Cargando…
COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction testing before endoscopy: an economic analysis
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has limited endoscopy utilization, causing significant health and economic losses. We aim to model the impact of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing into resuming endoscopy practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32360302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.049 |
_version_ | 1783527242724278272 |
---|---|
author | Corral, Juan E. Hoogenboom, Sanne A. Kröner, Paul T. Vazquez-Roque, Maria I. Picco, Michael F. Farraye, Francis A. Wallace, Michael B. |
author_facet | Corral, Juan E. Hoogenboom, Sanne A. Kröner, Paul T. Vazquez-Roque, Maria I. Picco, Michael F. Farraye, Francis A. Wallace, Michael B. |
author_sort | Corral, Juan E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has limited endoscopy utilization, causing significant health and economic losses. We aim to model the impact of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing into resuming endoscopy practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of endoscopy utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic for a baseline reference. A computer model compared 3 approaches: strategy 1, endoscopy for urgent indications only; strategy 2, testing for semiurgent indications; and strategy 3, testing all patients. Analysis was made under current COVID-19 prevalence and projected prevalence of 5% and 10%. Primary outcomes were number of procedures performed and/or canceled. Secondary outcomes were direct costs, reimbursement, personal protective equipment used, and personnel infected. Disease prevalence, testing accuracy, and costs were obtained from the literature. RESULTS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, endoscopy volume was 12.7% of expected. Strategies 2 and 3 were safe and effective interventions to resume endoscopy in semiurgent and elective cases. Investing 22 U.S. dollars (USD) and 105 USD in testing per patient allowed the completion of 19.4% and 95.3% of baseline endoscopies, respectively. False-negative results were seen after testing 4700 patients (or 3 months of applying strategy 2 in our practice). Implementing PCR testing over 1 week in the United States would require 13 and 64 million USD, with a return of 165 and 767 million USD to providers, leaving 65 and 325 healthcare workers infected. CONCLUSIONS: PCR testing is an effective strategy to restart endoscopic practice in the United States. PCR screening should be implemented during the second phase of the pandemic, once the healthcare system is able to test and isolate all suspected COVID-19 cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7187877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71878772020-04-28 COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction testing before endoscopy: an economic analysis Corral, Juan E. Hoogenboom, Sanne A. Kröner, Paul T. Vazquez-Roque, Maria I. Picco, Michael F. Farraye, Francis A. Wallace, Michael B. Gastrointest Endosc Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has limited endoscopy utilization, causing significant health and economic losses. We aim to model the impact of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing into resuming endoscopy practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of endoscopy utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic for a baseline reference. A computer model compared 3 approaches: strategy 1, endoscopy for urgent indications only; strategy 2, testing for semiurgent indications; and strategy 3, testing all patients. Analysis was made under current COVID-19 prevalence and projected prevalence of 5% and 10%. Primary outcomes were number of procedures performed and/or canceled. Secondary outcomes were direct costs, reimbursement, personal protective equipment used, and personnel infected. Disease prevalence, testing accuracy, and costs were obtained from the literature. RESULTS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, endoscopy volume was 12.7% of expected. Strategies 2 and 3 were safe and effective interventions to resume endoscopy in semiurgent and elective cases. Investing 22 U.S. dollars (USD) and 105 USD in testing per patient allowed the completion of 19.4% and 95.3% of baseline endoscopies, respectively. False-negative results were seen after testing 4700 patients (or 3 months of applying strategy 2 in our practice). Implementing PCR testing over 1 week in the United States would require 13 and 64 million USD, with a return of 165 and 767 million USD to providers, leaving 65 and 325 healthcare workers infected. CONCLUSIONS: PCR testing is an effective strategy to restart endoscopic practice in the United States. PCR screening should be implemented during the second phase of the pandemic, once the healthcare system is able to test and isolate all suspected COVID-19 cases. by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2020-09 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7187877/ /pubmed/32360302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.049 Text en © 2020 by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Corral, Juan E. Hoogenboom, Sanne A. Kröner, Paul T. Vazquez-Roque, Maria I. Picco, Michael F. Farraye, Francis A. Wallace, Michael B. COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction testing before endoscopy: an economic analysis |
title | COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction testing before endoscopy: an economic analysis |
title_full | COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction testing before endoscopy: an economic analysis |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction testing before endoscopy: an economic analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction testing before endoscopy: an economic analysis |
title_short | COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction testing before endoscopy: an economic analysis |
title_sort | covid-19 polymerase chain reaction testing before endoscopy: an economic analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32360302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT corraljuane covid19polymerasechainreactiontestingbeforeendoscopyaneconomicanalysis AT hoogenboomsannea covid19polymerasechainreactiontestingbeforeendoscopyaneconomicanalysis AT kronerpault covid19polymerasechainreactiontestingbeforeendoscopyaneconomicanalysis AT vazquezroquemariai covid19polymerasechainreactiontestingbeforeendoscopyaneconomicanalysis AT piccomichaelf covid19polymerasechainreactiontestingbeforeendoscopyaneconomicanalysis AT farrayefrancisa covid19polymerasechainreactiontestingbeforeendoscopyaneconomicanalysis AT wallacemichaelb covid19polymerasechainreactiontestingbeforeendoscopyaneconomicanalysis |