 13 and 64 million USD, with a return of 165 and 767 million USD to providers, leaving 65 and 325 healthcare workers infected. CONCLUSIONS: PCR testing is an effective strategy to restart endoscopic practice in the United States. PCR screening should be implemented during the second phase of the pandemic, once the healthcare system is able to test and isolate all suspected COVID-19 cases. by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2020-09 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7187877/ /pubmed/32360302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.049 Text en © 2020 by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Corral, Juan E.
Hoogenboom, Sanne A.
Kröner, Paul T.
Vazquez-Roque, Maria I.
Picco, Michael F.
Farraye, Francis A.
Wallace, Michael B.
COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction testing before endoscopy: an economic analysis
title COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction testing before endoscopy: an economic analysis
title_full COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction testing before endoscopy: an economic analysis
title_fullStr COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction testing before endoscopy: an economic analysis
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction testing before endoscopy: an economic analysis
title_short COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction testing before endoscopy: an economic analysis
title_sort covid-19 polymerase chain reaction testing before endoscopy: an economic analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32360302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.049
work_keys_str_mv AT corraljuane covid19polymerasechainreactiontestingbeforeendoscopyaneconomicanalysis
AT hoogenboomsannea covid19polymerasechainreactiontestingbeforeendoscopyaneconomicanalysis
AT kronerpault covid19polymerasechainreactiontestingbeforeendoscopyaneconomicanalysis
AT vazquezroquemariai covid19polymerasechainreactiontestingbeforeendoscopyaneconomicanalysis
AT piccomichaelf covid19polymerasechainreactiontestingbeforeendoscopyaneconomicanalysis
AT farrayefrancisa covid19polymerasechainreactiontestingbeforeendoscopyaneconomicanalysis
AT wallacemichaelb covid19polymerasechainreactiontestingbeforeendoscopyaneconomicanalysis