Cargando…

Combined bacterial and fungal targeted amplicon sequencing of respiratory samples: Does the DNA extraction method matter?

BACKGROUND: High-throughput sequencing techniques are used to analyse the diversity of the respiratory microbiota in health and disease. Although extensive data are available regarding bacterial respiratory microbiota, its fungal component remains poorly studied. This is partly due to the technical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Angebault, Cécile, Payen, Mathilde, Woerther, Paul-Louis, Rodriguez, Christophe, Botterel, Françoise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7188255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32343737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232215
_version_ 1783527281284612096
author Angebault, Cécile
Payen, Mathilde
Woerther, Paul-Louis
Rodriguez, Christophe
Botterel, Françoise
author_facet Angebault, Cécile
Payen, Mathilde
Woerther, Paul-Louis
Rodriguez, Christophe
Botterel, Françoise
author_sort Angebault, Cécile
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High-throughput sequencing techniques are used to analyse the diversity of the respiratory microbiota in health and disease. Although extensive data are available regarding bacterial respiratory microbiota, its fungal component remains poorly studied. This is partly due to the technical issues associated with fungal metagenomics analyses. In this study, we compared two DNA extraction protocols and two fungal amplification targets for combined bacterial and fungal targeted amplicon sequencing analyses of the respiratory microbiota. METHODS: Six sputa, randomly selected from routine samples in Mondor Hospital (Creteil, France) and treated anonymously, were tested after bacterial and fungal routine culture. Two of which were spiked with Aspergillus Fumigati and Aspergillus Nigri (10(5) conidia/mL). After mechanical lysis, DNA was extracted using automated QIAsymphony® extraction (AQE) or manual PowerSoil® MoBio extraction (MPE). DNA yield and purity were compared. DNA extracted from spiked sputa was subjected to (i) real-time PCR for Aspergillus DNA detection and (ii) combined metagenomic analyses targeting barcoded primers for fungal ITS1 and ITS2, and bacterial V1-V2 and V3-V4 16S regions. Amplicon libraries were prepared using MiSeq Reagent V3 kit on Illumina platform. Data were analysed using PyroMIC© and SHAMAN software, and compared with culture results. RESULTS: AQE extraction provided a higher yield of DNA (AQE/MPE DNA ratio = 4.5 [1.3–11]) in a shorter time. The yield of Aspergillus DNA detected by qPCR was similar for spiked sputa regardless of extraction protocol. The extraction moderately impacted the diversity or relative abundances of bacterial communities using targeted amplicon sequencing (2/43 taxa impacted). For fungi, the relative abundances of 4/11 major taxa were impacted and AQE results were closer to culture results. The V1-V2 or V3-V4 and ITS1 or ITS2 targets assessed similarly the diversity of bacterial and fungal major taxa, but ITS2 and V3-V4 detected more minor taxa. CONCLUSION: Our results showed the importance of DNA extraction for combined bacterial and fungal targeted metagenomics of respiratory samples. The extraction protocol can affect DNA yield and the relative abundances of few bacterial but more fungal taxa. For fungal analysis, ITS2 allowed the detection of a greater number of minor taxa compared with ITS1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7188255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71882552020-05-06 Combined bacterial and fungal targeted amplicon sequencing of respiratory samples: Does the DNA extraction method matter? Angebault, Cécile Payen, Mathilde Woerther, Paul-Louis Rodriguez, Christophe Botterel, Françoise PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: High-throughput sequencing techniques are used to analyse the diversity of the respiratory microbiota in health and disease. Although extensive data are available regarding bacterial respiratory microbiota, its fungal component remains poorly studied. This is partly due to the technical issues associated with fungal metagenomics analyses. In this study, we compared two DNA extraction protocols and two fungal amplification targets for combined bacterial and fungal targeted amplicon sequencing analyses of the respiratory microbiota. METHODS: Six sputa, randomly selected from routine samples in Mondor Hospital (Creteil, France) and treated anonymously, were tested after bacterial and fungal routine culture. Two of which were spiked with Aspergillus Fumigati and Aspergillus Nigri (10(5) conidia/mL). After mechanical lysis, DNA was extracted using automated QIAsymphony® extraction (AQE) or manual PowerSoil® MoBio extraction (MPE). DNA yield and purity were compared. DNA extracted from spiked sputa was subjected to (i) real-time PCR for Aspergillus DNA detection and (ii) combined metagenomic analyses targeting barcoded primers for fungal ITS1 and ITS2, and bacterial V1-V2 and V3-V4 16S regions. Amplicon libraries were prepared using MiSeq Reagent V3 kit on Illumina platform. Data were analysed using PyroMIC© and SHAMAN software, and compared with culture results. RESULTS: AQE extraction provided a higher yield of DNA (AQE/MPE DNA ratio = 4.5 [1.3–11]) in a shorter time. The yield of Aspergillus DNA detected by qPCR was similar for spiked sputa regardless of extraction protocol. The extraction moderately impacted the diversity or relative abundances of bacterial communities using targeted amplicon sequencing (2/43 taxa impacted). For fungi, the relative abundances of 4/11 major taxa were impacted and AQE results were closer to culture results. The V1-V2 or V3-V4 and ITS1 or ITS2 targets assessed similarly the diversity of bacterial and fungal major taxa, but ITS2 and V3-V4 detected more minor taxa. CONCLUSION: Our results showed the importance of DNA extraction for combined bacterial and fungal targeted metagenomics of respiratory samples. The extraction protocol can affect DNA yield and the relative abundances of few bacterial but more fungal taxa. For fungal analysis, ITS2 allowed the detection of a greater number of minor taxa compared with ITS1. Public Library of Science 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7188255/ /pubmed/32343737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232215 Text en © 2020 Angebault et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Angebault, Cécile
Payen, Mathilde
Woerther, Paul-Louis
Rodriguez, Christophe
Botterel, Françoise
Combined bacterial and fungal targeted amplicon sequencing of respiratory samples: Does the DNA extraction method matter?
title Combined bacterial and fungal targeted amplicon sequencing of respiratory samples: Does the DNA extraction method matter?
title_full Combined bacterial and fungal targeted amplicon sequencing of respiratory samples: Does the DNA extraction method matter?
title_fullStr Combined bacterial and fungal targeted amplicon sequencing of respiratory samples: Does the DNA extraction method matter?
title_full_unstemmed Combined bacterial and fungal targeted amplicon sequencing of respiratory samples: Does the DNA extraction method matter?
title_short Combined bacterial and fungal targeted amplicon sequencing of respiratory samples: Does the DNA extraction method matter?
title_sort combined bacterial and fungal targeted amplicon sequencing of respiratory samples: does the dna extraction method matter?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7188255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32343737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232215
work_keys_str_mv AT angebaultcecile combinedbacterialandfungaltargetedampliconsequencingofrespiratorysamplesdoesthednaextractionmethodmatter
AT payenmathilde combinedbacterialandfungaltargetedampliconsequencingofrespiratorysamplesdoesthednaextractionmethodmatter
AT woertherpaullouis combinedbacterialandfungaltargetedampliconsequencingofrespiratorysamplesdoesthednaextractionmethodmatter
AT rodriguezchristophe combinedbacterialandfungaltargetedampliconsequencingofrespiratorysamplesdoesthednaextractionmethodmatter
AT botterelfrancoise combinedbacterialandfungaltargetedampliconsequencingofrespiratorysamplesdoesthednaextractionmethodmatter