Cargando…

Image Quality and Dose Comparison of Single-Energy CT (SECT) and Dual-Energy CT (DECT)

CT and its comprehensive usage have become one of the most indispensable components in medical field especially in the diagnosis of several diseases. SECT and DECT have developed CT diagnostic potentials in several means. In this review article we have discussed the basic principles of single-energy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghasemi Shayan, Ramin, Oladghaffari, Maryam, Sajjadian, Fakhrosadat, Fazel Ghaziyani, Mona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32373363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1403957
_version_ 1783527475927580672
author Ghasemi Shayan, Ramin
Oladghaffari, Maryam
Sajjadian, Fakhrosadat
Fazel Ghaziyani, Mona
author_facet Ghasemi Shayan, Ramin
Oladghaffari, Maryam
Sajjadian, Fakhrosadat
Fazel Ghaziyani, Mona
author_sort Ghasemi Shayan, Ramin
collection PubMed
description CT and its comprehensive usage have become one of the most indispensable components in medical field especially in the diagnosis of several diseases. SECT and DECT have developed CT diagnostic potentials in several means. In this review article we have discussed the basic principles of single-energy and dual-energy computed tomography and their important physical differences which can cause better diagnostic evaluation. Moreover, different organs diagnostic evaluations through single-energy and dual-energy computed tomography have been discussed. Conventional or single-energy CT (SECT) uses a single polychromatic X-ray beam (ranging from 70 to 140 kVp with a standard of 120 kVp) emitted from a single source and received by a single detector. The concept of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is almost as old as the CT technology itself; DECT initially required substantially higher radiation doses (nearly two times higher than those employed in single-energy CT) and presented problems associated with spatial misregistration of the two different kV image datasets between the two separate acquisitions. The basic principles of single-energy and dual-energy computed tomography and their important physical differences can cause better diagnostic evaluation. Moreover, different organs diagnostic evaluations through single-energy and dual-energy computed tomography have been discussed. According to diverse data and statistics it is controversial to definitely indicate the accurate comparison of image quality and dose amount.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7189324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71893242020-05-05 Image Quality and Dose Comparison of Single-Energy CT (SECT) and Dual-Energy CT (DECT) Ghasemi Shayan, Ramin Oladghaffari, Maryam Sajjadian, Fakhrosadat Fazel Ghaziyani, Mona Radiol Res Pract Review Article CT and its comprehensive usage have become one of the most indispensable components in medical field especially in the diagnosis of several diseases. SECT and DECT have developed CT diagnostic potentials in several means. In this review article we have discussed the basic principles of single-energy and dual-energy computed tomography and their important physical differences which can cause better diagnostic evaluation. Moreover, different organs diagnostic evaluations through single-energy and dual-energy computed tomography have been discussed. Conventional or single-energy CT (SECT) uses a single polychromatic X-ray beam (ranging from 70 to 140 kVp with a standard of 120 kVp) emitted from a single source and received by a single detector. The concept of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is almost as old as the CT technology itself; DECT initially required substantially higher radiation doses (nearly two times higher than those employed in single-energy CT) and presented problems associated with spatial misregistration of the two different kV image datasets between the two separate acquisitions. The basic principles of single-energy and dual-energy computed tomography and their important physical differences can cause better diagnostic evaluation. Moreover, different organs diagnostic evaluations through single-energy and dual-energy computed tomography have been discussed. According to diverse data and statistics it is controversial to definitely indicate the accurate comparison of image quality and dose amount. Hindawi 2020-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7189324/ /pubmed/32373363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1403957 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ramin Ghasemi Shayan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Ghasemi Shayan, Ramin
Oladghaffari, Maryam
Sajjadian, Fakhrosadat
Fazel Ghaziyani, Mona
Image Quality and Dose Comparison of Single-Energy CT (SECT) and Dual-Energy CT (DECT)
title Image Quality and Dose Comparison of Single-Energy CT (SECT) and Dual-Energy CT (DECT)
title_full Image Quality and Dose Comparison of Single-Energy CT (SECT) and Dual-Energy CT (DECT)
title_fullStr Image Quality and Dose Comparison of Single-Energy CT (SECT) and Dual-Energy CT (DECT)
title_full_unstemmed Image Quality and Dose Comparison of Single-Energy CT (SECT) and Dual-Energy CT (DECT)
title_short Image Quality and Dose Comparison of Single-Energy CT (SECT) and Dual-Energy CT (DECT)
title_sort image quality and dose comparison of single-energy ct (sect) and dual-energy ct (dect)
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32373363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1403957
work_keys_str_mv AT ghasemishayanramin imagequalityanddosecomparisonofsingleenergyctsectanddualenergyctdect
AT oladghaffarimaryam imagequalityanddosecomparisonofsingleenergyctsectanddualenergyctdect
AT sajjadianfakhrosadat imagequalityanddosecomparisonofsingleenergyctsectanddualenergyctdect
AT fazelghaziyanimona imagequalityanddosecomparisonofsingleenergyctsectanddualenergyctdect