Cargando…

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Sulodexide and Other Extended Anticoagulation Treatments for Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis

Objective  This network meta-analysis (NMA) assesses the clinical comparative efficacy and safety of sulodexide versus direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), vitamin K antagonist (VKA), and aspirin in patients with an unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods  We conducted a literature se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pompilio, Giuseppe, Integlia, Davide, Raffetto, Joseph, Palareti, Gualtiero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7188513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32355907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709731
_version_ 1783527325987504128
author Pompilio, Giuseppe
Integlia, Davide
Raffetto, Joseph
Palareti, Gualtiero
author_facet Pompilio, Giuseppe
Integlia, Davide
Raffetto, Joseph
Palareti, Gualtiero
author_sort Pompilio, Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description Objective  This network meta-analysis (NMA) assesses the clinical comparative efficacy and safety of sulodexide versus direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), vitamin K antagonist (VKA), and aspirin in patients with an unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods  We conducted a literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library using both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Reduction in recurrent deep venous thrombosis (r-DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) were the primary efficacy and safety outcomes. Other secondary end points were also included. We performed a fixed, random effects, and hierarchical models Bayesian NMA for each outcome. Results  We identified 18 RCTs and seven observational studies. Random models showed sulodexide is the best treatment compared with DOACs, VKA, and aspirin at reducing the risk of CRNMB, for preventing death from any cause, and VTE/PE/myocardial infarction (MI)/stroke with 0.47, 0.81, and 0.65 probabilities, respectively. In the random model sulodexide was the best treatment for reducing the risk of MB with a 0.50 probability and hierarchical model that confirmed favorable results. Random and hierarchical models showed sulodexide and DOACs to be the best treatments for reducing PE risk. Sulodexide was more effective than aspirin for reducing r-DVT with 0.12 and less of 0.0001 probabilities, respectively. Conclusion  Sulodexide is more effective for reducing MB and CRNMB, for preventing deaths from any cause, and from VTE/PE/MI/stroke, than other treatments, for both random and hierarchical models. Sulodexide showed to be more effective than aspirin in reducing the risk of r-DVT and PE. Sulodexide's reduction in bleeding while protecting from recurrent DVT risk makes this therapeutic option an important alternative for extended anticoagulation treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7188513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71885132020-04-30 Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Sulodexide and Other Extended Anticoagulation Treatments for Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis Pompilio, Giuseppe Integlia, Davide Raffetto, Joseph Palareti, Gualtiero TH Open Objective  This network meta-analysis (NMA) assesses the clinical comparative efficacy and safety of sulodexide versus direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), vitamin K antagonist (VKA), and aspirin in patients with an unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods  We conducted a literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library using both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Reduction in recurrent deep venous thrombosis (r-DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) were the primary efficacy and safety outcomes. Other secondary end points were also included. We performed a fixed, random effects, and hierarchical models Bayesian NMA for each outcome. Results  We identified 18 RCTs and seven observational studies. Random models showed sulodexide is the best treatment compared with DOACs, VKA, and aspirin at reducing the risk of CRNMB, for preventing death from any cause, and VTE/PE/myocardial infarction (MI)/stroke with 0.47, 0.81, and 0.65 probabilities, respectively. In the random model sulodexide was the best treatment for reducing the risk of MB with a 0.50 probability and hierarchical model that confirmed favorable results. Random and hierarchical models showed sulodexide and DOACs to be the best treatments for reducing PE risk. Sulodexide was more effective than aspirin for reducing r-DVT with 0.12 and less of 0.0001 probabilities, respectively. Conclusion  Sulodexide is more effective for reducing MB and CRNMB, for preventing deaths from any cause, and from VTE/PE/MI/stroke, than other treatments, for both random and hierarchical models. Sulodexide showed to be more effective than aspirin in reducing the risk of r-DVT and PE. Sulodexide's reduction in bleeding while protecting from recurrent DVT risk makes this therapeutic option an important alternative for extended anticoagulation treatment. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7188513/ /pubmed/32355907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709731 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Pompilio, Giuseppe
Integlia, Davide
Raffetto, Joseph
Palareti, Gualtiero
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Sulodexide and Other Extended Anticoagulation Treatments for Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis
title Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Sulodexide and Other Extended Anticoagulation Treatments for Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis
title_full Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Sulodexide and Other Extended Anticoagulation Treatments for Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Sulodexide and Other Extended Anticoagulation Treatments for Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Sulodexide and Other Extended Anticoagulation Treatments for Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis
title_short Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Sulodexide and Other Extended Anticoagulation Treatments for Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy and safety of sulodexide and other extended anticoagulation treatments for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism: a bayesian network meta-analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7188513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32355907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709731
work_keys_str_mv AT pompiliogiuseppe comparativeefficacyandsafetyofsulodexideandotherextendedanticoagulationtreatmentsforpreventionofrecurrentvenousthromboembolismabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT integliadavide comparativeefficacyandsafetyofsulodexideandotherextendedanticoagulationtreatmentsforpreventionofrecurrentvenousthromboembolismabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT raffettojoseph comparativeefficacyandsafetyofsulodexideandotherextendedanticoagulationtreatmentsforpreventionofrecurrentvenousthromboembolismabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT palaretigualtiero comparativeefficacyandsafetyofsulodexideandotherextendedanticoagulationtreatmentsforpreventionofrecurrentvenousthromboembolismabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis