Cargando…

Key Components of ICU Recovery Programs: What Did Patients Report Provided Benefit?

To understand from the perspective of patients who did, and did not attend ICU recovery programs, what were the most important components of successful programs and how should they be organized. DESIGN: International, qualitative study. SETTING: Fourteen hospitals in the United States, United Kingdo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McPeake, Joanne, Boehm, Leanne M., Hibbert, Elizabeth, Bakhru, Rita N., Bastin, Anthony J., Butcher, Brad W., Eaton, Tammy L., Harris, Wendy, Hope, Aluko A., Jackson, James, Johnson, Annie, Kloos, Janet A., Korzick, Karen A., MacTavish, Pamela, Meyer, Joel, Montgomery-Yates, Ashley, Quasim, Tara, Slack, Andrew, Wade, Dorothy, Still, Mary, Netzer, Giora, Hopkins, Ramona O., Mikkelsen, Mark E., Iwashyna, Theodore J., Haines, Kimberley J., Sevin, Carla M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7188426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000088
_version_ 1783527310570291200
author McPeake, Joanne
Boehm, Leanne M.
Hibbert, Elizabeth
Bakhru, Rita N.
Bastin, Anthony J.
Butcher, Brad W.
Eaton, Tammy L.
Harris, Wendy
Hope, Aluko A.
Jackson, James
Johnson, Annie
Kloos, Janet A.
Korzick, Karen A.
MacTavish, Pamela
Meyer, Joel
Montgomery-Yates, Ashley
Quasim, Tara
Slack, Andrew
Wade, Dorothy
Still, Mary
Netzer, Giora
Hopkins, Ramona O.
Mikkelsen, Mark E.
Iwashyna, Theodore J.
Haines, Kimberley J.
Sevin, Carla M.
author_facet McPeake, Joanne
Boehm, Leanne M.
Hibbert, Elizabeth
Bakhru, Rita N.
Bastin, Anthony J.
Butcher, Brad W.
Eaton, Tammy L.
Harris, Wendy
Hope, Aluko A.
Jackson, James
Johnson, Annie
Kloos, Janet A.
Korzick, Karen A.
MacTavish, Pamela
Meyer, Joel
Montgomery-Yates, Ashley
Quasim, Tara
Slack, Andrew
Wade, Dorothy
Still, Mary
Netzer, Giora
Hopkins, Ramona O.
Mikkelsen, Mark E.
Iwashyna, Theodore J.
Haines, Kimberley J.
Sevin, Carla M.
author_sort McPeake, Joanne
collection PubMed
description To understand from the perspective of patients who did, and did not attend ICU recovery programs, what were the most important components of successful programs and how should they be organized. DESIGN: International, qualitative study. SETTING: Fourteen hospitals in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia. PATIENTS: We conducted 66 semi-structured interviews with a diverse group of patients, 52 of whom had used an ICU recovery program and 14 whom had not. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Using content analysis, prevalent themes were documented to understand what improved their outcomes. Contrasting quotes from patients who had not received certain aspects of care were used to identify perceived differential effectiveness. Successful ICU recovery programs had five key components: 1) Continuity of care; 2) Improving symptom status; 3) Normalization and expectation management; 4) Internal and external validation of progress; and 5) Reducing feelings of guilt and helplessness. The delivery of care which achieved these goals was facilitated by early involvement (even before hospital discharge), direct involvement of ICU staff, and a focus on integration across traditional disease, symptom, and social welfare needs. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter study, conducted across three continents, patients identified specific and reproducible modes of benefit derived from ICU recovery programs, which could be the target of future intervention refinement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7188426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71884262020-05-19 Key Components of ICU Recovery Programs: What Did Patients Report Provided Benefit? McPeake, Joanne Boehm, Leanne M. Hibbert, Elizabeth Bakhru, Rita N. Bastin, Anthony J. Butcher, Brad W. Eaton, Tammy L. Harris, Wendy Hope, Aluko A. Jackson, James Johnson, Annie Kloos, Janet A. Korzick, Karen A. MacTavish, Pamela Meyer, Joel Montgomery-Yates, Ashley Quasim, Tara Slack, Andrew Wade, Dorothy Still, Mary Netzer, Giora Hopkins, Ramona O. Mikkelsen, Mark E. Iwashyna, Theodore J. Haines, Kimberley J. Sevin, Carla M. Crit Care Explor Original Clinical Report To understand from the perspective of patients who did, and did not attend ICU recovery programs, what were the most important components of successful programs and how should they be organized. DESIGN: International, qualitative study. SETTING: Fourteen hospitals in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia. PATIENTS: We conducted 66 semi-structured interviews with a diverse group of patients, 52 of whom had used an ICU recovery program and 14 whom had not. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Using content analysis, prevalent themes were documented to understand what improved their outcomes. Contrasting quotes from patients who had not received certain aspects of care were used to identify perceived differential effectiveness. Successful ICU recovery programs had five key components: 1) Continuity of care; 2) Improving symptom status; 3) Normalization and expectation management; 4) Internal and external validation of progress; and 5) Reducing feelings of guilt and helplessness. The delivery of care which achieved these goals was facilitated by early involvement (even before hospital discharge), direct involvement of ICU staff, and a focus on integration across traditional disease, symptom, and social welfare needs. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter study, conducted across three continents, patients identified specific and reproducible modes of benefit derived from ICU recovery programs, which could be the target of future intervention refinement. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7188426/ /pubmed/32426730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000088 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Report
McPeake, Joanne
Boehm, Leanne M.
Hibbert, Elizabeth
Bakhru, Rita N.
Bastin, Anthony J.
Butcher, Brad W.
Eaton, Tammy L.
Harris, Wendy
Hope, Aluko A.
Jackson, James
Johnson, Annie
Kloos, Janet A.
Korzick, Karen A.
MacTavish, Pamela
Meyer, Joel
Montgomery-Yates, Ashley
Quasim, Tara
Slack, Andrew
Wade, Dorothy
Still, Mary
Netzer, Giora
Hopkins, Ramona O.
Mikkelsen, Mark E.
Iwashyna, Theodore J.
Haines, Kimberley J.
Sevin, Carla M.
Key Components of ICU Recovery Programs: What Did Patients Report Provided Benefit?
title Key Components of ICU Recovery Programs: What Did Patients Report Provided Benefit?
title_full Key Components of ICU Recovery Programs: What Did Patients Report Provided Benefit?
title_fullStr Key Components of ICU Recovery Programs: What Did Patients Report Provided Benefit?
title_full_unstemmed Key Components of ICU Recovery Programs: What Did Patients Report Provided Benefit?
title_short Key Components of ICU Recovery Programs: What Did Patients Report Provided Benefit?
title_sort key components of icu recovery programs: what did patients report provided benefit?
topic Original Clinical Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7188426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32426730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000088
work_keys_str_mv AT mcpeakejoanne keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT boehmleannem keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT hibbertelizabeth keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT bakhruritan keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT bastinanthonyj keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT butcherbradw keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT eatontammyl keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT harriswendy keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT hopealukoa keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT jacksonjames keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT johnsonannie keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT kloosjaneta keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT korzickkarena keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT mactavishpamela keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT meyerjoel keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT montgomeryyatesashley keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT quasimtara keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT slackandrew keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT wadedorothy keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT stillmary keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT netzergiora keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT hopkinsramonao keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT mikkelsenmarke keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT iwashynatheodorej keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT haineskimberleyj keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit
AT sevincarlam keycomponentsoficurecoveryprogramswhatdidpatientsreportprovidedbenefit