Cargando…
The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma After Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background and Purpose: Although the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) for upper tract urinary carcinoma (UTUC) has been reported, there is a lack of consensus regarding the prognostic factor of LVI in UTUC after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The aim of the present study was to e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32391257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00487 |
_version_ | 1783527491627909120 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Lijin Wu, Bin Zha, Zhenlei Zhao, Hu Yuan, Jun Feng, Yejun |
author_facet | Zhang, Lijin Wu, Bin Zha, Zhenlei Zhao, Hu Yuan, Jun Feng, Yejun |
author_sort | Zhang, Lijin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Purpose: Although the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) for upper tract urinary carcinoma (UTUC) has been reported, there is a lack of consensus regarding the prognostic factor of LVI in UTUC after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the contemporary role of LVI using systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we performed a systematic search of Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE for all reports published up to July 2019. Cumulative analyses of hazard ratios (HRs)/odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were conducted to assess the association between LVI and oncological outcomes and clinicopathological features. Results: Our meta-analysis included 31 eligible studies containing 14,653 patients with UTUC (81–1,363 per study). Our results indicated a significant correlation of LVI with worse cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.59, p < 0.001), overall survival (HR = 1.55, p < 0.001), recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.46, p < 0.001), cancer-specific mortality (HR = 1.25, p = 0.047), and recurrence (HR = 1.23, p = 0.026). LVI was also correlated with advanced tumor stage (III/IV vs. I/II: OR = 7.63, p < 0.001), higher tumor grade (3 vs. 1/2: OR = 5.61, p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (yes vs. no: OR = 4.95, p < 0.001), carcinoma in situ (yes vs. no: OR = 1.92, p < 0.001), and positive surgical margin (yes vs. no: OR = 4.38, p < 0.001), but not related to gender (male vs. female: OR = 0.98, p = 0.825), and multifocality (multifocal vs. unifocal: OR = 1.09, p = 0.555). The funnel plot test indicated no significant publication bias. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that LVI was associated with aggressive clinicopathological features. LVI may serve as a poor prognostic factor for patients with UTUC after RNU. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7189418 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71894182020-05-08 The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma After Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhang, Lijin Wu, Bin Zha, Zhenlei Zhao, Hu Yuan, Jun Feng, Yejun Front Oncol Oncology Background and Purpose: Although the prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) for upper tract urinary carcinoma (UTUC) has been reported, there is a lack of consensus regarding the prognostic factor of LVI in UTUC after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the contemporary role of LVI using systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we performed a systematic search of Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE for all reports published up to July 2019. Cumulative analyses of hazard ratios (HRs)/odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were conducted to assess the association between LVI and oncological outcomes and clinicopathological features. Results: Our meta-analysis included 31 eligible studies containing 14,653 patients with UTUC (81–1,363 per study). Our results indicated a significant correlation of LVI with worse cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.59, p < 0.001), overall survival (HR = 1.55, p < 0.001), recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.46, p < 0.001), cancer-specific mortality (HR = 1.25, p = 0.047), and recurrence (HR = 1.23, p = 0.026). LVI was also correlated with advanced tumor stage (III/IV vs. I/II: OR = 7.63, p < 0.001), higher tumor grade (3 vs. 1/2: OR = 5.61, p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (yes vs. no: OR = 4.95, p < 0.001), carcinoma in situ (yes vs. no: OR = 1.92, p < 0.001), and positive surgical margin (yes vs. no: OR = 4.38, p < 0.001), but not related to gender (male vs. female: OR = 0.98, p = 0.825), and multifocality (multifocal vs. unifocal: OR = 1.09, p = 0.555). The funnel plot test indicated no significant publication bias. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that LVI was associated with aggressive clinicopathological features. LVI may serve as a poor prognostic factor for patients with UTUC after RNU. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7189418/ /pubmed/32391257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00487 Text en Copyright © 2020 Zhang, Wu, Zha, Zhao, Yuan and Feng. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Zhang, Lijin Wu, Bin Zha, Zhenlei Zhao, Hu Yuan, Jun Feng, Yejun The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma After Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma After Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma After Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma After Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma After Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Patients With Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma After Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in patients with upper tract urinary carcinoma after surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32391257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00487 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanglijin theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wubin theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhazhenlei theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhaohu theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuanjun theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fengyejun theprognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanglijin prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wubin prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhazhenlei prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhaohu prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuanjun prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fengyejun prognosticvalueoflymphovascularinvasioninpatientswithuppertracturinarycarcinomaaftersurgeryanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |