Cargando…
Reframe policymaking dysfunction through bipartisan-inclusion leadership
Persistent policy failures have been examined in recent years with a focus on the role of political systems. We evaluate the growth of dysfunctional policymaking in the U.S. and propose a countering approach. Policy failures often reflect partisan policy stalemate, errors or unintended consequences,...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32351255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09383-2 |
_version_ | 1783527450731347968 |
---|---|
author | Straka, John W. Straka, Brenda C. |
author_facet | Straka, John W. Straka, Brenda C. |
author_sort | Straka, John W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Persistent policy failures have been examined in recent years with a focus on the role of political systems. We evaluate the growth of dysfunctional policymaking in the U.S. and propose a countering approach. Policy failures often reflect partisan policy stalemate, errors or unintended consequences, polarized extremism or imbalance, or partisan reversals with changes in power. Extremes in partisanship are not new historically, but growing policy failures due to negative partisanship have now severely damaged public trust. More “party blind” conditions in policy formulation may be able to renew a more productive social contract. We propose a disruptive presidential leadership approach of bipartisan inclusion to seek to reframe the partisan divides, counter negative partisanship and extremes, re-establish better policymaking interactions, and improve governance and policy outcomes. Dysfunctional policymaking has been attributed to Republicans and Democrats in a Prisoner’s Dilemma. Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemmas often lead to higher rates of cooperation, and similarly, historical policymaking included greater cooperation, but in recent decades the bipartisan norms of governance have substantially eroded. We describe three complementary explanations, which suggest that non-cooperative partisan policymaking has become self-reinforcing, and institutional changes to promote cooperation should focus on lowering the risk-adjusted cost–benefit ratio, making cooperation safer and more attractive for policymakers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7189180 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71891802020-04-29 Reframe policymaking dysfunction through bipartisan-inclusion leadership Straka, John W. Straka, Brenda C. Policy Sci Discussion and Commentary Persistent policy failures have been examined in recent years with a focus on the role of political systems. We evaluate the growth of dysfunctional policymaking in the U.S. and propose a countering approach. Policy failures often reflect partisan policy stalemate, errors or unintended consequences, polarized extremism or imbalance, or partisan reversals with changes in power. Extremes in partisanship are not new historically, but growing policy failures due to negative partisanship have now severely damaged public trust. More “party blind” conditions in policy formulation may be able to renew a more productive social contract. We propose a disruptive presidential leadership approach of bipartisan inclusion to seek to reframe the partisan divides, counter negative partisanship and extremes, re-establish better policymaking interactions, and improve governance and policy outcomes. Dysfunctional policymaking has been attributed to Republicans and Democrats in a Prisoner’s Dilemma. Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemmas often lead to higher rates of cooperation, and similarly, historical policymaking included greater cooperation, but in recent decades the bipartisan norms of governance have substantially eroded. We describe three complementary explanations, which suggest that non-cooperative partisan policymaking has become self-reinforcing, and institutional changes to promote cooperation should focus on lowering the risk-adjusted cost–benefit ratio, making cooperation safer and more attractive for policymakers. Springer US 2020-04-29 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7189180/ /pubmed/32351255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09383-2 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Discussion and Commentary Straka, John W. Straka, Brenda C. Reframe policymaking dysfunction through bipartisan-inclusion leadership |
title | Reframe policymaking dysfunction through bipartisan-inclusion leadership |
title_full | Reframe policymaking dysfunction through bipartisan-inclusion leadership |
title_fullStr | Reframe policymaking dysfunction through bipartisan-inclusion leadership |
title_full_unstemmed | Reframe policymaking dysfunction through bipartisan-inclusion leadership |
title_short | Reframe policymaking dysfunction through bipartisan-inclusion leadership |
title_sort | reframe policymaking dysfunction through bipartisan-inclusion leadership |
topic | Discussion and Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32351255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09383-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strakajohnw reframepolicymakingdysfunctionthroughbipartisaninclusionleadership AT strakabrendac reframepolicymakingdysfunctionthroughbipartisaninclusionleadership |