Cargando…

Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation

BACKGROUND: Cancer trials often incorporate intensive imaging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography with Computerised Tomography (PET/CT), which can be physically and mentally exhausting for patients. This questionnaire study aimed to determine the aspects of imaging...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: May, Katherine, Lee, Martin, Jefford, Monica, Ribeiro, Ana, Macdonald, Alison, Morgan, Veronica, Usher, Marianne, de Souza, Nandita M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32368349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00195-5
_version_ 1783527518986305536
author May, Katherine
Lee, Martin
Jefford, Monica
Ribeiro, Ana
Macdonald, Alison
Morgan, Veronica
Usher, Marianne
de Souza, Nandita M.
author_facet May, Katherine
Lee, Martin
Jefford, Monica
Ribeiro, Ana
Macdonald, Alison
Morgan, Veronica
Usher, Marianne
de Souza, Nandita M.
author_sort May, Katherine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cancer trials often incorporate intensive imaging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography with Computerised Tomography (PET/CT), which can be physically and mentally exhausting for patients. This questionnaire study aimed to determine the aspects of imaging that affect a patient’s decision to participate in clinical trials in order to inform the design of future trials that utilise imaging. This should achieve greater patient compliance and improve the patient experience. METHOD: A detailed questionnaire assessing patient expectation and acceptability of imaging within clinical trials was developed in collaboration with two patient representatives. The questionnaire addressed the influence of scan type, length, frequency, scheduling, invasiveness and staff support on acceptability of imaging. It was applied to three patient groups. Group 1 consisted of patients newly recruited to studies with imaging, Group 2 consisted of previous participants in studies with imaging and Group 3 consisted of patients having imaging for clinical care. RESULTS: One hundred ninety six patients completed the questionnaires (Group 1:47; Group 2: 50 and Group 3: 99). The use of ionising radiation and number of scans required were identified as negative influences on decision to participate by 25% of Group 3 but only by 6% of Groups 1 and 2. Scan duration >30mins was perceived as a negative factor for decision to participate by all Groups (12–22%). Good communication provided by researchers in terms of discussing the study before and after reading study materials was a key factor in influencing decision to participate (> 50% in Groups 1 and 2 and > 20% in Group 3). CONCLUSION: Factors relating to imaging procedures within clinical trials that affect participation have been identified with communication around study materials as the key determinant. These data will be used to influence the development of future research protocols. Modification of imaging requirements within clinical trials will improve patient tolerance and acceptability and is likely to raise recruitment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7189543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71895432020-05-04 Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation May, Katherine Lee, Martin Jefford, Monica Ribeiro, Ana Macdonald, Alison Morgan, Veronica Usher, Marianne de Souza, Nandita M. Res Involv Engagem Research Article BACKGROUND: Cancer trials often incorporate intensive imaging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography with Computerised Tomography (PET/CT), which can be physically and mentally exhausting for patients. This questionnaire study aimed to determine the aspects of imaging that affect a patient’s decision to participate in clinical trials in order to inform the design of future trials that utilise imaging. This should achieve greater patient compliance and improve the patient experience. METHOD: A detailed questionnaire assessing patient expectation and acceptability of imaging within clinical trials was developed in collaboration with two patient representatives. The questionnaire addressed the influence of scan type, length, frequency, scheduling, invasiveness and staff support on acceptability of imaging. It was applied to three patient groups. Group 1 consisted of patients newly recruited to studies with imaging, Group 2 consisted of previous participants in studies with imaging and Group 3 consisted of patients having imaging for clinical care. RESULTS: One hundred ninety six patients completed the questionnaires (Group 1:47; Group 2: 50 and Group 3: 99). The use of ionising radiation and number of scans required were identified as negative influences on decision to participate by 25% of Group 3 but only by 6% of Groups 1 and 2. Scan duration >30mins was perceived as a negative factor for decision to participate by all Groups (12–22%). Good communication provided by researchers in terms of discussing the study before and after reading study materials was a key factor in influencing decision to participate (> 50% in Groups 1 and 2 and > 20% in Group 3). CONCLUSION: Factors relating to imaging procedures within clinical trials that affect participation have been identified with communication around study materials as the key determinant. These data will be used to influence the development of future research protocols. Modification of imaging requirements within clinical trials will improve patient tolerance and acceptability and is likely to raise recruitment. BioMed Central 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7189543/ /pubmed/32368349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00195-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
May, Katherine
Lee, Martin
Jefford, Monica
Ribeiro, Ana
Macdonald, Alison
Morgan, Veronica
Usher, Marianne
de Souza, Nandita M.
Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation
title Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation
title_full Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation
title_fullStr Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation
title_full_unstemmed Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation
title_short Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation
title_sort imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32368349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00195-5
work_keys_str_mv AT maykatherine imaginginclinicaltrialsapatientledquestionnairestudytoassessimpactofimagingregimesonpatientparticipation
AT leemartin imaginginclinicaltrialsapatientledquestionnairestudytoassessimpactofimagingregimesonpatientparticipation
AT jeffordmonica imaginginclinicaltrialsapatientledquestionnairestudytoassessimpactofimagingregimesonpatientparticipation
AT ribeiroana imaginginclinicaltrialsapatientledquestionnairestudytoassessimpactofimagingregimesonpatientparticipation
AT macdonaldalison imaginginclinicaltrialsapatientledquestionnairestudytoassessimpactofimagingregimesonpatientparticipation
AT morganveronica imaginginclinicaltrialsapatientledquestionnairestudytoassessimpactofimagingregimesonpatientparticipation
AT ushermarianne imaginginclinicaltrialsapatientledquestionnairestudytoassessimpactofimagingregimesonpatientparticipation
AT desouzananditam imaginginclinicaltrialsapatientledquestionnairestudytoassessimpactofimagingregimesonpatientparticipation