Cargando…
Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation
BACKGROUND: Cancer trials often incorporate intensive imaging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography with Computerised Tomography (PET/CT), which can be physically and mentally exhausting for patients. This questionnaire study aimed to determine the aspects of imaging...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32368349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00195-5 |
_version_ | 1783527518986305536 |
---|---|
author | May, Katherine Lee, Martin Jefford, Monica Ribeiro, Ana Macdonald, Alison Morgan, Veronica Usher, Marianne de Souza, Nandita M. |
author_facet | May, Katherine Lee, Martin Jefford, Monica Ribeiro, Ana Macdonald, Alison Morgan, Veronica Usher, Marianne de Souza, Nandita M. |
author_sort | May, Katherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cancer trials often incorporate intensive imaging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography with Computerised Tomography (PET/CT), which can be physically and mentally exhausting for patients. This questionnaire study aimed to determine the aspects of imaging that affect a patient’s decision to participate in clinical trials in order to inform the design of future trials that utilise imaging. This should achieve greater patient compliance and improve the patient experience. METHOD: A detailed questionnaire assessing patient expectation and acceptability of imaging within clinical trials was developed in collaboration with two patient representatives. The questionnaire addressed the influence of scan type, length, frequency, scheduling, invasiveness and staff support on acceptability of imaging. It was applied to three patient groups. Group 1 consisted of patients newly recruited to studies with imaging, Group 2 consisted of previous participants in studies with imaging and Group 3 consisted of patients having imaging for clinical care. RESULTS: One hundred ninety six patients completed the questionnaires (Group 1:47; Group 2: 50 and Group 3: 99). The use of ionising radiation and number of scans required were identified as negative influences on decision to participate by 25% of Group 3 but only by 6% of Groups 1 and 2. Scan duration >30mins was perceived as a negative factor for decision to participate by all Groups (12–22%). Good communication provided by researchers in terms of discussing the study before and after reading study materials was a key factor in influencing decision to participate (> 50% in Groups 1 and 2 and > 20% in Group 3). CONCLUSION: Factors relating to imaging procedures within clinical trials that affect participation have been identified with communication around study materials as the key determinant. These data will be used to influence the development of future research protocols. Modification of imaging requirements within clinical trials will improve patient tolerance and acceptability and is likely to raise recruitment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7189543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71895432020-05-04 Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation May, Katherine Lee, Martin Jefford, Monica Ribeiro, Ana Macdonald, Alison Morgan, Veronica Usher, Marianne de Souza, Nandita M. Res Involv Engagem Research Article BACKGROUND: Cancer trials often incorporate intensive imaging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography with Computerised Tomography (PET/CT), which can be physically and mentally exhausting for patients. This questionnaire study aimed to determine the aspects of imaging that affect a patient’s decision to participate in clinical trials in order to inform the design of future trials that utilise imaging. This should achieve greater patient compliance and improve the patient experience. METHOD: A detailed questionnaire assessing patient expectation and acceptability of imaging within clinical trials was developed in collaboration with two patient representatives. The questionnaire addressed the influence of scan type, length, frequency, scheduling, invasiveness and staff support on acceptability of imaging. It was applied to three patient groups. Group 1 consisted of patients newly recruited to studies with imaging, Group 2 consisted of previous participants in studies with imaging and Group 3 consisted of patients having imaging for clinical care. RESULTS: One hundred ninety six patients completed the questionnaires (Group 1:47; Group 2: 50 and Group 3: 99). The use of ionising radiation and number of scans required were identified as negative influences on decision to participate by 25% of Group 3 but only by 6% of Groups 1 and 2. Scan duration >30mins was perceived as a negative factor for decision to participate by all Groups (12–22%). Good communication provided by researchers in terms of discussing the study before and after reading study materials was a key factor in influencing decision to participate (> 50% in Groups 1 and 2 and > 20% in Group 3). CONCLUSION: Factors relating to imaging procedures within clinical trials that affect participation have been identified with communication around study materials as the key determinant. These data will be used to influence the development of future research protocols. Modification of imaging requirements within clinical trials will improve patient tolerance and acceptability and is likely to raise recruitment. BioMed Central 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7189543/ /pubmed/32368349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00195-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article May, Katherine Lee, Martin Jefford, Monica Ribeiro, Ana Macdonald, Alison Morgan, Veronica Usher, Marianne de Souza, Nandita M. Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation |
title | Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation |
title_full | Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation |
title_fullStr | Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation |
title_full_unstemmed | Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation |
title_short | Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation |
title_sort | imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7189543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32368349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00195-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maykatherine imaginginclinicaltrialsapatientledquestionnairestudytoassessimpactofimagingregimesonpatientparticipation AT leemartin imaginginclinicaltrialsapatientledquestionnairestudytoassessimpactofimagingregimesonpatientparticipation AT jeffordmonica imaginginclinicaltrialsapatientledquestionnairestudytoassessimpactofimagingregimesonpatientparticipation AT ribeiroana imaginginclinicaltrialsapatientledquestionnairestudytoassessimpactofimagingregimesonpatientparticipation AT macdonaldalison imaginginclinicaltrialsapatientledquestionnairestudytoassessimpactofimagingregimesonpatientparticipation AT morganveronica imaginginclinicaltrialsapatientledquestionnairestudytoassessimpactofimagingregimesonpatientparticipation AT ushermarianne imaginginclinicaltrialsapatientledquestionnairestudytoassessimpactofimagingregimesonpatientparticipation AT desouzananditam imaginginclinicaltrialsapatientledquestionnairestudytoassessimpactofimagingregimesonpatientparticipation |