Cargando…
Assessment of the Defatting Efficacy of Mechanical and Chemical Treatment for Allograft Cancellous Bone and Its Effects on Biomechanics Properties of Bone
OBJECTIVE: To assess the defatting efficacy of high pressure washing and gradient alcohol and biomechanical properties of defatted bone. METHODS: Fresh cancellous bone was obtained from the femoral condyle and divided into six groups according to different defatting treatments, which were: high pres...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32189444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12639 |
_version_ | 1783527428672454656 |
---|---|
author | Hua, Kun‐chi Feng, Jiang‐tao Yang, Xiong‐gang Wang, Feng Zhang, Hao Yang, Li Zhang, Hao‐ran Xu, Ming‐you Li, Ji‐kai Qiao, Rui‐qi Lun, Deng‐xing Hu, Yong‐cheng |
author_facet | Hua, Kun‐chi Feng, Jiang‐tao Yang, Xiong‐gang Wang, Feng Zhang, Hao Yang, Li Zhang, Hao‐ran Xu, Ming‐you Li, Ji‐kai Qiao, Rui‐qi Lun, Deng‐xing Hu, Yong‐cheng |
author_sort | Hua, Kun‐chi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the defatting efficacy of high pressure washing and gradient alcohol and biomechanical properties of defatted bone. METHODS: Fresh cancellous bone was obtained from the femoral condyle and divided into six groups according to different defatting treatments, which were: high pressure washing for 10 s (10S group), 20 s (20S group), and 30 s (30S group), gradient alcohol immersion (Alcohol group), acetone immersion (Acetone group), and non‐defatted (Fresh group). The appearance of six groups was observed, and the appearance of defatted bone and fresh bone was compared. The residual lipid content and infrared spectrum were used to compare the efficacy of defatting, the DNA content was used to compare the cell content after defatting, and the maximum stress and elastic modulus were used to compare the effects of defatting treatment on biomechanical properties. RESULTS: The fresh bone was yellow and the pores contained a lot of fat. The defatted bone was white and the porous network was clear. There was no difference in residual lipid content among the three groups with high pressure washing (1.45% ± 0.16%, 1.40% ± 0.13%, and 1.46% ± 0.11%, respectively) (P = 0.828). There was no difference in residual lipid content among the 10S, alcohol, and acetone groups (1.45% ± 0.16%, 1.28% ± 0.07%, and 1.13% ± 0.22%, respectively) (P = 0.125). Infrared spectra showed that the fat content of the five defatting groups was significantly lower than that of the fresh group. There was no difference in residual lipid content among the three groups with high pressure washing (4.53 ± 0.23 ug/mL, 4.61 ± 0.18 ug/mL, and 4.66 ± 0.25 ug/mL, respectively) (P = 0.645). There was no difference in residual lipid content among the 10S, alcohol, and acetone groups (4.53 ± 0.23 ug/mL, 4.29 ± 0.24 ug/mL, and 4.27 ± 0.29 ug/mL, respectively) (P = 0.247). The maximum stress of the bone decreased significantly with the increase of the washing time (9.95 ± 0.31 Mpa, 9.07 ± 0.45 Mpa, and 8.17 ± 0.35 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.003). The elastic modulus of the bone decreased significantly with the increase of the washing time (116.40 ± 3.54 Mpa, 106.10 ± 5.29 Mpa, and 95.63 ± 4.08 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.003). There was no statistical difference in the maximum stress between the fresh group, the 10S group, the alcohol group, and the acetone group (10.09 ± 0.67 Mpa, 9.95 ± 0.31 Mpa, 10.11 ± 0.07 Mpa, and 10.09 ± 0.39 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.963). There was no statistical difference in the maximum stress between the fresh group, the 10S group, the alcohol group and the acetone group (119.93 ± 4.94 Mpa, 116.40 ± 3.54 Mpa, 118.27 ± 0.85 Mpa, 118.10 ± 4.52 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.737). CONCLUSION: The defatting efficiency was satisfactory at a time of 10 s under high pressure washing. In terms of defatting efficiency and its effect on biomechanical properties of bone, high pressure washing and gradient alcohol were similar to conventional acetone solvent extraction defatting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7189055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71890552020-04-29 Assessment of the Defatting Efficacy of Mechanical and Chemical Treatment for Allograft Cancellous Bone and Its Effects on Biomechanics Properties of Bone Hua, Kun‐chi Feng, Jiang‐tao Yang, Xiong‐gang Wang, Feng Zhang, Hao Yang, Li Zhang, Hao‐ran Xu, Ming‐you Li, Ji‐kai Qiao, Rui‐qi Lun, Deng‐xing Hu, Yong‐cheng Orthop Surg Scientific Articles OBJECTIVE: To assess the defatting efficacy of high pressure washing and gradient alcohol and biomechanical properties of defatted bone. METHODS: Fresh cancellous bone was obtained from the femoral condyle and divided into six groups according to different defatting treatments, which were: high pressure washing for 10 s (10S group), 20 s (20S group), and 30 s (30S group), gradient alcohol immersion (Alcohol group), acetone immersion (Acetone group), and non‐defatted (Fresh group). The appearance of six groups was observed, and the appearance of defatted