Cargando…

Motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic orofacial pain syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Invasive motor Cortex Stimulation (iMCS) was introduced in the 1990’s for the treatment of chronic neuropathic orofacial pain (CNOP), although its effectiveness remains doubtful. However, CNOP is known to be a heterogeneous group of orofacial pain disorders, which can lead to different responses to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henssen, Dylan, Kurt, Erkan, van Walsum, Anne-Marie Van Cappellen, Kozicz, Tamas, van Dongen, Robert, Bartels, Ronald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32346080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64177-z
_version_ 1783527464428896256
author Henssen, Dylan
Kurt, Erkan
van Walsum, Anne-Marie Van Cappellen
Kozicz, Tamas
van Dongen, Robert
Bartels, Ronald
author_facet Henssen, Dylan
Kurt, Erkan
van Walsum, Anne-Marie Van Cappellen
Kozicz, Tamas
van Dongen, Robert
Bartels, Ronald
author_sort Henssen, Dylan
collection PubMed
description Invasive motor Cortex Stimulation (iMCS) was introduced in the 1990’s for the treatment of chronic neuropathic orofacial pain (CNOP), although its effectiveness remains doubtful. However, CNOP is known to be a heterogeneous group of orofacial pain disorders, which can lead to different responses to iMCS. Therefore, this paper investigated (1) whether the effectiveness of iMCS is significantly different among different CNOP disorders and (2) whether other confounding factors can be impacting iMCS results in CNOP. A systematic review and meta-analysis using a linear mixed-model was performed. Twenty-three papers were included, totaling 140 CNOP patients. Heterogeneity of the studies showed to be 55.8%. A visual analogue scale (VAS) measured median pain relief of 66.5% (ranging from 0–100%) was found. Linear mixed-model analysis showed that patients suffering from trigeminal neuralgia responded significantly more favorable to iMCS than patients suffering from dysfunctional pain syndromes (p = 0.030). Also, patients suffering from CNOP caused by (supra)nuclear lesions responded marginally significantly better to iMCS than patients suffering from CNOP due to trigeminal nerve lesions (p = 0.049). No other confounding factors were elucidated. This meta-analysis showed that patients suffering from trigeminal neuralgia and patients suffering from (supra)nuclear lesions causing CNOP responded significantly more favorable than others on iMCS. No other confounding factors were found relevant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7189245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71892452020-05-04 Motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic orofacial pain syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Henssen, Dylan Kurt, Erkan van Walsum, Anne-Marie Van Cappellen Kozicz, Tamas van Dongen, Robert Bartels, Ronald Sci Rep Article Invasive motor Cortex Stimulation (iMCS) was introduced in the 1990’s for the treatment of chronic neuropathic orofacial pain (CNOP), although its effectiveness remains doubtful. However, CNOP is known to be a heterogeneous group of orofacial pain disorders, which can lead to different responses to iMCS. Therefore, this paper investigated (1) whether the effectiveness of iMCS is significantly different among different CNOP disorders and (2) whether other confounding factors can be impacting iMCS results in CNOP. A systematic review and meta-analysis using a linear mixed-model was performed. Twenty-three papers were included, totaling 140 CNOP patients. Heterogeneity of the studies showed to be 55.8%. A visual analogue scale (VAS) measured median pain relief of 66.5% (ranging from 0–100%) was found. Linear mixed-model analysis showed that patients suffering from trigeminal neuralgia responded significantly more favorable to iMCS than patients suffering from dysfunctional pain syndromes (p = 0.030). Also, patients suffering from CNOP caused by (supra)nuclear lesions responded marginally significantly better to iMCS than patients suffering from CNOP due to trigeminal nerve lesions (p = 0.049). No other confounding factors were elucidated. This meta-analysis showed that patients suffering from trigeminal neuralgia and patients suffering from (supra)nuclear lesions causing CNOP responded significantly more favorable than others on iMCS. No other confounding factors were found relevant. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7189245/ /pubmed/32346080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64177-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Henssen, Dylan
Kurt, Erkan
van Walsum, Anne-Marie Van Cappellen
Kozicz, Tamas
van Dongen, Robert
Bartels, Ronald
Motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic orofacial pain syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic orofacial pain syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic orofacial pain syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic orofacial pain syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic orofacial pain syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic orofacial pain syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic orofacial pain syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32346080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64177-z
work_keys_str_mv AT henssendylan motorcortexstimulationinchronicneuropathicorofacialpainsyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kurterkan motorcortexstimulationinchronicneuropathicorofacialpainsyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vanwalsumannemarievancappellen motorcortexstimulationinchronicneuropathicorofacialpainsyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kozicztamas motorcortexstimulationinchronicneuropathicorofacialpainsyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vandongenrobert motorcortexstimulationinchronicneuropathicorofacialpainsyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bartelsronald motorcortexstimulationinchronicneuropathicorofacialpainsyndromesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis