Cargando…

Small vs. Large Suture Bite-to-Stitch Interval for Closure of Midline Celiotomy in Cats: A Biomechanical Study

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the bursting strength and characterize the mode of failure of cranial and caudal midline celiotomies closed with 2 suture patterns and an absorbable monofilament suture material. Design: Randomized, cadaveric, ex- vivo mechanical testing. Sample:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reina Rodriguez, Fernando S., Milgram, Joshua, Kirby, Barbara M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7188759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32391388
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00206
_version_ 1783527361151500288
author Reina Rodriguez, Fernando S.
Milgram, Joshua
Kirby, Barbara M.
author_facet Reina Rodriguez, Fernando S.
Milgram, Joshua
Kirby, Barbara M.
author_sort Reina Rodriguez, Fernando S.
collection PubMed
description Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the bursting strength and characterize the mode of failure of cranial and caudal midline celiotomies closed with 2 suture patterns and an absorbable monofilament suture material. Design: Randomized, cadaveric, ex- vivo mechanical testing. Sample: Feline cadavers (n = 32). Methods: Specimens were randomized into two groups based on the closure technique (small 2 × 2 mm or large 5 × 5 mm suture-bite-stitch-interval [SBSI] groups). Cranial or caudal midline celiotomies, 7.5 cm long, were created. A custom-made polyurethane bladder was inserted into the abdomen, and the celiotomies were closed in a simple continuous pattern using 3-0 polydioxanone. The repair was loaded to failure by inflating the bladder with compressed air. Bursting strength and mode of failure were recorded. Effects of body weight, gender, thickness and width of linea alba, suture-bite-stitch-interval, and location of celiotomy were analyzed using a mixed model analysis and an independent t- test, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: There was no difference in bursting strength between cranial and caudal celiotomies. Bursting strength was lower for celiotomies closed with a large SBSI (P = 0.003). Bursting strength was greater in males compared to females (P = 0.003). Twenty five specimens failed distant from celiotomy closure, while 4 failed by fascial tearing at the site of needle penetration. Failure by loosening of the suture line with intact knots only occurred in 3 caudal celiotomies closed with a large SBSI. Gender, body weight and SBSI accounted for 61.5% of variability in bursting strength (P = 0.005). Conclusions: Small SBSI technique was mechanically superior to large SBSI when tested under these loading conditions. Clinical relevance: Supraphysiological pressures were required to cause failure in all specimens. Both small and large SBSI may be clinically applicable for midline celiotomy closure in domestic cats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7188759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71887592020-05-08 Small vs. Large Suture Bite-to-Stitch Interval for Closure of Midline Celiotomy in Cats: A Biomechanical Study Reina Rodriguez, Fernando S. Milgram, Joshua Kirby, Barbara M. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the bursting strength and characterize the mode of failure of cranial and caudal midline celiotomies closed with 2 suture patterns and an absorbable monofilament suture material. Design: Randomized, cadaveric, ex- vivo mechanical testing. Sample: Feline cadavers (n = 32). Methods: Specimens were randomized into two groups based on the closure technique (small 2 × 2 mm or large 5 × 5 mm suture-bite-stitch-interval [SBSI] groups). Cranial or caudal midline celiotomies, 7.5 cm long, were created. A custom-made polyurethane bladder was inserted into the abdomen, and the celiotomies were closed in a simple continuous pattern using 3-0 polydioxanone. The repair was loaded to failure by inflating the bladder with compressed air. Bursting strength and mode of failure were recorded. Effects of body weight, gender, thickness and width of linea alba, suture-bite-stitch-interval, and location of celiotomy were analyzed using a mixed model analysis and an independent t- test, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: There was no difference in bursting strength between cranial and caudal celiotomies. Bursting strength was lower for celiotomies closed with a large SBSI (P = 0.003). Bursting strength was greater in males compared to females (P = 0.003). Twenty five specimens failed distant from celiotomy closure, while 4 failed by fascial tearing at the site of needle penetration. Failure by loosening of the suture line with intact knots only occurred in 3 caudal celiotomies closed with a large SBSI. Gender, body weight and SBSI accounted for 61.5% of variability in bursting strength (P = 0.005). Conclusions: Small SBSI technique was mechanically superior to large SBSI when tested under these loading conditions. Clinical relevance: Supraphysiological pressures were required to cause failure in all specimens. Both small and large SBSI may be clinically applicable for midline celiotomy closure in domestic cats. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7188759/ /pubmed/32391388 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00206 Text en Copyright © 2020 Reina Rodriguez, Milgram and Kirby. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Reina Rodriguez, Fernando S.
Milgram, Joshua
Kirby, Barbara M.
Small vs. Large Suture Bite-to-Stitch Interval for Closure of Midline Celiotomy in Cats: A Biomechanical Study
title Small vs. Large Suture Bite-to-Stitch Interval for Closure of Midline Celiotomy in Cats: A Biomechanical Study
title_full Small vs. Large Suture Bite-to-Stitch Interval for Closure of Midline Celiotomy in Cats: A Biomechanical Study
title_fullStr Small vs. Large Suture Bite-to-Stitch Interval for Closure of Midline Celiotomy in Cats: A Biomechanical Study
title_full_unstemmed Small vs. Large Suture Bite-to-Stitch Interval for Closure of Midline Celiotomy in Cats: A Biomechanical Study
title_short Small vs. Large Suture Bite-to-Stitch Interval for Closure of Midline Celiotomy in Cats: A Biomechanical Study
title_sort small vs. large suture bite-to-stitch interval for closure of midline celiotomy in cats: a biomechanical study
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7188759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32391388
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00206
work_keys_str_mv AT reinarodriguezfernandos smallvslargesuturebitetostitchintervalforclosureofmidlineceliotomyincatsabiomechanicalstudy
AT milgramjoshua smallvslargesuturebitetostitchintervalforclosureofmidlineceliotomyincatsabiomechanicalstudy
AT kirbybarbaram smallvslargesuturebitetostitchintervalforclosureofmidlineceliotomyincatsabiomechanicalstudy