Cargando…

Assessment of the Defatting Efficacy of Mechanical and Chemical Treatment for Allograft Cancellous Bone and Its Effects on Biomechanics Properties of Bone

OBJECTIVE: To assess the defatting efficacy of high pressure washing and gradient alcohol and biomechanical properties of defatted bone. METHODS: Fresh cancellous bone was obtained from the femoral condyle and divided into six groups according to different defatting treatments, which were: high pres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hua, Kun‐chi, Feng, Jiang‐tao, Yang, Xiong‐gang, Wang, Feng, Zhang, Hao, Yang, Li, Zhang, Hao‐ran, Xu, Ming‐you, Li, Ji‐kai, Qiao, Rui‐qi, Lun, Deng‐xing, Hu, Yong‐cheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32189444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12639
_version_ 1783527428672454656
author Hua, Kun‐chi
Feng, Jiang‐tao
Yang, Xiong‐gang
Wang, Feng
Zhang, Hao
Yang, Li
Zhang, Hao‐ran
Xu, Ming‐you
Li, Ji‐kai
Qiao, Rui‐qi
Lun, Deng‐xing
Hu, Yong‐cheng
author_facet Hua, Kun‐chi
Feng, Jiang‐tao
Yang, Xiong‐gang
Wang, Feng
Zhang, Hao
Yang, Li
Zhang, Hao‐ran
Xu, Ming‐you
Li, Ji‐kai
Qiao, Rui‐qi
Lun, Deng‐xing
Hu, Yong‐cheng
author_sort Hua, Kun‐chi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the defatting efficacy of high pressure washing and gradient alcohol and biomechanical properties of defatted bone. METHODS: Fresh cancellous bone was obtained from the femoral condyle and divided into six groups according to different defatting treatments, which were: high pressure washing for 10 s (10S group), 20 s (20S group), and 30 s (30S group), gradient alcohol immersion (Alcohol group), acetone immersion (Acetone group), and non‐defatted (Fresh group). The appearance of six groups was observed, and the appearance of defatted bone and fresh bone was compared. The residual lipid content and infrared spectrum were used to compare the efficacy of defatting, the DNA content was used to compare the cell content after defatting, and the maximum stress and elastic modulus were used to compare the effects of defatting treatment on biomechanical properties. RESULTS: The fresh bone was yellow and the pores contained a lot of fat. The defatted bone was white and the porous network was clear. There was no difference in residual lipid content among the three groups with high pressure washing (1.45% ± 0.16%, 1.40% ± 0.13%, and 1.46% ± 0.11%, respectively) (P = 0.828). There was no difference in residual lipid content among the 10S, alcohol, and acetone groups (1.45% ± 0.16%, 1.28% ± 0.07%, and 1.13% ± 0.22%, respectively) (P = 0.125). Infrared spectra showed that the fat content of the five defatting groups was significantly lower than that of the fresh group. There was no difference in residual lipid content among the three groups with high pressure washing (4.53 ± 0.23 ug/mL, 4.61 ± 0.18 ug/mL, and 4.66 ± 0.25 ug/mL, respectively) (P = 0.645). There was no difference in residual lipid content among the 10S, alcohol, and acetone groups (4.53 ± 0.23 ug/mL, 4.29 ± 0.24 ug/mL, and 4.27 ± 0.29 ug/mL, respectively) (P = 0.247). The maximum stress of the bone decreased significantly with the increase of the washing time (9.95 ± 0.31 Mpa, 9.07 ± 0.45 Mpa, and 8.17 ± 0.35 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.003). The elastic modulus of the bone decreased significantly with the increase of the washing time (116.40 ± 3.54 Mpa, 106.10 ± 5.29 Mpa, and 95.63 ± 4.08 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.003). There was no statistical difference in the maximum stress between the fresh group, the 10S group, the alcohol group, and the acetone group (10.09 ± 0.67 Mpa, 9.95 ± 0.31 Mpa, 10.11 ± 0.07 Mpa, and 10.09 ± 0.39 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.963). There was no statistical difference in the maximum stress between the fresh group, the 10S group, the alcohol group and the acetone group (119.93 ± 4.94 Mpa, 116.40 ± 3.54 Mpa, 118.27 ± 0.85 Mpa, 118.10 ± 4.52 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.737). CONCLUSION: The defatting efficiency was satisfactory at a time of 10 s under high pressure washing. In terms of defatting efficiency and its effect on biomechanical properties of bone, high pressure washing and gradient alcohol were similar to conventional acetone solvent extraction defatting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7189055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71890552020-04-29 Assessment of the Defatting Efficacy of Mechanical and Chemical Treatment for Allograft Cancellous Bone and Its Effects on Biomechanics Properties of Bone Hua, Kun‐chi Feng, Jiang‐tao Yang, Xiong‐gang Wang, Feng Zhang, Hao Yang, Li Zhang, Hao‐ran Xu, Ming‐you Li, Ji‐kai Qiao, Rui‐qi Lun, Deng‐xing Hu, Yong‐cheng Orthop Surg Scientific Articles OBJECTIVE: To assess the defatting efficacy of high pressure washing and gradient alcohol and biomechanical properties of defatted bone. METHODS: Fresh cancellous bone was obtained from the femoral condyle and divided into six groups according to different defatting treatments, which were: high pressure washing for 10 s (10S group), 20 s (20S group), and 30 s (30S group), gradient alcohol immersion (Alcohol group), acetone immersion (Acetone group), and non‐defatted (Fresh group). The appearance of six groups was observed, and the appearance of defatted bone and fresh bone was compared. The residual lipid content and infrared spectrum were used to compare the efficacy of defatting, the DNA content was used to compare the cell content after defatting, and the maximum stress and elastic modulus were used to compare the effects of defatting treatment on biomechanical properties. RESULTS: The fresh bone was yellow and the pores contained a lot of fat. The defatted bone was white and the porous network was clear. There was no difference in residual lipid content among the three groups with high pressure washing (1.45% ± 0.16%, 1.40% ± 0.13%, and 1.46% ± 0.11%, respectively) (P = 0.828). There was no difference in residual lipid content among the 10S, alcohol, and acetone groups (1.45% ± 0.16%, 1.28% ± 0.07%, and 1.13% ± 0.22%, respectively) (P = 0.125). Infrared spectra showed that the fat content of the five defatting groups was significantly lower than that of the fresh group. There was no difference in residual lipid content among the three groups with high pressure washing (4.53 ± 0.23 ug/mL, 4.61 ± 0.18 ug/mL, and 4.66 ± 0.25 ug/mL, respectively) (P = 0.645). There was no difference in residual lipid content among the 10S, alcohol, and acetone groups (4.53 ± 0.23 ug/mL, 4.29 ± 0.24 ug/mL, and 4.27 ± 0.29 ug/mL, respectively) (P = 0.247). The maximum stress of the bone decreased significantly with the increase of the washing time (9.95 ± 0.31 Mpa, 9.07 ± 0.45 Mpa, and 8.17 ± 0.35 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.003). The elastic modulus of the bone decreased significantly with the increase of the washing time (116.40 ± 3.54 Mpa, 106.10 ± 5.29 Mpa, and 95.63 ± 4.08 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.003). There was no statistical difference in the maximum stress between the fresh group, the 10S group, the alcohol group, and the acetone group (10.09 ± 0.67 Mpa, 9.95 ± 0.31 Mpa, 10.11 ± 0.07 Mpa, and 10.09 ± 0.39 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.963). There was no statistical difference in the maximum stress between the fresh group, the 10S group, the alcohol group and the acetone group (119.93 ± 4.94 Mpa, 116.40 ± 3.54 Mpa, 118.27 ± 0.85 Mpa, 118.10 ± 4.52 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.737). CONCLUSION: The defatting efficiency was satisfactory at a time of 10 s under high pressure washing. In terms of defatting efficiency and its effect on biomechanical properties of bone, high pressure washing and gradient alcohol were similar to conventional acetone solvent extraction defatting. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7189055/ /pubmed/32189444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12639 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Scientific Articles
Hua, Kun‐chi
Feng, Jiang‐tao
Yang, Xiong‐gang
Wang, Feng
Zhang, Hao
Yang, Li
Zhang, Hao‐ran
Xu, Ming‐you
Li, Ji‐kai
Qiao, Rui‐qi
Lun, Deng‐xing
Hu, Yong‐cheng
Assessment of the Defatting Efficacy of Mechanical and Chemical Treatment for Allograft Cancellous Bone and Its Effects on Biomechanics Properties of Bone
title Assessment of the Defatting Efficacy of Mechanical and Chemical Treatment for Allograft Cancellous Bone and Its Effects on Biomechanics Properties of Bone
title_full Assessment of the Defatting Efficacy of Mechanical and Chemical Treatment for Allograft Cancellous Bone and Its Effects on Biomechanics Properties of Bone
title_fullStr Assessment of the Defatting Efficacy of Mechanical and Chemical Treatment for Allograft Cancellous Bone and Its Effects on Biomechanics Properties of Bone
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the Defatting Efficacy of Mechanical and Chemical Treatment for Allograft Cancellous Bone and Its Effects on Biomechanics Properties of Bone
title_short Assessment of the Defatting Efficacy of Mechanical and Chemical Treatment for Allograft Cancellous Bone and Its Effects on Biomechanics Properties of Bone
title_sort assessment of the defatting efficacy of mechanical and chemical treatment for allograft cancellous bone and its effects on biomechanics properties of bone
topic Scientific Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32189444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12639
work_keys_str_mv AT huakunchi assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone
AT fengjiangtao assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone
AT yangxionggang assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone
AT wangfeng assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone
AT zhanghao assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone
AT yangli assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone
AT zhanghaoran assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone
AT xumingyou assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone
AT lijikai assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone
AT qiaoruiqi assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone
AT lundengxing assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone
AT huyongcheng assessmentofthedefattingefficacyofmechanicalandchemicaltreatmentforallograftcancellousboneanditseffectsonbiomechanicspropertiesofbone