Cargando…

Non-inferiority randomised phase 3 trial comparing two radiation schedules (single vs. five fractions) in malignant spinal cord compression

BACKGROUND: The optimal EBRT schedule for MSCC is undetermined. Our aim was to determine whether a single fraction (SF) was non-inferior to five daily fractions (5Fx), for functional motor outcome. METHODS: Patients not proceeding with surgical decompression in this multicentre non-inferiority, Phas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thirion, Pierre G., Dunne, Mary T., Kelly, Paul J., Flavin, Aileen, O’Sullivan, Joe M., Hacking, Dayle, Sasiadek, Wojciech, Small, Cormac, Pomeroy, Maeve M., Martin, Joseph, McArdle, Orla, Parker, Imelda, O’Sullivan, Lydia S., Shannon, Aoife M., Clayton-Lea, Angela, Collins, Conor D., Stevenson, Michael R., Alvarez-Iglesias, Alberto, Armstrong, John G., Moriarty, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7188681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32157242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0768-z
_version_ 1783527343877259264
author Thirion, Pierre G.
Dunne, Mary T.
Kelly, Paul J.
Flavin, Aileen
O’Sullivan, Joe M.
Hacking, Dayle
Sasiadek, Wojciech
Small, Cormac
Pomeroy, Maeve M.
Martin, Joseph
McArdle, Orla
Parker, Imelda
O’Sullivan, Lydia S.
Shannon, Aoife M.
Clayton-Lea, Angela
Collins, Conor D.
Stevenson, Michael R.
Alvarez-Iglesias, Alberto
Armstrong, John G.
Moriarty, Michael
author_facet Thirion, Pierre G.
Dunne, Mary T.
Kelly, Paul J.
Flavin, Aileen
O’Sullivan, Joe M.
Hacking, Dayle
Sasiadek, Wojciech
Small, Cormac
Pomeroy, Maeve M.
Martin, Joseph
McArdle, Orla
Parker, Imelda
O’Sullivan, Lydia S.
Shannon, Aoife M.
Clayton-Lea, Angela
Collins, Conor D.
Stevenson, Michael R.
Alvarez-Iglesias, Alberto
Armstrong, John G.
Moriarty, Michael
author_sort Thirion, Pierre G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal EBRT schedule for MSCC is undetermined. Our aim was to determine whether a single fraction (SF) was non-inferior to five daily fractions (5Fx), for functional motor outcome. METHODS: Patients not proceeding with surgical decompression in this multicentre non-inferiority, Phase 3 trial were randomised to 10 Gy/SF or 20 Gy/5Fx. A change in mobility from baseline to 5 weeks for each patient, was evaluated by a Modified Tomita score: 1 = ‘Walk unaided’, 2 = ‘With walking aid’ and 3 = ‘Bed-bound’. The margin used to establish non-inferiority was a detrimental change of −0.4 in the mean difference between arms. RESULTS: One-hundred and twelve eligible patients were enrolled. Seventy-three patients aged 30–87 were evaluated for the primary analysis. The 95% CI for the difference in the mean change in mobility scores between arms was −0.12 to 0.6. Since −0.4 is not included in the interval, there is evidence that 10 Gy/SF is non-inferior to 20 Gy/5Fx. One grade 3 AE was reported in the 5Fx arm. Twelve (26%) patients in the 5Fx arm had a Grade 2–3 AE compared with six (11%) patients in the SF arm (p = 0.093). CONCLUSION: For mobility preservation, one 10-Gy fraction is non-inferior to 20 Gy in five fractions, in patients with MSCC not proceeding with surgical decompression. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Cancer Trials Ireland ICORG 05-03; NCT00968643; EU-20952.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7188681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71886812021-03-11 Non-inferiority randomised phase 3 trial comparing two radiation schedules (single vs. five fractions) in malignant spinal cord compression Thirion, Pierre G. Dunne, Mary T. Kelly, Paul J. Flavin, Aileen O’Sullivan, Joe M. Hacking, Dayle Sasiadek, Wojciech Small, Cormac Pomeroy, Maeve M. Martin, Joseph McArdle, Orla Parker, Imelda O’Sullivan, Lydia S. Shannon, Aoife M. Clayton-Lea, Angela Collins, Conor D. Stevenson, Michael R. Alvarez-Iglesias, Alberto Armstrong, John G. Moriarty, Michael Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: The optimal EBRT schedule for MSCC is undetermined. Our aim was to determine whether a single fraction (SF) was non-inferior to five daily fractions (5Fx), for functional motor outcome. METHODS: Patients not proceeding with surgical decompression in this multicentre non-inferiority, Phase 3 trial were randomised to 10 Gy/SF or 20 Gy/5Fx. A change in mobility from baseline to 5 weeks for each patient, was evaluated by a Modified Tomita score: 1 = ‘Walk unaided’, 2 = ‘With walking aid’ and 3 = ‘Bed-bound’. The margin used to establish non-inferiority was a detrimental change of −0.4 in the mean difference between arms. RESULTS: One-hundred and twelve eligible patients were enrolled. Seventy-three patients aged 30–87 were evaluated for the primary analysis. The 95% CI for the difference in the mean change in mobility scores between arms was −0.12 to 0.6. Since −0.4 is not included in the interval, there is evidence that 10 Gy/SF is non-inferior to 20 Gy/5Fx. One grade 3 AE was reported in the 5Fx arm. Twelve (26%) patients in the 5Fx arm had a Grade 2–3 AE compared with six (11%) patients in the SF arm (p = 0.093). CONCLUSION: For mobility preservation, one 10-Gy fraction is non-inferior to 20 Gy in five fractions, in patients with MSCC not proceeding with surgical decompression. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Cancer Trials Ireland ICORG 05-03; NCT00968643; EU-20952. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-11 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7188681/ /pubmed/32157242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0768-z Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Cancer Research UK 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Note This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
spellingShingle Article
Thirion, Pierre G.
Dunne, Mary T.
Kelly, Paul J.
Flavin, Aileen
O’Sullivan, Joe M.
Hacking, Dayle
Sasiadek, Wojciech
Small, Cormac
Pomeroy, Maeve M.
Martin, Joseph
McArdle, Orla
Parker, Imelda
O’Sullivan, Lydia S.
Shannon, Aoife M.
Clayton-Lea, Angela
Collins, Conor D.
Stevenson, Michael R.
Alvarez-Iglesias, Alberto
Armstrong, John G.
Moriarty, Michael
Non-inferiority randomised phase 3 trial comparing two radiation schedules (single vs. five fractions) in malignant spinal cord compression
title Non-inferiority randomised phase 3 trial comparing two radiation schedules (single vs. five fractions) in malignant spinal cord compression
title_full Non-inferiority randomised phase 3 trial comparing two radiation schedules (single vs. five fractions) in malignant spinal cord compression
title_fullStr Non-inferiority randomised phase 3 trial comparing two radiation schedules (single vs. five fractions) in malignant spinal cord compression
title_full_unstemmed Non-inferiority randomised phase 3 trial comparing two radiation schedules (single vs. five fractions) in malignant spinal cord compression
title_short Non-inferiority randomised phase 3 trial comparing two radiation schedules (single vs. five fractions) in malignant spinal cord compression
title_sort non-inferiority randomised phase 3 trial comparing two radiation schedules (single vs. five fractions) in malignant spinal cord compression
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7188681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32157242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0768-z
work_keys_str_mv AT thirionpierreg noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT dunnemaryt noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT kellypaulj noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT flavinaileen noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT osullivanjoem noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT hackingdayle noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT sasiadekwojciech noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT smallcormac noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT pomeroymaevem noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT martinjoseph noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT mcardleorla noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT parkerimelda noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT osullivanlydias noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT shannonaoifem noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT claytonleaangela noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT collinsconord noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT stevensonmichaelr noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT alvareziglesiasalberto noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT armstrongjohng noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression
AT moriartymichael noninferiorityrandomisedphase3trialcomparingtworadiationschedulessinglevsfivefractionsinmalignantspinalcordcompression