bone and fresh bone was compared. The residual lipid content and infrared spectrum were used to compare the efficacy of defatting, the DNA content was used to compare the cell content after defatting, and the maximum stress and elastic modulus were used to compare the effects of defatting treatment on biomechanical properties. RESULTS: The fresh bone was yellow and the pores contained a lot of fat. The defatted bone was white and the porous network was clear. There was no difference in residual lipid content among the three groups with high pressure washing (1.45% ± 0.16%, 1.40% ± 0.13%, and 1.46% ± 0.11%, respectively) (P = 0.828). There was no difference in residual lipid content among the 10S, alcohol, and acetone groups (1.45% ± 0.16%, 1.28% ± 0.07%, and 1.13% ± 0.22%, respectively) (P = 0.125). Infrared spectra showed that the fat content of the five defatting groups was significantly lower than that of the fresh group. There was no difference in residual lipid content among the three groups with high pressure washing (4.53 ± 0.23 ug/mL, 4.61 ± 0.18 ug/mL, and 4.66 ± 0.25 ug/mL, respectively) (P = 0.645). There was no difference in residual lipid content among the 10S, alcohol, and acetone groups (4.53 ± 0.23 ug/mL, 4.29 ± 0.24 ug/mL, and 4.27 ± 0.29 ug/mL, respectively) (P = 0.247). The maximum stress of the bone decreased significantly with the increase of the washing time (9.95 ± 0.31 Mpa, 9.07 ± 0.45 Mpa, and 8.17 ± 0.35 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.003). The elastic modulus of the bone decreased significantly with the increase of the washing time (116.40 ± 3.54 Mpa, 106.10 ± 5.29 Mpa, and 95.63 ± 4.08 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.003). There was no statistical difference in the maximum stress between the fresh group, the 10S group, the alcohol group, and the acetone group (10.09 ± 0.67 Mpa, 9.95 ± 0.31 Mpa, 10.11 ± 0.07 Mpa, and 10.09 ± 0.39 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.963). There was no statistical difference in the maximum stress between the fresh group, the 10S group, the alcohol group and the acetone group (119.93 ± 4.94 Mpa, 116.40 ± 3.54 Mpa, 118.27 ± 0.85 Mpa, 118.10 ± 4.52 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.737). CONCLUSION: The defatting efficiency was satisfactory at a time of 10 s under high pressure washing. In terms of defatting efficiency and its effect on biomechanical properties of bone, high pressure washing and gradient alcohol were similar to conventional acetone solvent extraction defatting. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7189055/ /pubmed/32189444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12639 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Articles Hua, Kun‐chi Feng, Jiang‐tao Yang, Xiong‐gang Wang, Feng Zhang, Hao Yang, Li Zhang, Hao‐ran Xu, Ming‐you Li, Ji‐kai Qiao, Rui‐qi Lun, Deng‐xing Hu, Yong‐cheng Assessment of the Defatting Efficacy of Mechanical and Chemical Treatment for Allograft Cancellous Bone and Its Effects on Biomechanics Properties of Bone |
title | Assessment of the Defatting Efficacy of Mechanical and Chemical Treatment for Allograft Cancellous Bone and Its Effects on Biomechanics Properties of Bone |
title_full | Assessment of the Defatting Efficacy of Mechanical and Chemical Treatment for Allograft Cancellous Bone and Its Effects on Biomechanics Properties of Bone |
title_fullStr | Assessment of the Defatting Efficacy of Mechanical and Chemical Treatment for Allograft Cancellous Bone and Its Effects on Biomechanics Properties of Bone |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of the Defatting Efficacy of Mechanical and Chemical Treatment for Allograft Cancellous Bone and Its Effects on Biomechanics Properties of Bone |
title_short | Assessment of the Defatting Efficacy of Mechanical and Chemical Treatment for Allograft Cancellous Bone and Its Effects on Biomechanics Properties of Bone |
title_sort | assessment of the defatting efficacy of mechanical and chemical treatment for allograft cancellous bone and its effects on biomechanics properties of bone |
topic | Scientific Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32189444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12639 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huakunchi assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone AT fengjiangtao assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone AT yangxionggang assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone AT wangfeng assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone AT zhanghao assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone AT yangli assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone AT zhanghaoran assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone AT xumingyou assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone AT lijikai assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone AT qiaoruiqi assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone AT lundengxing assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone AT huyongcheng assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone |