Cargando…

The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma After Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Purpose: Although the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) for upper tract urinary carcinoma (UTUC) has been reported, there is a lack of consensus regarding the prognostic factor of LVI in UTUC after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The aim of the present study was to e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Lijin, Wu, Bin, Zha, Zhenlei, Zhao, Hu, Yuan, Jun, Feng, Yejun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32391257
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00487
_version_ 1783527491627909120
author Zhang, Lijin
Wu, Bin
Zha, Zhenlei
Zhao, Hu
Yuan, Jun
Feng, Yejun
author_facet Zhang, Lijin
Wu, Bin
Zha, Zhenlei
Zhao, Hu
Yuan, Jun
Feng, Yejun
author_sort Zhang, Lijin
collection PubMed
description Background and Purpose: Although the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) for upper tract urinary carcinoma (UTUC) has been reported, there is a lack of consensus regarding the prognostic factor of LVI in UTUC after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the contemporary role of LVI using systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we performed a systematic search of Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE for all reports published up to July 2019. Cumulative analyses of hazard ratios (HRs)/odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were conducted to assess the association between LVI and oncological outcomes and clinicopathological features. Results: Our meta-analysis included 31 eligible studies containing 14,653 patients with UTUC (81–1,363 per study). Our results indicated a significant correlation of LVI with worse cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.59, p < 0.001), overall survival (HR = 1.55, p < 0.001), recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.46, p < 0.001), cancer-specific mortality (HR = 1.25, p = 0.047), and recurrence (HR = 1.23, p = 0.026). LVI was also correlated with advanced tumor stage (III/IV vs. I/II: OR = 7.63, p < 0.001), higher tumor grade (3 vs. 1/2: OR = 5.61, p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (yes vs. no: OR = 4.95, p < 0.001), carcinoma in situ (yes vs. no: OR = 1.92, p < 0.001), and positive surgical margin (yes vs. no: OR = 4.38, p < 0.001), but not related to gender (male vs. female: OR = 0.98, p = 0.825), and multifocality (multifocal vs. unifocal: OR = 1.09, p = 0.555). The funnel plot test indicated no significant publication bias. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that LVI was associated with aggressive clinicopathological features. LVI may serve as a poor prognostic factor for patients with UTUC after RNU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7189418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71894182020-05-08 The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma After Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhang, Lijin Wu, Bin Zha, Zhenlei Zhao, Hu Yuan, Jun Feng, Yejun Front Oncol Oncology Background and Purpose: Although the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) for upper tract urinary carcinoma (UTUC) has been reported, there is a lack of consensus regarding the prognostic factor of LVI in UTUC after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the contemporary role of LVI using systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we performed a systematic search of Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE for all reports published up to July 2019. Cumulative analyses of hazard ratios (HRs)/odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were conducted to assess the association between LVI and oncological outcomes and clinicopathological features. Results: Our meta-analysis included 31 eligible studies containing 14,653 patients with UTUC (81–1,363 per study). Our results indicated a significant correlation of LVI with worse cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.59, p < 0.001), overall survival (HR = 1.55, p < 0.001), recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.46, p < 0.001), cancer-specific mortality (HR = 1.25, p = 0.047), and recurrence (HR = 1.23, p = 0.026). LVI was also correlated with advanced tumor stage (III/IV vs. I/II: OR = 7.63, p < 0.001), higher tumor grade (3 vs. 1/2: OR = 5.61, p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (yes vs. no: OR = 4.95, p < 0.001), carcinoma in situ (yes vs. no: OR = 1.92, p < 0.001), and positive surgical margin (yes vs. no: OR = 4.38, p < 0.001), but not related to gender (male vs. female: OR = 0.98, p = 0.825), and multifocality (multifocal vs. unifocal: OR = 1.09, p = 0.555). The funnel plot test indicated no significant publication bias. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that LVI was associated with aggressive clinicopathological features. LVI may serve as a poor prognostic factor for patients with UTUC after RNU. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7189418/ /pubmed/32391257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00487 Text en Copyright © 2020 Zhang, Wu, Zha, Zhao, Yuan and Feng. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zhang, Lijin
Wu, Bin
Zha, Zhenlei
Zhao, Hu
Yuan, Jun
Feng, Yejun
The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma After Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma After Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma After Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma After Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma After Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma After Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in patients with upper tract urinary carcinoma after surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32391257
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00487
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanglijin theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wubin theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhazhenlei theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaohu theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuanjun theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fengyejun theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanglijin prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wubin prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhazhenlei prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaohu prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuanjun prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fengyejun prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis